‘Leading by Science’ through Covid-19: the GDPR & Automated Decision-Making
The UK government announced in March 2020 that it would create an NHS Covid-19 ‘Data Store’ from information routinely collected as part of the health service. This ‘Store’ would use a number of sources of population data to provide a ‘single source of truth’ about the spread of the coronavirus in...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Swansea University
2021-04-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Population Data Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ijpds.org/article/view/1402 |
id |
doaj-b916b58156274fc18027d1964b15da5d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b916b58156274fc18027d1964b15da5d2021-04-19T17:10:27ZengSwansea UniversityInternational Journal of Population Data Science2399-49082021-04-015410.23889/ijpds.v5i4.1402‘Leading by Science’ through Covid-19: the GDPR & Automated Decision-MakingMiranda Jane Mourby0Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies, University of Oxford, Ewert House, Oxford, OX2 7DD, UK The UK government announced in March 2020 that it would create an NHS Covid-19 ‘Data Store’ from information routinely collected as part of the health service. This ‘Store’ would use a number of sources of population data to provide a ‘single source of truth’ about the spread of the coronavirus in England. The initiative illustrates the difficulty of relying on automated processing when making healthcare decisions under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The end-product of the store, a number of ‘dashboards’ for decision-makers, was intended to include models and simulations developed through artificial intelligence. Decisions made on the basis of these dashboards would be significant, even (it was suggested) to the point of diverting patients and critical resources between hospitals based on their predictions. How these models will be developed, and externally validated, remains unclear. This is an issue if they are intended to be used for decisions which will affect patients so directly and acutely. We have (by default) a right under the GDPR not to be subject to significant decisions based solely on automated decision-making. It is not obvious, at present, whether resource allocation within the NHS could take place in reliance on this automated modelling. The recent A Level debacle illustrates, in the context of education, the risks of basing life-changing decisions on the national application of a single equation. It is worth considering the potential consequences for the health service if the NHS Data Store is used for resource planning as part of the Covid-19 response. https://ijpds.org/article/view/1402Covid-19AlgorithmsAutomated Decision-MakingGeneral Data Protection Regulation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Miranda Jane Mourby |
spellingShingle |
Miranda Jane Mourby ‘Leading by Science’ through Covid-19: the GDPR & Automated Decision-Making International Journal of Population Data Science Covid-19 Algorithms Automated Decision-Making General Data Protection Regulation |
author_facet |
Miranda Jane Mourby |
author_sort |
Miranda Jane Mourby |
title |
‘Leading by Science’ through Covid-19: the GDPR & Automated Decision-Making |
title_short |
‘Leading by Science’ through Covid-19: the GDPR & Automated Decision-Making |
title_full |
‘Leading by Science’ through Covid-19: the GDPR & Automated Decision-Making |
title_fullStr |
‘Leading by Science’ through Covid-19: the GDPR & Automated Decision-Making |
title_full_unstemmed |
‘Leading by Science’ through Covid-19: the GDPR & Automated Decision-Making |
title_sort |
‘leading by science’ through covid-19: the gdpr & automated decision-making |
publisher |
Swansea University |
series |
International Journal of Population Data Science |
issn |
2399-4908 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
The UK government announced in March 2020 that it would create an NHS Covid-19 ‘Data Store’ from information routinely collected as part of the health service. This ‘Store’ would use a number of sources of population data to provide a ‘single source of truth’ about the spread of the coronavirus in England. The initiative illustrates the difficulty of relying on automated processing when making healthcare decisions under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The end-product of the store, a number of ‘dashboards’ for decision-makers, was intended to include models and simulations developed through artificial intelligence. Decisions made on the basis of these dashboards would be significant, even (it was suggested) to the point of diverting patients and critical resources between hospitals based on their predictions.
How these models will be developed, and externally validated, remains unclear. This is an issue if they are intended to be used for decisions which will affect patients so directly and acutely. We have (by default) a right under the GDPR not to be subject to significant decisions based solely on automated decision-making. It is not obvious, at present, whether resource allocation within the NHS could take place in reliance on this automated modelling. The recent A Level debacle illustrates, in the context of education, the risks of basing life-changing decisions on the national application of a single equation. It is worth considering the potential consequences for the health service if the NHS Data Store is used for resource planning as part of the Covid-19 response.
|
topic |
Covid-19 Algorithms Automated Decision-Making General Data Protection Regulation |
url |
https://ijpds.org/article/view/1402 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mirandajanemourby leadingbysciencethroughcovid19thegdprautomateddecisionmaking |
_version_ |
1721519217928306688 |