COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS
<p>Woods from plantation stands of parana, slash and loblolly pines, thinned at least once, were tested with the objective of comparing physical and mechanical properties. Five threes from each specie were harvested from selected stands. The stems were bucked into logs and then transported to...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
2009-09-01
|
Series: | Ciência Florestal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://cascavel.ufsm.br/revistas/ojs-2.2.2/index.php/cienciaflorestal/article/view/397 |
id |
doaj-b95b111b7436477b9172ef10cc2a7bbc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b95b111b7436477b9172ef10cc2a7bbc2020-11-24T23:27:20ZporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCiência Florestal0103-99541980-50982009-09-01101859310.5902/19805098397248COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODSElio José Santini0Clóvis Roberto HaseleinDarci Alberto GattoUFSM<p>Woods from plantation stands of parana, slash and loblolly pines, thinned at least once, were tested with the objective of comparing physical and mechanical properties. Five threes from each specie were harvested from selected stands. The stems were bucked into logs and then transported to the sawmill cooperating in this study. The logs were processed into planks, which were air seasoned, and then cut into pieces according to ASTM standards. Although the average strength of parana pine was slightly larger than the two other pines, significant differences were found only in the tests of static bending (modulus of elasticity and tension at the proportional limit), compression parallel to the grain (maximum crushing strength, modulus of elasticity and tension at the proportional limit) and hardness (cross-section). The properties were not different for slash and loblolly pines, except in tension perpendicular to the grain, where the strength of loblolly pine was higher than the others. No differences were found for specific gravity and shrinkage among the species.</p>http://cascavel.ufsm.br/revistas/ojs-2.2.2/index.php/cienciaflorestal/article/view/397Propriedadesaraucária<i>Pinus elliottiiPinus taeda.</i> |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Portuguese |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Elio José Santini Clóvis Roberto Haselein Darci Alberto Gatto |
spellingShingle |
Elio José Santini Clóvis Roberto Haselein Darci Alberto Gatto COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS Ciência Florestal Propriedades araucária <i>Pinus elliottii Pinus taeda.</i> |
author_facet |
Elio José Santini Clóvis Roberto Haselein Darci Alberto Gatto |
author_sort |
Elio José Santini |
title |
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS |
title_short |
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS |
title_full |
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS |
title_fullStr |
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS |
title_full_unstemmed |
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOOD FROM THREE PLANTATION SOFTWOODS |
title_sort |
comparative analysis of physical and mechanical properties of wood from three plantation softwoods |
publisher |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
series |
Ciência Florestal |
issn |
0103-9954 1980-5098 |
publishDate |
2009-09-01 |
description |
<p>Woods from plantation stands of parana, slash and loblolly pines, thinned at least once, were tested with the objective of comparing physical and mechanical properties. Five threes from each specie were harvested from selected stands. The stems were bucked into logs and then transported to the sawmill cooperating in this study. The logs were processed into planks, which were air seasoned, and then cut into pieces according to ASTM standards. Although the average strength of parana pine was slightly larger than the two other pines, significant differences were found only in the tests of static bending (modulus of elasticity and tension at the proportional limit), compression parallel to the grain (maximum crushing strength, modulus of elasticity and tension at the proportional limit) and hardness (cross-section). The properties were not different for slash and loblolly pines, except in tension perpendicular to the grain, where the strength of loblolly pine was higher than the others. No differences were found for specific gravity and shrinkage among the species.</p> |
topic |
Propriedades araucária <i>Pinus elliottii Pinus taeda.</i> |
url |
http://cascavel.ufsm.br/revistas/ojs-2.2.2/index.php/cienciaflorestal/article/view/397 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT eliojosesantini comparativeanalysisofphysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofwoodfromthreeplantationsoftwoods AT clovisrobertohaselein comparativeanalysisofphysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofwoodfromthreeplantationsoftwoods AT darcialbertogatto comparativeanalysisofphysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofwoodfromthreeplantationsoftwoods |
_version_ |
1725552319692537856 |