On the chronology of the formation of the Chabacano varieties: A reply to Parkvall & Jacobs

This paper is a reply to Parkvall & Jacobs (2018) who claim that the formation of Chabacano took place already in the late 16th century, right after the arrival of the Spanish to the Philippines, earlier than so far understood (Fernández 2015; Fernández & Sippola 2017). We argue against this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mauro Fernández, Eeva Sippola
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação de Crioulos de Base Lexical Portuguesa e Espanhola 2018-12-01
Series:Journal of Ibero-Romance Creoles
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.acblpe.com/revista/volume-8-2018/on-the-chronology-of-the-formation-of-the-chabacano-varieties-a-reply-to-parkvall-and-jacobs
id doaj-b9fa062d324443d0b95af6f004aab0fa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b9fa062d324443d0b95af6f004aab0fa2020-12-08T22:18:46ZengAssociação de Crioulos de Base Lexical Portuguesa e EspanholaJournal of Ibero-Romance Creoles2184-53602018-12-0183856On the chronology of the formation of the Chabacano varieties: A reply to Parkvall & JacobsMauro Fernández0Eeva Sippola1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6414-8723Universidade da CoruñaUniversity of HelsinkiThis paper is a reply to Parkvall & Jacobs (2018) who claim that the formation of Chabacano took place already in the late 16th century, right after the arrival of the Spanish to the Philippines, earlier than so far understood (Fernández 2015; Fernández & Sippola 2017). We argue against this view showing that the sources cited in Parkvall & Jacobs (2018) do not support their linguistic argument, that the Amerindian languages show traces of the Spanish prepalatal and thus similar layers of contact as in the Philippines, and that a significant social division between the routes over which the Spanish lexicon (and grammar) entered the Creole varieties and other Philippine languages is unlikely. An analysis of Chabacano personal pronouns and selected lexical items provides additional evidence in support of the view that the crystallization of Chabacano did not occur before the second half of the 17th century.http://www.acblpe.com/revista/volume-8-2018/on-the-chronology-of-the-formation-of-the-chabacano-varieties-a-reply-to-parkvall-and-jacobschabacanonformation periodsound change [ʃ] to [x]creole lexiconchabacano personal pronouns
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mauro Fernández
Eeva Sippola
spellingShingle Mauro Fernández
Eeva Sippola
On the chronology of the formation of the Chabacano varieties: A reply to Parkvall & Jacobs
Journal of Ibero-Romance Creoles
chabacanon
formation period
sound change [ʃ] to [x]
creole lexicon
chabacano personal pronouns
author_facet Mauro Fernández
Eeva Sippola
author_sort Mauro Fernández
title On the chronology of the formation of the Chabacano varieties: A reply to Parkvall & Jacobs
title_short On the chronology of the formation of the Chabacano varieties: A reply to Parkvall & Jacobs
title_full On the chronology of the formation of the Chabacano varieties: A reply to Parkvall & Jacobs
title_fullStr On the chronology of the formation of the Chabacano varieties: A reply to Parkvall & Jacobs
title_full_unstemmed On the chronology of the formation of the Chabacano varieties: A reply to Parkvall & Jacobs
title_sort on the chronology of the formation of the chabacano varieties: a reply to parkvall & jacobs
publisher Associação de Crioulos de Base Lexical Portuguesa e Espanhola
series Journal of Ibero-Romance Creoles
issn 2184-5360
publishDate 2018-12-01
description This paper is a reply to Parkvall & Jacobs (2018) who claim that the formation of Chabacano took place already in the late 16th century, right after the arrival of the Spanish to the Philippines, earlier than so far understood (Fernández 2015; Fernández & Sippola 2017). We argue against this view showing that the sources cited in Parkvall & Jacobs (2018) do not support their linguistic argument, that the Amerindian languages show traces of the Spanish prepalatal and thus similar layers of contact as in the Philippines, and that a significant social division between the routes over which the Spanish lexicon (and grammar) entered the Creole varieties and other Philippine languages is unlikely. An analysis of Chabacano personal pronouns and selected lexical items provides additional evidence in support of the view that the crystallization of Chabacano did not occur before the second half of the 17th century.
topic chabacanon
formation period
sound change [ʃ] to [x]
creole lexicon
chabacano personal pronouns
url http://www.acblpe.com/revista/volume-8-2018/on-the-chronology-of-the-formation-of-the-chabacano-varieties-a-reply-to-parkvall-and-jacobs
work_keys_str_mv AT maurofernandez onthechronologyoftheformationofthechabacanovarietiesareplytoparkvalljacobs
AT eevasippola onthechronologyoftheformationofthechabacanovarietiesareplytoparkvalljacobs
_version_ 1724388912684597248