Party change in anti-establishment parties in government: the case of Five Stars Movement and SYRIZA

FSM and SYRIZA are the main anti-establishment parties which seized power during the Great Recession. As in the Greek case in 2015, when SYRIZA coalesced with right-wing party ANEL, FSM coalesced with a radical-right party (The League). Regardless of their different ideological backgrounds, both SYR...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Davide Vittori
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Università degli Studi di Catania 2018-10-01
Series:Italian Political Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://italianpoliticalscience.com/index.php/ips/article/view/71
id doaj-b9f6c0ec90ff4bb9a8c9e8eb64e1347d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b9f6c0ec90ff4bb9a8c9e8eb64e1347d2021-06-29T20:41:19ZengUniversità degli Studi di CataniaItalian Political Science2420-84342018-10-01132789149Party change in anti-establishment parties in government: the case of Five Stars Movement and SYRIZADavide Vittori0LUISS Guido Carli University, RomeFSM and SYRIZA are the main anti-establishment parties which seized power during the Great Recession. As in the Greek case in 2015, when SYRIZA coalesced with right-wing party ANEL, FSM coalesced with a radical-right party (The League). Regardless of their different ideological backgrounds, both SYRIZA and FSM were relatively ‘new’ parties at the time of their first relevant electoral performance. While the literature has so far tackled the issue of the growth of these two parties in their political system, their organizations and their electorates, little has been said in comparative perspective on the internal reforms that the two parties undertook and their institutionalization process. The aim of this paper is to enquire into the nature of the party reforms within those parties, which the literature has labelled as anti-establishment or populist. To what extent do their reforms correspond to the theoretical frameworks that were designed in the past for mainstream parties? And, secondly, are these changes that the parties have undergone similar? In what ways? The findings show that, albeit following different paths, party changes in the two parties followed the same pattern as mainstream parties.http://italianpoliticalscience.com/index.php/ips/article/view/71anti-establishment partiespolitical partiesparty changeparty reformpopulist organizations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Davide Vittori
spellingShingle Davide Vittori
Party change in anti-establishment parties in government: the case of Five Stars Movement and SYRIZA
Italian Political Science
anti-establishment parties
political parties
party change
party reform
populist organizations
author_facet Davide Vittori
author_sort Davide Vittori
title Party change in anti-establishment parties in government: the case of Five Stars Movement and SYRIZA
title_short Party change in anti-establishment parties in government: the case of Five Stars Movement and SYRIZA
title_full Party change in anti-establishment parties in government: the case of Five Stars Movement and SYRIZA
title_fullStr Party change in anti-establishment parties in government: the case of Five Stars Movement and SYRIZA
title_full_unstemmed Party change in anti-establishment parties in government: the case of Five Stars Movement and SYRIZA
title_sort party change in anti-establishment parties in government: the case of five stars movement and syriza
publisher Università degli Studi di Catania
series Italian Political Science
issn 2420-8434
publishDate 2018-10-01
description FSM and SYRIZA are the main anti-establishment parties which seized power during the Great Recession. As in the Greek case in 2015, when SYRIZA coalesced with right-wing party ANEL, FSM coalesced with a radical-right party (The League). Regardless of their different ideological backgrounds, both SYRIZA and FSM were relatively ‘new’ parties at the time of their first relevant electoral performance. While the literature has so far tackled the issue of the growth of these two parties in their political system, their organizations and their electorates, little has been said in comparative perspective on the internal reforms that the two parties undertook and their institutionalization process. The aim of this paper is to enquire into the nature of the party reforms within those parties, which the literature has labelled as anti-establishment or populist. To what extent do their reforms correspond to the theoretical frameworks that were designed in the past for mainstream parties? And, secondly, are these changes that the parties have undergone similar? In what ways? The findings show that, albeit following different paths, party changes in the two parties followed the same pattern as mainstream parties.
topic anti-establishment parties
political parties
party change
party reform
populist organizations
url http://italianpoliticalscience.com/index.php/ips/article/view/71
work_keys_str_mv AT davidevittori partychangeinantiestablishmentpartiesingovernmentthecaseoffivestarsmovementandsyriza
_version_ 1721354377407496192