Low-Carbon Footprint Hydrogen Production from Natural Gas: A Techno-Economic Analysis of Carbon Capture and Storage from Steam-Methane Reforming
Enabling cost-efficient low-carbon footprint hydrogen production is key to achieve the ambition of the Paris Agreement. This study aims to understand the techno-economic performances of hydrogen production from natural gas without and with carbon capture and storage. A hydrogen plant, based on steam...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Chemical Engineering Transactions |
Online Access: | https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/11111 |
id |
doaj-b9145bee06b7443c960101c95400b024 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b9145bee06b7443c960101c95400b0242021-02-16T11:27:30ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162020-08-018110.3303/CET2081170Low-Carbon Footprint Hydrogen Production from Natural Gas: A Techno-Economic Analysis of Carbon Capture and Storage from Steam-Methane ReformingSimon RoussanalyRahul AnantharamanChao FuEnabling cost-efficient low-carbon footprint hydrogen production is key to achieve the ambition of the Paris Agreement. This study aims to understand the techno-economic performances of hydrogen production from natural gas without and with carbon capture and storage. A hydrogen plant, based on steam-methane reforming and located in Northern Norway, producing 450 t H2/d is here modelled and evaluated. Hydrogen production costs without and with carbon emissions capture and storage of 12.2 and 18.1 c€/Nm3 are obtained. This hydrogen cost increase results in a CO2 avoidance of 67 €/tCO2,avoided. The main contributor to the CO2 avoidance cost is the CO2 capture and conditioning (57 %), while pipeline transport and the storage contribute to 17 % and 26 %. Equally important, a semi-detailed cost breakdown is presented to provide a deeper understanding of the key contributors to the cost of the whole chain and to identify points which if reduced could have the most impact.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/11111 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Simon Roussanaly Rahul Anantharaman Chao Fu |
spellingShingle |
Simon Roussanaly Rahul Anantharaman Chao Fu Low-Carbon Footprint Hydrogen Production from Natural Gas: A Techno-Economic Analysis of Carbon Capture and Storage from Steam-Methane Reforming Chemical Engineering Transactions |
author_facet |
Simon Roussanaly Rahul Anantharaman Chao Fu |
author_sort |
Simon Roussanaly |
title |
Low-Carbon Footprint Hydrogen Production from Natural Gas: A Techno-Economic Analysis of Carbon Capture and Storage from Steam-Methane Reforming |
title_short |
Low-Carbon Footprint Hydrogen Production from Natural Gas: A Techno-Economic Analysis of Carbon Capture and Storage from Steam-Methane Reforming |
title_full |
Low-Carbon Footprint Hydrogen Production from Natural Gas: A Techno-Economic Analysis of Carbon Capture and Storage from Steam-Methane Reforming |
title_fullStr |
Low-Carbon Footprint Hydrogen Production from Natural Gas: A Techno-Economic Analysis of Carbon Capture and Storage from Steam-Methane Reforming |
title_full_unstemmed |
Low-Carbon Footprint Hydrogen Production from Natural Gas: A Techno-Economic Analysis of Carbon Capture and Storage from Steam-Methane Reforming |
title_sort |
low-carbon footprint hydrogen production from natural gas: a techno-economic analysis of carbon capture and storage from steam-methane reforming |
publisher |
AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. |
series |
Chemical Engineering Transactions |
issn |
2283-9216 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
Enabling cost-efficient low-carbon footprint hydrogen production is key to achieve the ambition of the Paris Agreement. This study aims to understand the techno-economic performances of hydrogen production from natural gas without and with carbon capture and storage. A hydrogen plant, based on steam-methane reforming and located in Northern Norway, producing 450 t H2/d is here modelled and evaluated. Hydrogen production costs without and with carbon emissions capture and storage of 12.2 and 18.1 c€/Nm3 are obtained. This hydrogen cost increase results in a CO2 avoidance of 67 €/tCO2,avoided. The main contributor to the CO2 avoidance cost is the CO2 capture and conditioning (57 %), while pipeline transport and the storage contribute to 17 % and 26 %. Equally important, a semi-detailed cost breakdown is presented to provide a deeper understanding of the key contributors to the cost of the whole chain and to identify points which if reduced could have the most impact. |
url |
https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/11111 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT simonroussanaly lowcarbonfootprinthydrogenproductionfromnaturalgasatechnoeconomicanalysisofcarboncaptureandstoragefromsteammethanereforming AT rahulanantharaman lowcarbonfootprinthydrogenproductionfromnaturalgasatechnoeconomicanalysisofcarboncaptureandstoragefromsteammethanereforming AT chaofu lowcarbonfootprinthydrogenproductionfromnaturalgasatechnoeconomicanalysisofcarboncaptureandstoragefromsteammethanereforming |
_version_ |
1724267825540890624 |