Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress
Abstract Objective: Economic abuse is a form of domestic violence that has a significant impact on the health and financial wellbeing of victims, but is understudied. This study determined the lifetime prevalence of economic abuse in Australia by age and gender, and the associated risk factors. Meth...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12651 |
id |
doaj-b9008a1e76e249c4ab4ae869c0718611 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b9008a1e76e249c4ab4ae869c07186112020-11-24T21:26:39ZengWileyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health1326-02001753-64052017-06-0141326927410.1111/1753-6405.12651Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stressJozica Kutin0Roslyn Russell1Mike Reid2School of Economics, Finance and Marketing RMIT University VictoriaSchool of Economics, Finance and Marketing RMIT University VictoriaSchool of Economics, Finance and Marketing RMIT University VictoriaAbstract Objective: Economic abuse is a form of domestic violence that has a significant impact on the health and financial wellbeing of victims, but is understudied. This study determined the lifetime prevalence of economic abuse in Australia by age and gender, and the associated risk factors. Methods: The 2012 ABS Personal Safety Survey was used, involving a cross‐sectional population survey of 17,050 randomly selected adults using face‐to‐face interviews. The survey‐weighted prevalence of economic abuse was calculated and analysed by age and gender. Logistic regression was used to adjust odds ratios for possible confounding between variables. Results: The lifetime prevalence of economic abuse in the whole sample was 11.5%. Women in all age groups were more likely to experience economic abuse (15.7%) compared to men (7.1%). Disability, health and financial stress status were significant markers of economic abuse. Conclusions: For women, financial stress and disability were important markers of economic abuse. However, prevalence rates were influenced by the measures used and victims' awareness of the abuse, which presents a challenge for screening and monitoring. Implications for public health: Social, health and financial services need to be aware of and screen for the warning signs of this largely hidden form of domestic violence.https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12651economic abusefinancial abuseviolencegenderfinancial stress |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jozica Kutin Roslyn Russell Mike Reid |
spellingShingle |
Jozica Kutin Roslyn Russell Mike Reid Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health economic abuse financial abuse violence gender financial stress |
author_facet |
Jozica Kutin Roslyn Russell Mike Reid |
author_sort |
Jozica Kutin |
title |
Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress |
title_short |
Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress |
title_full |
Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress |
title_fullStr |
Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress |
title_sort |
economic abuse between intimate partners in australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health |
issn |
1326-0200 1753-6405 |
publishDate |
2017-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Objective: Economic abuse is a form of domestic violence that has a significant impact on the health and financial wellbeing of victims, but is understudied. This study determined the lifetime prevalence of economic abuse in Australia by age and gender, and the associated risk factors. Methods: The 2012 ABS Personal Safety Survey was used, involving a cross‐sectional population survey of 17,050 randomly selected adults using face‐to‐face interviews. The survey‐weighted prevalence of economic abuse was calculated and analysed by age and gender. Logistic regression was used to adjust odds ratios for possible confounding between variables. Results: The lifetime prevalence of economic abuse in the whole sample was 11.5%. Women in all age groups were more likely to experience economic abuse (15.7%) compared to men (7.1%). Disability, health and financial stress status were significant markers of economic abuse. Conclusions: For women, financial stress and disability were important markers of economic abuse. However, prevalence rates were influenced by the measures used and victims' awareness of the abuse, which presents a challenge for screening and monitoring. Implications for public health: Social, health and financial services need to be aware of and screen for the warning signs of this largely hidden form of domestic violence. |
topic |
economic abuse financial abuse violence gender financial stress |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12651 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jozicakutin economicabusebetweenintimatepartnersinaustraliaprevalencehealthstatusdisabilityandfinancialstress AT roslynrussell economicabusebetweenintimatepartnersinaustraliaprevalencehealthstatusdisabilityandfinancialstress AT mikereid economicabusebetweenintimatepartnersinaustraliaprevalencehealthstatusdisabilityandfinancialstress |
_version_ |
1725978271234916352 |