Case-Mix Classification for Mental Health Care in Community Settings: A Scoping Review
As mental health care transitions from facility-based care to community-based services, methods to classify patients in terms of their expected health care resource use are an essential tool to balance the health care needs and equitable allocation of health care resources. This study performed a sc...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Health Services Insights |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1178632919862248 |
id |
doaj-b9b2f5cc15a14228bb3b59442a2f16b3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b9b2f5cc15a14228bb3b59442a2f16b32020-11-25T03:52:33ZengSAGE PublishingHealth Services Insights1178-63292019-07-011210.1177/1178632919862248Case-Mix Classification for Mental Health Care in Community Settings: A Scoping ReviewNam TranJeffrey W PossChristopher PerlmanJohn P HirdesAs mental health care transitions from facility-based care to community-based services, methods to classify patients in terms of their expected health care resource use are an essential tool to balance the health care needs and equitable allocation of health care resources. This study performed a scoping review to summarize the nature, extent, and range of research on case-mix classifications used to predict mental health care resource use in community settings. This study identified 17 eligible studies with 32 case-mix classification systems published since the 1980s. Most of these studies came from the USA Veterans Affairs and Medicare systems, and the most recent studies came from Australia. There were a wide variety of choices of input variables and measures of resource use. However, much of the variance in observed resource use was not accounted for by these case-mix systems. The research activity specific to case-mix classification for community mental health care was modest. More consideration should be given to the appropriateness of the input variables, resource use measure, and evaluation of predictive performance. Future research should take advantage of testing case-mix systems developed in other settings for community mental health care settings, if possible.https://doi.org/10.1177/1178632919862248 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nam Tran Jeffrey W Poss Christopher Perlman John P Hirdes |
spellingShingle |
Nam Tran Jeffrey W Poss Christopher Perlman John P Hirdes Case-Mix Classification for Mental Health Care in Community Settings: A Scoping Review Health Services Insights |
author_facet |
Nam Tran Jeffrey W Poss Christopher Perlman John P Hirdes |
author_sort |
Nam Tran |
title |
Case-Mix Classification for Mental Health Care in Community Settings: A Scoping Review |
title_short |
Case-Mix Classification for Mental Health Care in Community Settings: A Scoping Review |
title_full |
Case-Mix Classification for Mental Health Care in Community Settings: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr |
Case-Mix Classification for Mental Health Care in Community Settings: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Case-Mix Classification for Mental Health Care in Community Settings: A Scoping Review |
title_sort |
case-mix classification for mental health care in community settings: a scoping review |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Health Services Insights |
issn |
1178-6329 |
publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
description |
As mental health care transitions from facility-based care to community-based services, methods to classify patients in terms of their expected health care resource use are an essential tool to balance the health care needs and equitable allocation of health care resources. This study performed a scoping review to summarize the nature, extent, and range of research on case-mix classifications used to predict mental health care resource use in community settings. This study identified 17 eligible studies with 32 case-mix classification systems published since the 1980s. Most of these studies came from the USA Veterans Affairs and Medicare systems, and the most recent studies came from Australia. There were a wide variety of choices of input variables and measures of resource use. However, much of the variance in observed resource use was not accounted for by these case-mix systems. The research activity specific to case-mix classification for community mental health care was modest. More consideration should be given to the appropriateness of the input variables, resource use measure, and evaluation of predictive performance. Future research should take advantage of testing case-mix systems developed in other settings for community mental health care settings, if possible. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1178632919862248 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT namtran casemixclassificationformentalhealthcareincommunitysettingsascopingreview AT jeffreywposs casemixclassificationformentalhealthcareincommunitysettingsascopingreview AT christopherperlman casemixclassificationformentalhealthcareincommunitysettingsascopingreview AT johnphirdes casemixclassificationformentalhealthcareincommunitysettingsascopingreview |
_version_ |
1724482189480951808 |