Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitation with Bone Regenerative Techniques after Fracture of the Upper Central Incisors

Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitation with Bone Regenerative Techniques after Fracture of the Upper Central Incisors

A case of implant-bone prosthetic rehabilitation, after the fracture of the maxillary central incisors, which had been treated with grafting of a bone substitute, is reported. This case was followed by the normal procedures of implantology within the traditional timeframe for bone regeneration. Howe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Massimo Amato, Vincenzo Bruno, Giuseppe Pantaleo, Antonio Cerutti, Gianrico Spagnuolo, Gilberto Sammartino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/387206
id doaj-b9e2191e587d49b88e30e28d25f4c894
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b9e2191e587d49b88e30e28d25f4c8942021-07-02T06:45:28ZengHindawi LimitedCase Reports in Dentistry2090-64472090-64552013-01-01201310.1155/2013/387206387206Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitation with Bone Regenerative Techniques after Fracture of the Upper Central IncisorsMassimo Amato0Vincenzo Bruno1Giuseppe Pantaleo2Antonio Cerutti3Gianrico Spagnuolo4Gilberto Sammartino5Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Fisciano, 84084 Salerno, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, ItalySchool of Dentistry, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, ItalyA case of implant-bone prosthetic rehabilitation, after the fracture of the maxillary central incisors, which had been treated with grafting of a bone substitute, is reported. This case was followed by the normal procedures of implantology within the traditional timeframe for bone regeneration. However, a barrier membrane was not used which shows that even along with the use of graft material a sufficient amount of bone could be achieved for a subsequent rehabilitation. Therefore, after a five-year follow-up period, osseointegration was maintained with no marginal bone loss.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/387206
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Massimo Amato
Vincenzo Bruno
Giuseppe Pantaleo
Antonio Cerutti
Gianrico Spagnuolo
Gilberto Sammartino
spellingShingle Massimo Amato
Vincenzo Bruno
Giuseppe Pantaleo
Antonio Cerutti
Gianrico Spagnuolo
Gilberto Sammartino
Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitation with Bone Regenerative Techniques after Fracture of the Upper Central Incisors
Case Reports in Dentistry
author_facet Massimo Amato
Vincenzo Bruno
Giuseppe Pantaleo
Antonio Cerutti
Gianrico Spagnuolo
Gilberto Sammartino
author_sort Massimo Amato
title Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitation with Bone Regenerative Techniques after Fracture of the Upper Central Incisors
title_short Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitation with Bone Regenerative Techniques after Fracture of the Upper Central Incisors
title_full Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitation with Bone Regenerative Techniques after Fracture of the Upper Central Incisors
title_fullStr Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitation with Bone Regenerative Techniques after Fracture of the Upper Central Incisors
title_full_unstemmed Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitation with Bone Regenerative Techniques after Fracture of the Upper Central Incisors
title_sort implant prosthetic rehabilitation with bone regenerative techniques after fracture of the upper central incisors
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Case Reports in Dentistry
issn 2090-6447
2090-6455
publishDate 2013-01-01
description A case of implant-bone prosthetic rehabilitation, after the fracture of the maxillary central incisors, which had been treated with grafting of a bone substitute, is reported. This case was followed by the normal procedures of implantology within the traditional timeframe for bone regeneration. However, a barrier membrane was not used which shows that even along with the use of graft material a sufficient amount of bone could be achieved for a subsequent rehabilitation. Therefore, after a five-year follow-up period, osseointegration was maintained with no marginal bone loss.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/387206
work_keys_str_mv AT massimoamato implantprostheticrehabilitationwithboneregenerativetechniquesafterfractureoftheuppercentralincisors
AT vincenzobruno implantprostheticrehabilitationwithboneregenerativetechniquesafterfractureoftheuppercentralincisors
AT giuseppepantaleo implantprostheticrehabilitationwithboneregenerativetechniquesafterfractureoftheuppercentralincisors
AT antoniocerutti implantprostheticrehabilitationwithboneregenerativetechniquesafterfractureoftheuppercentralincisors
AT gianricospagnuolo implantprostheticrehabilitationwithboneregenerativetechniquesafterfractureoftheuppercentralincisors
AT gilbertosammartino implantprostheticrehabilitationwithboneregenerativetechniquesafterfractureoftheuppercentralincisors
_version_ 1721336840584167424

Similar Items