Putting the Bite Back into "Two Dogmas"
Recent Carnap scholarship suggests that the received view of the Carnap-Quine analyticity debate is importantly mistaken. It has been suggested that Carnap’s analyticity distinction is immune from Quine’s criticisms. This is either because Quine did not understand Carnap’s use of analytic-ity, or be...
Main Author: | Paul A. Gregory |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
2003-12-01
|
Series: | Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/14794/13506 |
Similar Items
-
Carnap and Quine on Analyticity
by: Moosavi Karimi, Seyed Masoud
Published: (2012) -
Carnap and Quine on Analyticity
by: Moosavi Karimi, Seyed Masoud
Published: (2012) -
Carnap and Quine on Analyticity
by: Moosavi Karimi, Seyed Masoud
Published: (2012) -
Explicating logicality
by: Daniel Arvage Nagase
Published: (2017) -
Explicating logicality
by: Nagase, Daniel Arvage
Published: (2017)