Places Change Minds: Exploring the Psychology of Urbanicity Using a Brief Contemplation Method

An accruing body of research suggests that urban environments negatively affect mental health and well-being. It is thought that some of this so-called “urbanicity effect” can be explained by the perceived quality of the living environment. The two studies reported here used online survey methods to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rhiannon Corcoran, Rosie Mansfield, Trina Giokas, Amy Hawkins, Lauren Bamford, Graham Marshall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-05-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017707004
id doaj-ba067cf18f5c427a81df3c1344f3fb6f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ba067cf18f5c427a81df3c1344f3fb6f2020-11-25T02:53:51ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402017-05-01710.1177/2158244017707004Places Change Minds: Exploring the Psychology of Urbanicity Using a Brief Contemplation MethodRhiannon Corcoran0Rosie Mansfield1Trina Giokas2Amy Hawkins3Lauren Bamford4Graham Marshall5University of Liverpool, UKUniversity of Liverpool, UKUniversity of Liverpool, UKUniversity of Liverpool, UKUniversity of Liverpool, UKProsocial Place, Liverpool, UKAn accruing body of research suggests that urban environments negatively affect mental health and well-being. It is thought that some of this so-called “urbanicity effect” can be explained by the perceived quality of the living environment. The two studies reported here used online survey methods to explore changes to self-reported psychological mechanisms thought to underpin mental health and well-being before and after participants briefly contemplated urban/rural or desirable/undesirable residential images. Our findings demonstrate that even brief contemplation of places change how we consider our futures and that places deemed relatively undesirable appear to promote a threat-focused anticipatory set. Importantly, these changes were not found to be associated with perceived urbanity but rather with perceived desirability of place. These findings should be considered alongside increasing evidence that urban regeneration and place-making are matters of public health concern.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017707004
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rhiannon Corcoran
Rosie Mansfield
Trina Giokas
Amy Hawkins
Lauren Bamford
Graham Marshall
spellingShingle Rhiannon Corcoran
Rosie Mansfield
Trina Giokas
Amy Hawkins
Lauren Bamford
Graham Marshall
Places Change Minds: Exploring the Psychology of Urbanicity Using a Brief Contemplation Method
SAGE Open
author_facet Rhiannon Corcoran
Rosie Mansfield
Trina Giokas
Amy Hawkins
Lauren Bamford
Graham Marshall
author_sort Rhiannon Corcoran
title Places Change Minds: Exploring the Psychology of Urbanicity Using a Brief Contemplation Method
title_short Places Change Minds: Exploring the Psychology of Urbanicity Using a Brief Contemplation Method
title_full Places Change Minds: Exploring the Psychology of Urbanicity Using a Brief Contemplation Method
title_fullStr Places Change Minds: Exploring the Psychology of Urbanicity Using a Brief Contemplation Method
title_full_unstemmed Places Change Minds: Exploring the Psychology of Urbanicity Using a Brief Contemplation Method
title_sort places change minds: exploring the psychology of urbanicity using a brief contemplation method
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2017-05-01
description An accruing body of research suggests that urban environments negatively affect mental health and well-being. It is thought that some of this so-called “urbanicity effect” can be explained by the perceived quality of the living environment. The two studies reported here used online survey methods to explore changes to self-reported psychological mechanisms thought to underpin mental health and well-being before and after participants briefly contemplated urban/rural or desirable/undesirable residential images. Our findings demonstrate that even brief contemplation of places change how we consider our futures and that places deemed relatively undesirable appear to promote a threat-focused anticipatory set. Importantly, these changes were not found to be associated with perceived urbanity but rather with perceived desirability of place. These findings should be considered alongside increasing evidence that urban regeneration and place-making are matters of public health concern.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017707004
work_keys_str_mv AT rhiannoncorcoran placeschangemindsexploringthepsychologyofurbanicityusingabriefcontemplationmethod
AT rosiemansfield placeschangemindsexploringthepsychologyofurbanicityusingabriefcontemplationmethod
AT trinagiokas placeschangemindsexploringthepsychologyofurbanicityusingabriefcontemplationmethod
AT amyhawkins placeschangemindsexploringthepsychologyofurbanicityusingabriefcontemplationmethod
AT laurenbamford placeschangemindsexploringthepsychologyofurbanicityusingabriefcontemplationmethod
AT grahammarshall placeschangemindsexploringthepsychologyofurbanicityusingabriefcontemplationmethod
_version_ 1724724011649204224