‘Leading by Science’ through Covid-19: the GDPR & Automated Decision-Making

The UK government announced in March 2020 that it would create an NHS Covid-19 ‘Data Store’ from information routinely collected as part of the health service. This ‘Store’ would use a number of sources of population data to provide a ‘single source of truth’ about the spread of the coronavirus in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Miranda Jane Mourby
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Swansea University 2021-04-01
Series:International Journal of Population Data Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijpds.org/article/view/1402
id doaj-b916b58156274fc18027d1964b15da5d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b916b58156274fc18027d1964b15da5d2021-04-19T17:10:27ZengSwansea UniversityInternational Journal of Population Data Science2399-49082021-04-015410.23889/ijpds.v5i4.1402‘Leading by Science’ through Covid-19: the GDPR & Automated Decision-MakingMiranda Jane Mourby0Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies, University of Oxford, Ewert House, Oxford, OX2 7DD, UK The UK government announced in March 2020 that it would create an NHS Covid-19 ‘Data Store’ from information routinely collected as part of the health service. This ‘Store’ would use a number of sources of population data to provide a ‘single source of truth’ about the spread of the coronavirus in England. The initiative illustrates the difficulty of relying on automated processing when making healthcare decisions under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The end-product of the store, a number of ‘dashboards’ for decision-makers, was intended to include models and simulations developed through artificial intelligence. Decisions made on the basis of these dashboards would be significant, even (it was suggested) to the point of diverting patients and critical resources between hospitals based on their predictions. How these models will be developed, and externally validated, remains unclear. This is an issue if they are intended to be used for decisions which will affect patients so directly and acutely. We have (by default) a right under the GDPR not to be subject to significant decisions based solely on automated decision-making. It is not obvious, at present, whether resource allocation within the NHS could take place in reliance on this automated modelling. The recent A Level debacle illustrates, in the context of education, the risks of basing life-changing decisions on the national application of a single equation. It is worth considering the potential consequences for the health service if the NHS Data Store is used for resource planning as part of the Covid-19 response. https://ijpds.org/article/view/1402Covid-19AlgorithmsAutomated Decision-MakingGeneral Data Protection Regulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Miranda Jane Mourby
spellingShingle Miranda Jane Mourby
‘Leading by Science’ through Covid-19: the GDPR & Automated Decision-Making
International Journal of Population Data Science
Covid-19
Algorithms
Automated Decision-Making
General Data Protection Regulation
author_facet Miranda Jane Mourby
author_sort Miranda Jane Mourby
title ‘Leading by Science’ through Covid-19: the GDPR & Automated Decision-Making
title_short ‘Leading by Science’ through Covid-19: the GDPR & Automated Decision-Making
title_full ‘Leading by Science’ through Covid-19: the GDPR & Automated Decision-Making
title_fullStr ‘Leading by Science’ through Covid-19: the GDPR & Automated Decision-Making
title_full_unstemmed ‘Leading by Science’ through Covid-19: the GDPR & Automated Decision-Making
title_sort ‘leading by science’ through covid-19: the gdpr & automated decision-making
publisher Swansea University
series International Journal of Population Data Science
issn 2399-4908
publishDate 2021-04-01
description The UK government announced in March 2020 that it would create an NHS Covid-19 ‘Data Store’ from information routinely collected as part of the health service. This ‘Store’ would use a number of sources of population data to provide a ‘single source of truth’ about the spread of the coronavirus in England. The initiative illustrates the difficulty of relying on automated processing when making healthcare decisions under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The end-product of the store, a number of ‘dashboards’ for decision-makers, was intended to include models and simulations developed through artificial intelligence. Decisions made on the basis of these dashboards would be significant, even (it was suggested) to the point of diverting patients and critical resources between hospitals based on their predictions. How these models will be developed, and externally validated, remains unclear. This is an issue if they are intended to be used for decisions which will affect patients so directly and acutely. We have (by default) a right under the GDPR not to be subject to significant decisions based solely on automated decision-making. It is not obvious, at present, whether resource allocation within the NHS could take place in reliance on this automated modelling. The recent A Level debacle illustrates, in the context of education, the risks of basing life-changing decisions on the national application of a single equation. It is worth considering the potential consequences for the health service if the NHS Data Store is used for resource planning as part of the Covid-19 response.
topic Covid-19
Algorithms
Automated Decision-Making
General Data Protection Regulation
url https://ijpds.org/article/view/1402
work_keys_str_mv AT mirandajanemourby leadingbysciencethroughcovid19thegdprautomateddecisionmaking
_version_ 1721519217928306688