Faculty Perception Towards a “Hybrid” Problem Based Learning Methodology

This sequential quantitative and qualitative study was done to assess the perception of faculties towards a hybrid Problem Based Learning (PBL) methodology. To begin with, all faculty members of the department featured in a round of PBL facilitation. Later in phase I, their perception was assessed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nitin Joseph, Animesh Jain, Shashidhar M Kotian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2016-11-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/8872/21910_CE[Ra]_F(Sh)_%20PF1(PI_VJ)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PCP).pdf
id doaj-b920c923f7234e4c83616c70e74c125e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b920c923f7234e4c83616c70e74c125e2020-11-25T03:19:29ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2016-11-011011LM01LM0310.7860/JCDR/2016/21910.8872Faculty Perception Towards a “Hybrid” Problem Based Learning MethodologyNitin Joseph0Animesh Jain1Shashidhar M Kotian2Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine and Member of Medical Education Unit, Kasturba Medical College, Light House Hill Road, Manipal University, Mangalore, India.Professor and HOD, Department of Community Medicine and Member of Medical Education Unit, Kasturba Medical College, Light House Hill Road, Manipal University, Mangalore, India.Selection Grade Lecturer in Bio-Statistics, Department of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Light House Hill Road, Manipal University, Mangalore, India. This sequential quantitative and qualitative study was done to assess the perception of faculties towards a hybrid Problem Based Learning (PBL) methodology. To begin with, all faculty members of the department featured in a round of PBL facilitation. Later in phase I, their perception was assessed using a validated self-administered questionnaire. In phase II, personalized interview was conducted with each faculty. Finally phase (III) involved a focus group discussion on issues identified in previous phases. Among the 10 faculties, 9 had good and 1 had average perception about PBL. The various issues brought out by faculty in phase (II) and (III) were; need of formalized training in PBL for facilitators, need of integrated PBL sessions, need of variety of PBL exercises and need of student’s assessment for every session.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/8872/21910_CE[Ra]_F(Sh)_%20PF1(PI_VJ)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PCP).pdffacultieshybrid modelperceptionproblem based learning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nitin Joseph
Animesh Jain
Shashidhar M Kotian
spellingShingle Nitin Joseph
Animesh Jain
Shashidhar M Kotian
Faculty Perception Towards a “Hybrid” Problem Based Learning Methodology
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
faculties
hybrid model
perception
problem based learning
author_facet Nitin Joseph
Animesh Jain
Shashidhar M Kotian
author_sort Nitin Joseph
title Faculty Perception Towards a “Hybrid” Problem Based Learning Methodology
title_short Faculty Perception Towards a “Hybrid” Problem Based Learning Methodology
title_full Faculty Perception Towards a “Hybrid” Problem Based Learning Methodology
title_fullStr Faculty Perception Towards a “Hybrid” Problem Based Learning Methodology
title_full_unstemmed Faculty Perception Towards a “Hybrid” Problem Based Learning Methodology
title_sort faculty perception towards a “hybrid” problem based learning methodology
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
publishDate 2016-11-01
description This sequential quantitative and qualitative study was done to assess the perception of faculties towards a hybrid Problem Based Learning (PBL) methodology. To begin with, all faculty members of the department featured in a round of PBL facilitation. Later in phase I, their perception was assessed using a validated self-administered questionnaire. In phase II, personalized interview was conducted with each faculty. Finally phase (III) involved a focus group discussion on issues identified in previous phases. Among the 10 faculties, 9 had good and 1 had average perception about PBL. The various issues brought out by faculty in phase (II) and (III) were; need of formalized training in PBL for facilitators, need of integrated PBL sessions, need of variety of PBL exercises and need of student’s assessment for every session.
topic faculties
hybrid model
perception
problem based learning
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/8872/21910_CE[Ra]_F(Sh)_%20PF1(PI_VJ)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PCP).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nitinjoseph facultyperceptiontowardsahybridproblembasedlearningmethodology
AT animeshjain facultyperceptiontowardsahybridproblembasedlearningmethodology
AT shashidharmkotian facultyperceptiontowardsahybridproblembasedlearningmethodology
_version_ 1724622026094673920