Disclosing and concealing: internet governance, information control and the management of visibility

The ubiquity of digital technologies and the datafication of many domains of social life raise important questions about governance. In the emergent field of internet governance studies, most work has explored novel governance arrangements, institutional developments and the effects of interactions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mikkel Flyverbom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society 2016-09-01
Series:Internet Policy Review
Online Access:https://policyreview.info/node/428
id doaj-ba0af1028db0424683954e5acf3942b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ba0af1028db0424683954e5acf3942b22020-11-25T01:29:30ZengAlexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and SocietyInternet Policy Review2197-67752016-09-01Volume 5Issue 310.14763/2016.3.428Disclosing and concealing: internet governance, information control and the management of visibilityMikkel Flyverbom0Copenhagen Business SchoolThe ubiquity of digital technologies and the datafication of many domains of social life raise important questions about governance. In the emergent field of internet governance studies, most work has explored novel governance arrangements, institutional developments and the effects of interactions among public and private actors in the emergence of the internet as a matter of concern in global politics. But the digital realm involves more subtle forms of governance and politics that also deserve attention. In this paper, I suggest that the 'ordering' effects of digital infrastructures also revolve around what I term the ‘management of visibilities’. Drawing on insights from science and technology studies and sociologies of visibility, the paper articulates how digital technologies afford and condition ordering through the production of visibilities and the guidance of attention. The basic tenet of the argument is that there is an intimate relationship between seeing, knowing and governing, and that digitalisation and datafication processes fundamentally shape how we make things visible or invisible, knowable or unknowable and governable or ungovernable. Having articulated this conceptual argument, the article offers a number of illustrations of such forms of ordering.https://policyreview.info/node/428
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mikkel Flyverbom
spellingShingle Mikkel Flyverbom
Disclosing and concealing: internet governance, information control and the management of visibility
Internet Policy Review
author_facet Mikkel Flyverbom
author_sort Mikkel Flyverbom
title Disclosing and concealing: internet governance, information control and the management of visibility
title_short Disclosing and concealing: internet governance, information control and the management of visibility
title_full Disclosing and concealing: internet governance, information control and the management of visibility
title_fullStr Disclosing and concealing: internet governance, information control and the management of visibility
title_full_unstemmed Disclosing and concealing: internet governance, information control and the management of visibility
title_sort disclosing and concealing: internet governance, information control and the management of visibility
publisher Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
series Internet Policy Review
issn 2197-6775
publishDate 2016-09-01
description The ubiquity of digital technologies and the datafication of many domains of social life raise important questions about governance. In the emergent field of internet governance studies, most work has explored novel governance arrangements, institutional developments and the effects of interactions among public and private actors in the emergence of the internet as a matter of concern in global politics. But the digital realm involves more subtle forms of governance and politics that also deserve attention. In this paper, I suggest that the 'ordering' effects of digital infrastructures also revolve around what I term the ‘management of visibilities’. Drawing on insights from science and technology studies and sociologies of visibility, the paper articulates how digital technologies afford and condition ordering through the production of visibilities and the guidance of attention. The basic tenet of the argument is that there is an intimate relationship between seeing, knowing and governing, and that digitalisation and datafication processes fundamentally shape how we make things visible or invisible, knowable or unknowable and governable or ungovernable. Having articulated this conceptual argument, the article offers a number of illustrations of such forms of ordering.
url https://policyreview.info/node/428
work_keys_str_mv AT mikkelflyverbom disclosingandconcealinginternetgovernanceinformationcontrolandthemanagementofvisibility
_version_ 1725096666438041600