A pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>The recognition of neonatal intestinal perforation relies on identification of free gas in the peritoneum on plain abdominal radiographs and the associated clinical signs. The neonatal bowel takes several hours to fill with gas, po...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gillies Martin J, Chowdhury Moti M, Lakhoo Kokila
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-10-01
Series:Journal of Medical Case Reports
Online Access:http://www.jmedicalcasereports.com/content/2/1/335
id doaj-b99f8d334b6246b3bf0973b5acd16f56
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b99f8d334b6246b3bf0973b5acd16f562020-11-24T22:11:27ZengBMCJournal of Medical Case Reports1752-19472008-10-012133510.1186/1752-1947-2-335A pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case reportGillies Martin JChowdhury Moti MLakhoo Kokila<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>The recognition of neonatal intestinal perforation relies on identification of free gas in the peritoneum on plain abdominal radiographs and the associated clinical signs. The neonatal bowel takes several hours to fill with gas, potentially obscuring one of the radiological signs of bowel perforation in the neonate.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>We describe the case of a male, Caucasian neonate, born prematurely at 35<sup>+2 </sup>weeks of gestation, who was suspected before birth to be at risk of intestinal perforation, based on antenatal ultrasound signs of bowel obstruction. However, the diagnosis of intestinal perforation after birth was initially delayed because the first abdominal radiograph, requested by the neonatal team, was taken too early in the clinical progression of the neonate's condition. As a consequence, this delayed referral to the paediatric surgical team and definitive management.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This case illustrates how consideration of the timing of abdominal radiographs in suspected intestinal perforation in the neonate may avoid misinterpretation of radiographic signs, thereby avoiding delays in referral and treatment in the crucial first few hours of life.</p> http://www.jmedicalcasereports.com/content/2/1/335
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gillies Martin J
Chowdhury Moti M
Lakhoo Kokila
spellingShingle Gillies Martin J
Chowdhury Moti M
Lakhoo Kokila
A pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report
Journal of Medical Case Reports
author_facet Gillies Martin J
Chowdhury Moti M
Lakhoo Kokila
author_sort Gillies Martin J
title A pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report
title_short A pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report
title_full A pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report
title_fullStr A pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report
title_full_unstemmed A pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report
title_sort pitfall in the interpretation of plain abdnominal radiographs in neonatal intestinal perforation: a case report
publisher BMC
series Journal of Medical Case Reports
issn 1752-1947
publishDate 2008-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>The recognition of neonatal intestinal perforation relies on identification of free gas in the peritoneum on plain abdominal radiographs and the associated clinical signs. The neonatal bowel takes several hours to fill with gas, potentially obscuring one of the radiological signs of bowel perforation in the neonate.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>We describe the case of a male, Caucasian neonate, born prematurely at 35<sup>+2 </sup>weeks of gestation, who was suspected before birth to be at risk of intestinal perforation, based on antenatal ultrasound signs of bowel obstruction. However, the diagnosis of intestinal perforation after birth was initially delayed because the first abdominal radiograph, requested by the neonatal team, was taken too early in the clinical progression of the neonate's condition. As a consequence, this delayed referral to the paediatric surgical team and definitive management.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This case illustrates how consideration of the timing of abdominal radiographs in suspected intestinal perforation in the neonate may avoid misinterpretation of radiographic signs, thereby avoiding delays in referral and treatment in the crucial first few hours of life.</p>
url http://www.jmedicalcasereports.com/content/2/1/335
work_keys_str_mv AT gilliesmartinj apitfallintheinterpretationofplainabdnominalradiographsinneonatalintestinalperforationacasereport
AT chowdhurymotim apitfallintheinterpretationofplainabdnominalradiographsinneonatalintestinalperforationacasereport
AT lakhookokila apitfallintheinterpretationofplainabdnominalradiographsinneonatalintestinalperforationacasereport
AT gilliesmartinj pitfallintheinterpretationofplainabdnominalradiographsinneonatalintestinalperforationacasereport
AT chowdhurymotim pitfallintheinterpretationofplainabdnominalradiographsinneonatalintestinalperforationacasereport
AT lakhookokila pitfallintheinterpretationofplainabdnominalradiographsinneonatalintestinalperforationacasereport
_version_ 1725805622000091136