The Difference of Science Learning Outcome Using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning Models
The aim of this research is to determine the difference of science learning outcome between the application of Think Talk Write and Think Pair Share learning models. The research method was a quasi-experimental. The sample of this research were 34 students for first experiment group (VA) and 28 stud...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
UHAMKA Press
2017-07-01
|
Series: | Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar |
Online Access: | http://jipd.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jipd/article/view/52 |
id |
doaj-b9143ea4ecac4bc4849d5ad2315627f6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b9143ea4ecac4bc4849d5ad2315627f62020-11-25T00:06:37ZengUHAMKA PressJurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar2477-38592477-35812017-07-0122677452The Difference of Science Learning Outcome Using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning ModelsAnnisa Restu Wardhany0Gufron Amirullah1Sekolah Dasar Islam Al-FikriUniversitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKAThe aim of this research is to determine the difference of science learning outcome between the application of Think Talk Write and Think Pair Share learning models. The research method was a quasi-experimental. The sample of this research were 34 students for first experiment group (VA) and 28 students for second experiment group (VB). Sampling technique was a saturated sampling. The data was collected using multiple choice test that was consist of 30 questions with four choice for the answer. The normality of posttest data was analyzed by using Liliefors test which obtained that both of two experiment groups were normal distributed and the homogeneity of posttest data was analyzed by using Fisher test which obtained that both of them had a similar variance. Based on t-test result, tobs was obtained 3.46 and ttable was obtained 2.00 with df = 60 and alpha = 0.05, therefore, H0 was rejected. The result of this research can be concluded that there was a significant difference of science learning outcome between the application of Think Talk Write and Think Pair Share learning models.http://jipd.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jipd/article/view/52 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Annisa Restu Wardhany Gufron Amirullah |
spellingShingle |
Annisa Restu Wardhany Gufron Amirullah The Difference of Science Learning Outcome Using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning Models Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar |
author_facet |
Annisa Restu Wardhany Gufron Amirullah |
author_sort |
Annisa Restu Wardhany |
title |
The Difference of Science Learning Outcome Using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning Models |
title_short |
The Difference of Science Learning Outcome Using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning Models |
title_full |
The Difference of Science Learning Outcome Using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning Models |
title_fullStr |
The Difference of Science Learning Outcome Using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning Models |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Difference of Science Learning Outcome Using Think Talk Write (TTW) and Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning Models |
title_sort |
difference of science learning outcome using think talk write (ttw) and think pair share (tps) learning models |
publisher |
UHAMKA Press |
series |
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar |
issn |
2477-3859 2477-3581 |
publishDate |
2017-07-01 |
description |
The aim of this research is to determine the difference of science learning outcome between the application of Think Talk Write and Think Pair Share learning models. The research method was a quasi-experimental. The sample of this research were 34 students for first experiment group (VA) and 28 students for second experiment group (VB). Sampling technique was a saturated sampling. The data was collected using multiple choice test that was consist of 30 questions with four choice for the answer. The normality of posttest data was analyzed by using Liliefors test which obtained that both of two experiment groups were normal distributed and the homogeneity of posttest data was analyzed by using Fisher test which obtained that both of them had a similar variance. Based on t-test result, tobs was obtained 3.46 and ttable was obtained 2.00 with df = 60 and alpha = 0.05, therefore, H0 was rejected. The result of this research can be concluded that there was a significant difference of science learning outcome between the application of Think Talk Write and Think Pair Share learning models. |
url |
http://jipd.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/jipd/article/view/52 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annisarestuwardhany thedifferenceofsciencelearningoutcomeusingthinktalkwritettwandthinkpairsharetpslearningmodels AT gufronamirullah thedifferenceofsciencelearningoutcomeusingthinktalkwritettwandthinkpairsharetpslearningmodels AT annisarestuwardhany differenceofsciencelearningoutcomeusingthinktalkwritettwandthinkpairsharetpslearningmodels AT gufronamirullah differenceofsciencelearningoutcomeusingthinktalkwritettwandthinkpairsharetpslearningmodels |
_version_ |
1725421092873437184 |