The Dispossessed: an Ideological Distopia

Ursula K. Le Guin, in her dystopian novel The Dispossessed creates two opposite worlds. Both worlds have contrasting ideologies: a non-authoritarian planet called Anarres, in which individuals experience freedom consciously and deliberately in their own terms (by the equal distribution of the power...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ela İpek Gündüz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Gaziantep University 2013-06-01
Series:Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dergipark.gov.tr/jss/issue/24236/256926?publisher=gantep
id doaj-ba07186091c84ff6917006d7bd36afc8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ba07186091c84ff6917006d7bd36afc82020-11-24T22:23:07ZengGaziantep UniversityGaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences2149-54592013-06-01121123133136The Dispossessed: an Ideological DistopiaEla İpek Gündüz0?Ursula K. Le Guin, in her dystopian novel The Dispossessed creates two opposite worlds. Both worlds have contrasting ideologies: a non-authoritarian planet called Anarres, in which individuals experience freedom consciously and deliberately in their own terms (by the equal distribution of the power dynamics in an anarchic society), and its moon Urras with its authoritarian governmental system (both by a capitalist country called A-İo, and by a communist country Thu). Through her depiction of these reverse poles Le Guin achieves to mirror the failure of different kinds of governmental systems which are the practices of the ideologies. These administrative systems fail because they cannot obtain pursuit of human freedom and happiness. According to Le Guin, the ideological representations of the governments are doomed to failure because in spite of their being imaginary systems to create a sphere of happiness for human beings, they are apart from being ideal and they have misapplications. In this article, the systematic unconscious effects of ideology (in an Alhusserian sense) on social, economic and political issues and the influences of the governmental organization on alienating the individuals to themselves by restricting their creativity and trust for themselves will be highlighted with the help of Le Guin’s two opposite dystopian worlds. Therefore, although these two opposite worlds have different ideologies, in the end they both turn out to be distopias. Le Guin proposes a solution to the problem of searching human happiness within the ideologies (represented in the administrative systems) by replacing it with the individual (who could change himself, get rid of all the prejudices, transgress all the boundaries)http://dergipark.gov.tr/jss/issue/24236/256926?publisher=gantepideoloji distopya egemenlik ideolojik devlet aygıtları Ursula K. Le Guinideology dystopia hegemony ideological state apparatuses Ursula K. Le Guin
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ela İpek Gündüz
spellingShingle Ela İpek Gündüz
The Dispossessed: an Ideological Distopia
Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences
ideoloji
distopya
egemenlik
ideolojik devlet aygıtları
Ursula K. Le Guin
ideology
dystopia
hegemony
ideological state apparatuses
Ursula K. Le Guin
author_facet Ela İpek Gündüz
author_sort Ela İpek Gündüz
title The Dispossessed: an Ideological Distopia
title_short The Dispossessed: an Ideological Distopia
title_full The Dispossessed: an Ideological Distopia
title_fullStr The Dispossessed: an Ideological Distopia
title_full_unstemmed The Dispossessed: an Ideological Distopia
title_sort dispossessed: an ideological distopia
publisher Gaziantep University
series Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences
issn 2149-5459
publishDate 2013-06-01
description Ursula K. Le Guin, in her dystopian novel The Dispossessed creates two opposite worlds. Both worlds have contrasting ideologies: a non-authoritarian planet called Anarres, in which individuals experience freedom consciously and deliberately in their own terms (by the equal distribution of the power dynamics in an anarchic society), and its moon Urras with its authoritarian governmental system (both by a capitalist country called A-İo, and by a communist country Thu). Through her depiction of these reverse poles Le Guin achieves to mirror the failure of different kinds of governmental systems which are the practices of the ideologies. These administrative systems fail because they cannot obtain pursuit of human freedom and happiness. According to Le Guin, the ideological representations of the governments are doomed to failure because in spite of their being imaginary systems to create a sphere of happiness for human beings, they are apart from being ideal and they have misapplications. In this article, the systematic unconscious effects of ideology (in an Alhusserian sense) on social, economic and political issues and the influences of the governmental organization on alienating the individuals to themselves by restricting their creativity and trust for themselves will be highlighted with the help of Le Guin’s two opposite dystopian worlds. Therefore, although these two opposite worlds have different ideologies, in the end they both turn out to be distopias. Le Guin proposes a solution to the problem of searching human happiness within the ideologies (represented in the administrative systems) by replacing it with the individual (who could change himself, get rid of all the prejudices, transgress all the boundaries)
topic ideoloji
distopya
egemenlik
ideolojik devlet aygıtları
Ursula K. Le Guin
ideology
dystopia
hegemony
ideological state apparatuses
Ursula K. Le Guin
url http://dergipark.gov.tr/jss/issue/24236/256926?publisher=gantep
work_keys_str_mv AT elaipekgunduz thedispossessedanideologicaldistopia
AT elaipekgunduz dispossessedanideologicaldistopia
_version_ 1725765789001187328