Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress

Abstract Objective: Economic abuse is a form of domestic violence that has a significant impact on the health and financial wellbeing of victims, but is understudied. This study determined the lifetime prevalence of economic abuse in Australia by age and gender, and the associated risk factors. Meth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jozica Kutin, Roslyn Russell, Mike Reid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-06-01
Series:Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12651
id doaj-b9008a1e76e249c4ab4ae869c0718611
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b9008a1e76e249c4ab4ae869c07186112020-11-24T21:26:39ZengWileyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health1326-02001753-64052017-06-0141326927410.1111/1753-6405.12651Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stressJozica Kutin0Roslyn Russell1Mike Reid2School of Economics, Finance and Marketing RMIT University VictoriaSchool of Economics, Finance and Marketing RMIT University VictoriaSchool of Economics, Finance and Marketing RMIT University VictoriaAbstract Objective: Economic abuse is a form of domestic violence that has a significant impact on the health and financial wellbeing of victims, but is understudied. This study determined the lifetime prevalence of economic abuse in Australia by age and gender, and the associated risk factors. Methods: The 2012 ABS Personal Safety Survey was used, involving a cross‐sectional population survey of 17,050 randomly selected adults using face‐to‐face interviews. The survey‐weighted prevalence of economic abuse was calculated and analysed by age and gender. Logistic regression was used to adjust odds ratios for possible confounding between variables. Results: The lifetime prevalence of economic abuse in the whole sample was 11.5%. Women in all age groups were more likely to experience economic abuse (15.7%) compared to men (7.1%). Disability, health and financial stress status were significant markers of economic abuse. Conclusions: For women, financial stress and disability were important markers of economic abuse. However, prevalence rates were influenced by the measures used and victims' awareness of the abuse, which presents a challenge for screening and monitoring. Implications for public health: Social, health and financial services need to be aware of and screen for the warning signs of this largely hidden form of domestic violence.https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12651economic abusefinancial abuseviolencegenderfinancial stress
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jozica Kutin
Roslyn Russell
Mike Reid
spellingShingle Jozica Kutin
Roslyn Russell
Mike Reid
Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
economic abuse
financial abuse
violence
gender
financial stress
author_facet Jozica Kutin
Roslyn Russell
Mike Reid
author_sort Jozica Kutin
title Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress
title_short Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress
title_full Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress
title_fullStr Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress
title_full_unstemmed Economic abuse between intimate partners in Australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress
title_sort economic abuse between intimate partners in australia: prevalence, health status, disability and financial stress
publisher Wiley
series Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
issn 1326-0200
1753-6405
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Abstract Objective: Economic abuse is a form of domestic violence that has a significant impact on the health and financial wellbeing of victims, but is understudied. This study determined the lifetime prevalence of economic abuse in Australia by age and gender, and the associated risk factors. Methods: The 2012 ABS Personal Safety Survey was used, involving a cross‐sectional population survey of 17,050 randomly selected adults using face‐to‐face interviews. The survey‐weighted prevalence of economic abuse was calculated and analysed by age and gender. Logistic regression was used to adjust odds ratios for possible confounding between variables. Results: The lifetime prevalence of economic abuse in the whole sample was 11.5%. Women in all age groups were more likely to experience economic abuse (15.7%) compared to men (7.1%). Disability, health and financial stress status were significant markers of economic abuse. Conclusions: For women, financial stress and disability were important markers of economic abuse. However, prevalence rates were influenced by the measures used and victims' awareness of the abuse, which presents a challenge for screening and monitoring. Implications for public health: Social, health and financial services need to be aware of and screen for the warning signs of this largely hidden form of domestic violence.
topic economic abuse
financial abuse
violence
gender
financial stress
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12651
work_keys_str_mv AT jozicakutin economicabusebetweenintimatepartnersinaustraliaprevalencehealthstatusdisabilityandfinancialstress
AT roslynrussell economicabusebetweenintimatepartnersinaustraliaprevalencehealthstatusdisabilityandfinancialstress
AT mikereid economicabusebetweenintimatepartnersinaustraliaprevalencehealthstatusdisabilityandfinancialstress
_version_ 1725978271234916352