Faculty Perception Towards a “Hybrid” Problem Based Learning Methodology
This sequential quantitative and qualitative study was done to assess the perception of faculties towards a hybrid Problem Based Learning (PBL) methodology. To begin with, all faculty members of the department featured in a round of PBL facilitation. Later in phase I, their perception was assessed...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2016-11-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/8872/21910_CE[Ra]_F(Sh)_%20PF1(PI_VJ)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PCP).pdf |
id |
doaj-b920c923f7234e4c83616c70e74c125e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b920c923f7234e4c83616c70e74c125e2020-11-25T03:19:29ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2016-11-011011LM01LM0310.7860/JCDR/2016/21910.8872Faculty Perception Towards a “Hybrid” Problem Based Learning MethodologyNitin Joseph0Animesh Jain1Shashidhar M Kotian2Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine and Member of Medical Education Unit, Kasturba Medical College, Light House Hill Road, Manipal University, Mangalore, India.Professor and HOD, Department of Community Medicine and Member of Medical Education Unit, Kasturba Medical College, Light House Hill Road, Manipal University, Mangalore, India.Selection Grade Lecturer in Bio-Statistics, Department of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Light House Hill Road, Manipal University, Mangalore, India. This sequential quantitative and qualitative study was done to assess the perception of faculties towards a hybrid Problem Based Learning (PBL) methodology. To begin with, all faculty members of the department featured in a round of PBL facilitation. Later in phase I, their perception was assessed using a validated self-administered questionnaire. In phase II, personalized interview was conducted with each faculty. Finally phase (III) involved a focus group discussion on issues identified in previous phases. Among the 10 faculties, 9 had good and 1 had average perception about PBL. The various issues brought out by faculty in phase (II) and (III) were; need of formalized training in PBL for facilitators, need of integrated PBL sessions, need of variety of PBL exercises and need of student’s assessment for every session.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/8872/21910_CE[Ra]_F(Sh)_%20PF1(PI_VJ)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PCP).pdffacultieshybrid modelperceptionproblem based learning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nitin Joseph Animesh Jain Shashidhar M Kotian |
spellingShingle |
Nitin Joseph Animesh Jain Shashidhar M Kotian Faculty Perception Towards a “Hybrid” Problem Based Learning Methodology Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research faculties hybrid model perception problem based learning |
author_facet |
Nitin Joseph Animesh Jain Shashidhar M Kotian |
author_sort |
Nitin Joseph |
title |
Faculty Perception Towards a “Hybrid” Problem Based Learning Methodology |
title_short |
Faculty Perception Towards a “Hybrid” Problem Based Learning Methodology |
title_full |
Faculty Perception Towards a “Hybrid” Problem Based Learning Methodology |
title_fullStr |
Faculty Perception Towards a “Hybrid” Problem Based Learning Methodology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Faculty Perception Towards a “Hybrid” Problem Based Learning Methodology |
title_sort |
faculty perception towards a “hybrid” problem based learning methodology |
publisher |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited |
series |
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
issn |
2249-782X 0973-709X |
publishDate |
2016-11-01 |
description |
This sequential quantitative and qualitative study was done to assess the perception of faculties towards a hybrid Problem Based
Learning (PBL) methodology. To begin with, all faculty members of the department featured in a round of PBL facilitation. Later in phase
I, their perception was assessed using a validated self-administered questionnaire. In phase II, personalized interview was conducted
with each faculty. Finally phase (III) involved a focus group discussion on issues identified in previous phases.
Among the 10 faculties, 9 had good and 1 had average perception about PBL. The various issues brought out by faculty in phase (II)
and (III) were; need of formalized training in PBL for facilitators, need of integrated PBL sessions, need of variety of PBL exercises and
need of student’s assessment for every session. |
topic |
faculties hybrid model perception problem based learning |
url |
https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/8872/21910_CE[Ra]_F(Sh)_%20PF1(PI_VJ)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PCP).pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nitinjoseph facultyperceptiontowardsahybridproblembasedlearningmethodology AT animeshjain facultyperceptiontowardsahybridproblembasedlearningmethodology AT shashidharmkotian facultyperceptiontowardsahybridproblembasedlearningmethodology |
_version_ |
1724622026094673920 |