Institutional Logics at Play in a Mobility-as-a-Service Ecosystem

The last decade has brought the transport sector to the forefront of discussions on sustainability and digital innovations: practitioners, researchers, and regulators alike have witnessed the emergence of a wide diversity of shared mobility services. Based on a longitudinal case study of a regional...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hugo Guyader, Brenda Nansubuga, Karin Skill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8285
id doaj-b8db413d3d7547f0bfaac11424a3b236
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b8db413d3d7547f0bfaac11424a3b2362021-08-06T15:32:29ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-07-01138285828510.3390/su13158285Institutional Logics at Play in a Mobility-as-a-Service EcosystemHugo Guyader0Brenda Nansubuga1Karin Skill2Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, SwedenDepartment of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, SwedenDepartment of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, SwedenThe last decade has brought the transport sector to the forefront of discussions on sustainability and digital innovations: practitioners, researchers, and regulators alike have witnessed the emergence of a wide diversity of shared mobility services. Based on a longitudinal case study of a regional Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) ecosystem in Sweden, constituted of a document analysis and 24 semi-structured interviews with 18 representatives from regional authorities, mobility service providers, and other stakeholders from the public and private sectors, this study examines the co-existing and competing institutional logics at play, identified as State logic, Market logic, Sustainability logic, Experimental logic, and Service logic. The analysis reveals that these institutional logics pertain to tensions in the collaboration within the ecosystem’s stakeholders in terms of: (1) finding a common vision and scope for MaaS, (2) establishing a sustainable business model, (3) triggering a behavioral change regarding car travel, (4) being able to find one’s role within the project and to consequently collaborate with other stakeholders, and (5) managing uncertainty through testing and experimenting innovative solutions, which ultimately yielded key learnings about MaaS and the shared mobility ecosystem and its stakeholders. These case study findings, based on an institutional logics framework, provide a novel perspective on emerging ecosystems, from which implications for MaaS developers and further research on shared mobility are drawn.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8285institutional logicsMaaSpublic–private partnershipsshared mobilitysustainability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hugo Guyader
Brenda Nansubuga
Karin Skill
spellingShingle Hugo Guyader
Brenda Nansubuga
Karin Skill
Institutional Logics at Play in a Mobility-as-a-Service Ecosystem
Sustainability
institutional logics
MaaS
public–private partnerships
shared mobility
sustainability
author_facet Hugo Guyader
Brenda Nansubuga
Karin Skill
author_sort Hugo Guyader
title Institutional Logics at Play in a Mobility-as-a-Service Ecosystem
title_short Institutional Logics at Play in a Mobility-as-a-Service Ecosystem
title_full Institutional Logics at Play in a Mobility-as-a-Service Ecosystem
title_fullStr Institutional Logics at Play in a Mobility-as-a-Service Ecosystem
title_full_unstemmed Institutional Logics at Play in a Mobility-as-a-Service Ecosystem
title_sort institutional logics at play in a mobility-as-a-service ecosystem
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-07-01
description The last decade has brought the transport sector to the forefront of discussions on sustainability and digital innovations: practitioners, researchers, and regulators alike have witnessed the emergence of a wide diversity of shared mobility services. Based on a longitudinal case study of a regional Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) ecosystem in Sweden, constituted of a document analysis and 24 semi-structured interviews with 18 representatives from regional authorities, mobility service providers, and other stakeholders from the public and private sectors, this study examines the co-existing and competing institutional logics at play, identified as State logic, Market logic, Sustainability logic, Experimental logic, and Service logic. The analysis reveals that these institutional logics pertain to tensions in the collaboration within the ecosystem’s stakeholders in terms of: (1) finding a common vision and scope for MaaS, (2) establishing a sustainable business model, (3) triggering a behavioral change regarding car travel, (4) being able to find one’s role within the project and to consequently collaborate with other stakeholders, and (5) managing uncertainty through testing and experimenting innovative solutions, which ultimately yielded key learnings about MaaS and the shared mobility ecosystem and its stakeholders. These case study findings, based on an institutional logics framework, provide a novel perspective on emerging ecosystems, from which implications for MaaS developers and further research on shared mobility are drawn.
topic institutional logics
MaaS
public–private partnerships
shared mobility
sustainability
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8285
work_keys_str_mv AT hugoguyader institutionallogicsatplayinamobilityasaserviceecosystem
AT brendanansubuga institutionallogicsatplayinamobilityasaserviceecosystem
AT karinskill institutionallogicsatplayinamobilityasaserviceecosystem
_version_ 1721217511101300736