Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background The present study aims to assess the influence of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on stability in implants placed in healed sites. Material and methods The present study followed the SPIRIT statement and is reported according to CONSORT. Patients were randomly allocated to LLLT or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mateus de Azevedo Kinalski, Bernardo Antonio Agostini, Cesar Dalmolin Bergoli, Mateus Bertolini Fernandes dos Santos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-06-01
Series:International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00331-0
Description
Summary:Abstract Background The present study aims to assess the influence of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on stability in implants placed in healed sites. Material and methods The present study followed the SPIRIT statement and is reported according to CONSORT. Patients were randomly allocated to LLLT or control groups. LLLT consisted in the application of 808-nm GaAlA laser applied before the preparation of the implant bed and after suturing (80 seconds; 11J/cm2). Implant stability quotient (ISQ) and the distance between the implant platform to the alveolar bone crest (millimeters) were assessed at implant placement (T0) and the abutment selection phase (4–6 months, Ta). Results A total of 64 implants were placed in 33 patients. The insertion torque ranged from 10 to 70 N.cm (mean 43.23; SD ±16.82). The T0 ISQ ranged from 18 to 95.5 (mean 61.7; SD ±18.23) and the crestal bone radiographic distance was 2.03 mm (SD±1.27). At Ta, the ISQ ranged from 39 to 90 (mean 64.2; SD±9.84), and the mean crestal bone radiographic loss was 1.70mm (SD±1.65). However, no differences were observed when LLLT and control groups were compared with ISQ difference (Ta–T0; p=0.598) or radiographical peri-implant alterations (p=0.531). Conclusion LLLT did not influence the implant stability in implants placed in healed sites compared to a control group. Trial registration ReBEC, RBR-35TNJ7 . Registered May 23, 2018
ISSN:2198-4034