Wildfire exposure during pregnancy and the risk of adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review

Background: Maternal wildfire exposure (e.g., smoke, stress) has been associated with poor birth outcomes with effects potentially mediated through air pollution and psychosocial stress. Despite the recent hike in the intensity and frequency of wildfires in some regions of the world, a critical appr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sana Amjad, Dagmara Chojecki, Alvaro Osornio-Vargas, Maria B. Ospina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-11-01
Series:Environment International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412021002695
id doaj-b97be8f83213480083ba359d18d85af7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b97be8f83213480083ba359d18d85af72021-08-18T04:20:54ZengElsevierEnvironment International0160-41202021-11-01156106644Wildfire exposure during pregnancy and the risk of adverse birth outcomes: A systematic reviewSana Amjad0Dagmara Chojecki1Alvaro Osornio-Vargas2Maria B. Ospina3Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alberta, all in Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaJohn W. Scott Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, all in Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, all in Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alberta, all in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Corresponding author at: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, 220B Heritage Medical Research Centre, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada.Background: Maternal wildfire exposure (e.g., smoke, stress) has been associated with poor birth outcomes with effects potentially mediated through air pollution and psychosocial stress. Despite the recent hike in the intensity and frequency of wildfires in some regions of the world, a critical appraisal of the evidence on the association between maternal wildfire exposure and adverse birth outcomes has not yet been undertaken. We conducted a systematic review that evaluated the scientific evidence on the association between wildfire exposure during pregnancy and the risk of adverse birth outcomes. Methods: Comprehensive searches in nine bibliographic databases were conducted from database inception up to June 2020. Observational epidemiological studies that evaluated associations between exposure to wildfire during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes were eligible for inclusion. Studies were assessed using the National Toxicology Program’s Office of Health Assessment and Translation (NTP OHAT) risk of bias tool and certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Screening of retrieved articles, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Study results were synthesized descriptively. Results: Eight epidemiological studies conducted in four countries and involving 1,702,252 births were included in the review. The exposure to wildfire during pregnancy was assessed in individual studies by measurement of PM2.5 (n = 2), PM10 (n = 1), Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) aerosol index (n = 1), heat spots (n = 1), and by proximity of maternal residence to wildfire-affected areas (n = 3). There is some evidence indicating that maternal wildfire exposure associates with birth weight reduction (n = 7) and preterm birth (n = 4), particularly when exposure to wildfire smoke occurred in late pregnancy. The association between wildfire exposure and small for gestational age (n = 2) and infant mortality (n = 1) was inconclusive. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that maternal exposure to wildfire during late pregnancy is linked to reduced birth weight and preterm birth. Well-designed comprehensive studies are needed to better understand the perinatal effects of wildfires.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412021002695WildfirePregnancyAdverse birth outcomes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sana Amjad
Dagmara Chojecki
Alvaro Osornio-Vargas
Maria B. Ospina
spellingShingle Sana Amjad
Dagmara Chojecki
Alvaro Osornio-Vargas
Maria B. Ospina
Wildfire exposure during pregnancy and the risk of adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review
Environment International
Wildfire
Pregnancy
Adverse birth outcomes
author_facet Sana Amjad
Dagmara Chojecki
Alvaro Osornio-Vargas
Maria B. Ospina
author_sort Sana Amjad
title Wildfire exposure during pregnancy and the risk of adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review
title_short Wildfire exposure during pregnancy and the risk of adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review
title_full Wildfire exposure during pregnancy and the risk of adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review
title_fullStr Wildfire exposure during pregnancy and the risk of adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Wildfire exposure during pregnancy and the risk of adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review
title_sort wildfire exposure during pregnancy and the risk of adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review
publisher Elsevier
series Environment International
issn 0160-4120
publishDate 2021-11-01
description Background: Maternal wildfire exposure (e.g., smoke, stress) has been associated with poor birth outcomes with effects potentially mediated through air pollution and psychosocial stress. Despite the recent hike in the intensity and frequency of wildfires in some regions of the world, a critical appraisal of the evidence on the association between maternal wildfire exposure and adverse birth outcomes has not yet been undertaken. We conducted a systematic review that evaluated the scientific evidence on the association between wildfire exposure during pregnancy and the risk of adverse birth outcomes. Methods: Comprehensive searches in nine bibliographic databases were conducted from database inception up to June 2020. Observational epidemiological studies that evaluated associations between exposure to wildfire during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes were eligible for inclusion. Studies were assessed using the National Toxicology Program’s Office of Health Assessment and Translation (NTP OHAT) risk of bias tool and certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Screening of retrieved articles, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Study results were synthesized descriptively. Results: Eight epidemiological studies conducted in four countries and involving 1,702,252 births were included in the review. The exposure to wildfire during pregnancy was assessed in individual studies by measurement of PM2.5 (n = 2), PM10 (n = 1), Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) aerosol index (n = 1), heat spots (n = 1), and by proximity of maternal residence to wildfire-affected areas (n = 3). There is some evidence indicating that maternal wildfire exposure associates with birth weight reduction (n = 7) and preterm birth (n = 4), particularly when exposure to wildfire smoke occurred in late pregnancy. The association between wildfire exposure and small for gestational age (n = 2) and infant mortality (n = 1) was inconclusive. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that maternal exposure to wildfire during late pregnancy is linked to reduced birth weight and preterm birth. Well-designed comprehensive studies are needed to better understand the perinatal effects of wildfires.
topic Wildfire
Pregnancy
Adverse birth outcomes
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412021002695
work_keys_str_mv AT sanaamjad wildfireexposureduringpregnancyandtheriskofadversebirthoutcomesasystematicreview
AT dagmarachojecki wildfireexposureduringpregnancyandtheriskofadversebirthoutcomesasystematicreview
AT alvaroosorniovargas wildfireexposureduringpregnancyandtheriskofadversebirthoutcomesasystematicreview
AT mariabospina wildfireexposureduringpregnancyandtheriskofadversebirthoutcomesasystematicreview
_version_ 1721203808715931648