“Charismatic Species and Beyond: How Cultural Schemas and Organisational Routines shape Conservation”

It has long been suggested that charismatic species attract a disproportionate amount of attention and resources in international conservation. This paper follows up on this observation and investigates how cultural schemas and organisational routines shape resource allocation in conservation more b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Monika Krause, Katherine Robinson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Conservation & Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2017;volume=15;issue=3;spage=313;epage=321;aulast=Krause
id doaj-b9850a299695498889638dc93040df5f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b9850a299695498889638dc93040df5f2020-11-24T23:41:02ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsConservation & Society0972-49232017-01-0115331332110.4103/cs.cs_16_63“Charismatic Species and Beyond: How Cultural Schemas and Organisational Routines shape Conservation”Monika KrauseKatherine RobinsonIt has long been suggested that charismatic species attract a disproportionate amount of attention and resources in international conservation. This paper follows up on this observation and investigates how cultural schemas and organisational routines shape resource allocation in conservation more broadly. Based on 44 in-depth interviews with programme managers in international conservation NGOs and in zoos with conservation programmes, we argue, that routines establishing units of intervention in conservation work shape the allocation of resources in ways that are not directly based on conservation science. In addition to the role of species, and charismatic species in particular, we examine the role of countries as units of interventions and of focus countries as privileged sites among them. Some countries present better opportunities than others; some are favored by institutional donors. We also discuss the role of landscapes and charismatic landscapes and of solutions and charismatic solutions.http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2017;volume=15;issue=3;spage=313;epage=321;aulast=KrauseCharismatic speciesNGOstriagepriority-settingschemasorganisational routinesconservation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Monika Krause
Katherine Robinson
spellingShingle Monika Krause
Katherine Robinson
“Charismatic Species and Beyond: How Cultural Schemas and Organisational Routines shape Conservation”
Conservation & Society
Charismatic species
NGOs
triage
priority-setting
schemas
organisational routines
conservation
author_facet Monika Krause
Katherine Robinson
author_sort Monika Krause
title “Charismatic Species and Beyond: How Cultural Schemas and Organisational Routines shape Conservation”
title_short “Charismatic Species and Beyond: How Cultural Schemas and Organisational Routines shape Conservation”
title_full “Charismatic Species and Beyond: How Cultural Schemas and Organisational Routines shape Conservation”
title_fullStr “Charismatic Species and Beyond: How Cultural Schemas and Organisational Routines shape Conservation”
title_full_unstemmed “Charismatic Species and Beyond: How Cultural Schemas and Organisational Routines shape Conservation”
title_sort “charismatic species and beyond: how cultural schemas and organisational routines shape conservation”
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Conservation & Society
issn 0972-4923
publishDate 2017-01-01
description It has long been suggested that charismatic species attract a disproportionate amount of attention and resources in international conservation. This paper follows up on this observation and investigates how cultural schemas and organisational routines shape resource allocation in conservation more broadly. Based on 44 in-depth interviews with programme managers in international conservation NGOs and in zoos with conservation programmes, we argue, that routines establishing units of intervention in conservation work shape the allocation of resources in ways that are not directly based on conservation science. In addition to the role of species, and charismatic species in particular, we examine the role of countries as units of interventions and of focus countries as privileged sites among them. Some countries present better opportunities than others; some are favored by institutional donors. We also discuss the role of landscapes and charismatic landscapes and of solutions and charismatic solutions.
topic Charismatic species
NGOs
triage
priority-setting
schemas
organisational routines
conservation
url http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2017;volume=15;issue=3;spage=313;epage=321;aulast=Krause
work_keys_str_mv AT monikakrause charismaticspeciesandbeyondhowculturalschemasandorganisationalroutinesshapeconservation
AT katherinerobinson charismaticspeciesandbeyondhowculturalschemasandorganisationalroutinesshapeconservation
_version_ 1725508197243944960