Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in Japanese administrative data

Background: Validation of recorded data is a prerequisite for studies that utilize administrative databases. The present study evaluated the validity of diagnoses and procedure records in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) data, along with laboratory test results in the newly-introdu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hayato Yamana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Japan Epidemiological Association 2017-09-01
Series:Journal of Epidemiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jea/27/10/27_JE56/_pdf
id doaj-ba0521e0496442cd9483d83b265ede6e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ba0521e0496442cd9483d83b265ede6e2020-11-24T22:30:32ZengJapan Epidemiological AssociationJournal of Epidemiology0917-50401349-90922017-09-01271047648210.1016/j.je.2016.09.009Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in Japanese administrative dataHayato YamanaBackground: Validation of recorded data is a prerequisite for studies that utilize administrative databases. The present study evaluated the validity of diagnoses and procedure records in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) data, along with laboratory test results in the newly-introduced Standardized Structured Medical Record Information Exchange (SS-MIX) data. Methods: Between November 2015 and February 2016, we conducted chart reviews of 315 patients hospitalized between April 2014 and March 2015 in four middle-sized acute-care hospitals in Shizuoka, Kochi, Fukuoka, and Saga Prefectures and used them as reference standards. The sensitivity and specificity of DPC data in identifying 16 diseases and 10 common procedures were identified. The accuracy of SS-MIX data for 13 laboratory test results was also examined. Results: The specificity of diagnoses in the DPC data exceeded 96%, while the sensitivity was below 50% for seven diseases and variable across diseases. When limited to primary diagnoses, the sensitivity and specificity were 78.9% and 93.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of procedure records exceeded 90% for six procedures, and the specificity exceeded 90% for nine procedures. Agreement between the SS-MIX data and the chart reviews was above 95% for all 13 items. Conclusion: The validity of diagnoses and procedure records in the DPC data and laboratory results in the SS-MIX data was high in general, supporting their use in future studies. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jea/27/10/27_JE56/_pdfAdministrative dataValidationDiagnosisProcedureLaboratory data
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hayato Yamana
spellingShingle Hayato Yamana
Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in Japanese administrative data
Journal of Epidemiology
Administrative data
Validation
Diagnosis
Procedure
Laboratory data
author_facet Hayato Yamana
author_sort Hayato Yamana
title Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in Japanese administrative data
title_short Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in Japanese administrative data
title_full Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in Japanese administrative data
title_fullStr Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in Japanese administrative data
title_full_unstemmed Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in Japanese administrative data
title_sort validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in japanese administrative data
publisher Japan Epidemiological Association
series Journal of Epidemiology
issn 0917-5040
1349-9092
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Background: Validation of recorded data is a prerequisite for studies that utilize administrative databases. The present study evaluated the validity of diagnoses and procedure records in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) data, along with laboratory test results in the newly-introduced Standardized Structured Medical Record Information Exchange (SS-MIX) data. Methods: Between November 2015 and February 2016, we conducted chart reviews of 315 patients hospitalized between April 2014 and March 2015 in four middle-sized acute-care hospitals in Shizuoka, Kochi, Fukuoka, and Saga Prefectures and used them as reference standards. The sensitivity and specificity of DPC data in identifying 16 diseases and 10 common procedures were identified. The accuracy of SS-MIX data for 13 laboratory test results was also examined. Results: The specificity of diagnoses in the DPC data exceeded 96%, while the sensitivity was below 50% for seven diseases and variable across diseases. When limited to primary diagnoses, the sensitivity and specificity were 78.9% and 93.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of procedure records exceeded 90% for six procedures, and the specificity exceeded 90% for nine procedures. Agreement between the SS-MIX data and the chart reviews was above 95% for all 13 items. Conclusion: The validity of diagnoses and procedure records in the DPC data and laboratory results in the SS-MIX data was high in general, supporting their use in future studies.
topic Administrative data
Validation
Diagnosis
Procedure
Laboratory data
url https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jea/27/10/27_JE56/_pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hayatoyamana validityofdiagnosesproceduresandlaboratorydatainjapaneseadministrativedata
_version_ 1725740426086842368