Eliciting Weights of Significance of Criteria for a Monitoring Model of Performance of SMEs for Successful Insolvency Administrator’s Intervention

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are accounted for as a major part of the economy of the EU in terms of part of the population employed, turnover, value-added, etc. Causes of insolvency of SMEs can be different; they are categorized in the paper. A considerable shift from resolving cases of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Askoldas Podviezko, Ralph Kurschus, Giedre Lapinskiene
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-10-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/20/5667
id doaj-b95b5a83cf684ed783100d1075cfd1d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b95b5a83cf684ed783100d1075cfd1d92020-11-25T02:36:22ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-10-011120566710.3390/su11205667su11205667Eliciting Weights of Significance of Criteria for a Monitoring Model of Performance of SMEs for Successful Insolvency Administrator’s InterventionAskoldas Podviezko0Ralph Kurschus1Giedre Lapinskiene2Agricultural Policy and Foreign Trade Division, Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, LT-03105 Vilnius, LithuaniaRechtsanwalte—Insolvenzverwalter, Schwedenstraße 11, DE-17033 Neubrandenburg, GermanyDepartment of Business Technologies and Entrepreneurship, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio ave, LT-10223 Vilnius, LithuaniaSmall and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are accounted for as a major part of the economy of the EU in terms of part of the population employed, turnover, value-added, etc. Causes of insolvency of SMEs can be different; they are categorized in the paper. A considerable shift from resolving cases of bankruptcy with the sole aim to satisfy creditors’ rights to augmenting and enhancing liquidation and reorganization procedures evolved interest of the authors in creating efficient bankruptcy prediction models and, in particular, methodologies for evaluation and monitoring of the performance of SMEs. In the paper, we reviewed several initiatives and instruments created by the EU for supporting SMEs. The paper laid a foundation for creating a more comprehensive methodology for evaluation of the state of a firm undergoing the process of reorganization. A hierarchy structure of criteria for the evaluation of SMEs was used in the paper; methodologies for eliciting weights of importance of criteria from experts and gauging the level of concordance of opinions of experts were applied. Resulting weights of criteria of performance of an insolvent SME were obtained; the importance of the managerial category of criteria was revealed. Prominent features of hierarchy structures and methodology of using the structure for calculating ultimate weights were described and demonstrated. Gauging concordance of opinions of experts revealed a satisfactory level of concordance of opinions of experts; this allowed to prepare the ultimate weights of criteria for multiple criteria evaluation of SMEs for further research.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/20/5667smesperformance measurementperformance managementbankruptcyreorganizationinsolvency administratordecision-makingmultiple criteria evaluationkendall’s theory of concordancehierarchy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Askoldas Podviezko
Ralph Kurschus
Giedre Lapinskiene
spellingShingle Askoldas Podviezko
Ralph Kurschus
Giedre Lapinskiene
Eliciting Weights of Significance of Criteria for a Monitoring Model of Performance of SMEs for Successful Insolvency Administrator’s Intervention
Sustainability
smes
performance measurement
performance management
bankruptcy
reorganization
insolvency administrator
decision-making
multiple criteria evaluation
kendall’s theory of concordance
hierarchy
author_facet Askoldas Podviezko
Ralph Kurschus
Giedre Lapinskiene
author_sort Askoldas Podviezko
title Eliciting Weights of Significance of Criteria for a Monitoring Model of Performance of SMEs for Successful Insolvency Administrator’s Intervention
title_short Eliciting Weights of Significance of Criteria for a Monitoring Model of Performance of SMEs for Successful Insolvency Administrator’s Intervention
title_full Eliciting Weights of Significance of Criteria for a Monitoring Model of Performance of SMEs for Successful Insolvency Administrator’s Intervention
title_fullStr Eliciting Weights of Significance of Criteria for a Monitoring Model of Performance of SMEs for Successful Insolvency Administrator’s Intervention
title_full_unstemmed Eliciting Weights of Significance of Criteria for a Monitoring Model of Performance of SMEs for Successful Insolvency Administrator’s Intervention
title_sort eliciting weights of significance of criteria for a monitoring model of performance of smes for successful insolvency administrator’s intervention
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are accounted for as a major part of the economy of the EU in terms of part of the population employed, turnover, value-added, etc. Causes of insolvency of SMEs can be different; they are categorized in the paper. A considerable shift from resolving cases of bankruptcy with the sole aim to satisfy creditors’ rights to augmenting and enhancing liquidation and reorganization procedures evolved interest of the authors in creating efficient bankruptcy prediction models and, in particular, methodologies for evaluation and monitoring of the performance of SMEs. In the paper, we reviewed several initiatives and instruments created by the EU for supporting SMEs. The paper laid a foundation for creating a more comprehensive methodology for evaluation of the state of a firm undergoing the process of reorganization. A hierarchy structure of criteria for the evaluation of SMEs was used in the paper; methodologies for eliciting weights of importance of criteria from experts and gauging the level of concordance of opinions of experts were applied. Resulting weights of criteria of performance of an insolvent SME were obtained; the importance of the managerial category of criteria was revealed. Prominent features of hierarchy structures and methodology of using the structure for calculating ultimate weights were described and demonstrated. Gauging concordance of opinions of experts revealed a satisfactory level of concordance of opinions of experts; this allowed to prepare the ultimate weights of criteria for multiple criteria evaluation of SMEs for further research.
topic smes
performance measurement
performance management
bankruptcy
reorganization
insolvency administrator
decision-making
multiple criteria evaluation
kendall’s theory of concordance
hierarchy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/20/5667
work_keys_str_mv AT askoldaspodviezko elicitingweightsofsignificanceofcriteriaforamonitoringmodelofperformanceofsmesforsuccessfulinsolvencyadministratorsintervention
AT ralphkurschus elicitingweightsofsignificanceofcriteriaforamonitoringmodelofperformanceofsmesforsuccessfulinsolvencyadministratorsintervention
AT giedrelapinskiene elicitingweightsofsignificanceofcriteriaforamonitoringmodelofperformanceofsmesforsuccessfulinsolvencyadministratorsintervention
_version_ 1724800602593034240