What is gun culture? Cultural variations and trends across the United States

Abstract We developed empirical methods to identify variations in elements of gun culture across states. Using these methods, we then analyzed the prominence of these subcultures between states and over time from 1998 through 2016. Using state-level data, we conducted a principal component analysis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claire Boine, Michael Siegel, Craig Ross, Eric W. Fleegler, Ted Alcorn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2020-07-01
Series:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0520-6
id doaj-b99132cb7a8a4bab901d0e12976fe00c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b99132cb7a8a4bab901d0e12976fe00c2021-07-11T11:35:24ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922020-07-017111210.1057/s41599-020-0520-6What is gun culture? Cultural variations and trends across the United StatesClaire Boine0Michael Siegel1Craig Ross2Eric W. Fleegler3Ted Alcorn4Boston University School of Public HealthBoston University School of Public HealthBoston University School of Public HealthHarvard Medical SchoolColumbia University Mailman School of Public HealthAbstract We developed empirical methods to identify variations in elements of gun culture across states. Using these methods, we then analyzed the prominence of these subcultures between states and over time from 1998 through 2016. Using state-level data, we conducted a principal component analysis of 11 variables associated with gun-related behaviors and retained only the significant components. We then analyzed the presence of these components over time and across states. Based on the principal component analysis, we identified three cultural variations. Component 1 reflected recreational elements of gun culture. Component 2 represented a self-defense element of gun culture. Component 3 was indicative of a symbolic cultural element centered around the protection of the Second Amendment and insurrectionism. Over time, the recreational cultural element declined in prominence while the self-defense one rose and the Second Amendment advocacy one remained stable. This paper advances the literature on gun culture by demonstrating that: (1) gun culture is not monolithic; (2) there are multiple elements of gun culture that vary substantially between states; (3) over time, the recreational gun subculture has been falling in prominence whereas the self-defense subculture has been rising; and (4) there is another subculture, distinct from the self-defense one, which consists in mobilization around the Second Amendment and was strongest in places where state firearm laws are most extensive.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0520-6
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Claire Boine
Michael Siegel
Craig Ross
Eric W. Fleegler
Ted Alcorn
spellingShingle Claire Boine
Michael Siegel
Craig Ross
Eric W. Fleegler
Ted Alcorn
What is gun culture? Cultural variations and trends across the United States
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
author_facet Claire Boine
Michael Siegel
Craig Ross
Eric W. Fleegler
Ted Alcorn
author_sort Claire Boine
title What is gun culture? Cultural variations and trends across the United States
title_short What is gun culture? Cultural variations and trends across the United States
title_full What is gun culture? Cultural variations and trends across the United States
title_fullStr What is gun culture? Cultural variations and trends across the United States
title_full_unstemmed What is gun culture? Cultural variations and trends across the United States
title_sort what is gun culture? cultural variations and trends across the united states
publisher Springer Nature
series Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
issn 2662-9992
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Abstract We developed empirical methods to identify variations in elements of gun culture across states. Using these methods, we then analyzed the prominence of these subcultures between states and over time from 1998 through 2016. Using state-level data, we conducted a principal component analysis of 11 variables associated with gun-related behaviors and retained only the significant components. We then analyzed the presence of these components over time and across states. Based on the principal component analysis, we identified three cultural variations. Component 1 reflected recreational elements of gun culture. Component 2 represented a self-defense element of gun culture. Component 3 was indicative of a symbolic cultural element centered around the protection of the Second Amendment and insurrectionism. Over time, the recreational cultural element declined in prominence while the self-defense one rose and the Second Amendment advocacy one remained stable. This paper advances the literature on gun culture by demonstrating that: (1) gun culture is not monolithic; (2) there are multiple elements of gun culture that vary substantially between states; (3) over time, the recreational gun subculture has been falling in prominence whereas the self-defense subculture has been rising; and (4) there is another subculture, distinct from the self-defense one, which consists in mobilization around the Second Amendment and was strongest in places where state firearm laws are most extensive.
url https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0520-6
work_keys_str_mv AT claireboine whatisguncultureculturalvariationsandtrendsacrosstheunitedstates
AT michaelsiegel whatisguncultureculturalvariationsandtrendsacrosstheunitedstates
AT craigross whatisguncultureculturalvariationsandtrendsacrosstheunitedstates
AT ericwfleegler whatisguncultureculturalvariationsandtrendsacrosstheunitedstates
AT tedalcorn whatisguncultureculturalvariationsandtrendsacrosstheunitedstates
_version_ 1721308934600392704