Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis
Forensic scientists and commentators including academics and statisticians have been embroiled in a debate over the best way to present evidence in the courtroom. Various forms of evidence presentation, both quantitative and qualitative, have been championed, yet amidst the furor over the most “corr...
Main Author: | Heidi Eldridge |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Forensic Science International: Synergy |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X19300683 |
Similar Items
-
Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors, juries, and judges
by: William Douglas Woody, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
The Interactive Effects of Race and Expert Testimony on Jurors’ Perceptions of Recanted Confessions
by: Logan Ewanation, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
The Effects of Juror Need for Cognition: Perceptions of Trustworthiness in Expert Witness Testimony
by: Armstrong, Matthew Nicholas
Published: (2012) -
Does expert psychological testimony improve juror sensitivity to lineup suggestiveness?
by: Devenport, Jennifer Leigh
Published: (1996) -
Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on mock-juror decisionmaking
by: Berman, Garrett L.
Published: (1995)