COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS

<p>Woods from plantation stands of parana, slash and loblolly pines, thinned at least once, were tested with the objective of comparing physical and mechanical properties. Five threes from each specie were harvested from selected stands. The stems were bucked into logs and then transported to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elio José Santini, Clóvis Roberto Haselein, Darci Alberto Gatto
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria 2009-09-01
Series:Ciência Florestal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cascavel.ufsm.br/revistas/ojs-2.2.2/index.php/cienciaflorestal/article/view/397
id doaj-b95b111b7436477b9172ef10cc2a7bbc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b95b111b7436477b9172ef10cc2a7bbc2020-11-24T23:27:20ZporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCiência Florestal0103-99541980-50982009-09-01101859310.5902/19805098397248COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODSElio José Santini0Clóvis Roberto HaseleinDarci Alberto GattoUFSM<p>Woods from plantation stands of parana, slash and loblolly pines, thinned at least once, were tested with the objective of comparing physical and mechanical properties. Five threes from each specie were harvested from selected stands. The stems were bucked into logs and then transported to the sawmill cooperating in this study. The logs were processed into planks, which were air seasoned, and then cut into pieces according to ASTM standards. Although the average strength of parana pine was slightly larger than the two other pines, significant differences were found only in the tests of static bending (modulus of elasticity and tension at the proportional limit), compression parallel to the grain (maximum crushing strength, modulus of elasticity and tension at the proportional limit) and hardness (cross-section). The  properties  were  not  different  for  slash  and loblolly pines, except in tension perpendicular to the grain, where the strength of loblolly pine was higher than the others. No differences were found for specific gravity and shrinkage among the species.</p>http://cascavel.ufsm.br/revistas/ojs-2.2.2/index.php/cienciaflorestal/article/view/397Propriedadesaraucária<i>Pinus elliottiiPinus taeda.</i>
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elio José Santini
Clóvis Roberto Haselein
Darci Alberto Gatto
spellingShingle Elio José Santini
Clóvis Roberto Haselein
Darci Alberto Gatto
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
Ciência Florestal
Propriedades
araucária
<i>Pinus elliottii
Pinus taeda.</i>
author_facet Elio José Santini
Clóvis Roberto Haselein
Darci Alberto Gatto
author_sort Elio José Santini
title COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
title_short COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
title_full COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
title_fullStr COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
title_full_unstemmed COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
title_sort comparative analysis of physical and mechanical properties of wood from three plantation softwoods
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
series Ciência Florestal
issn 0103-9954
1980-5098
publishDate 2009-09-01
description <p>Woods from plantation stands of parana, slash and loblolly pines, thinned at least once, were tested with the objective of comparing physical and mechanical properties. Five threes from each specie were harvested from selected stands. The stems were bucked into logs and then transported to the sawmill cooperating in this study. The logs were processed into planks, which were air seasoned, and then cut into pieces according to ASTM standards. Although the average strength of parana pine was slightly larger than the two other pines, significant differences were found only in the tests of static bending (modulus of elasticity and tension at the proportional limit), compression parallel to the grain (maximum crushing strength, modulus of elasticity and tension at the proportional limit) and hardness (cross-section). The  properties  were  not  different  for  slash  and loblolly pines, except in tension perpendicular to the grain, where the strength of loblolly pine was higher than the others. No differences were found for specific gravity and shrinkage among the species.</p>
topic Propriedades
araucária
<i>Pinus elliottii
Pinus taeda.</i>
url http://cascavel.ufsm.br/revistas/ojs-2.2.2/index.php/cienciaflorestal/article/view/397
work_keys_str_mv AT eliojosesantini comparativeanalysisofphysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofwoodfromthreeplantationsoftwoods
AT clovisrobertohaselein comparativeanalysisofphysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofwoodfromthreeplantationsoftwoods
AT darcialbertogatto comparativeanalysisofphysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofwoodfromthreeplantationsoftwoods
_version_ 1725552319692537856