Ethnographie und ihre Folgen für die Kulturgeographie: eine Kritik des Netzwerkkonzepts in Studien zu translokaler Mobilität

The aim of this article is to show the difference between an interpretative-hermeneutic ethnographic approach deeply embedded in the history of anthropology and ethnographic methods introduced as part of a social science repertoire. Taking the classical "network" as an example, it contrast...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: J. Verne
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Copernicus Publications 2013-03-01
Series:Geographica Helvetica
Online Access:http://www.geogr-helv.net/67/185/2012/gh-67-185-2012.pdf
id doaj-b8c6a87a1205476782e8898e62f435bb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b8c6a87a1205476782e8898e62f435bb2020-11-24T21:45:01ZdeuCopernicus PublicationsGeographica Helvetica0016-73122194-87982013-03-0167418519410.5194/gh-67-185-2012Ethnographie und ihre Folgen für die Kulturgeographie: eine Kritik des Netzwerkkonzepts in Studien zu translokaler MobilitätJ. Verne0Department of Human Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, GermanyThe aim of this article is to show the difference between an interpretative-hermeneutic ethnographic approach deeply embedded in the history of anthropology and ethnographic methods introduced as part of a social science repertoire. Taking the classical "network" as an example, it contrasts the way this concept is generally used in studies on translocal mobility with interpretations of ethnographic research. This not only opens up critical reflections on the role of "networks" when it comes to understanding translocality as a lived experience, but also illustrates what it actually means to follow an interpretative-hermeneutic approach in which ethnographic material is seen to serve as a way to ground, question and refine abstract concepts. The article thus argues that it is through ethnographies and their inherent openness towards the field that a more enriching and creative engagement with theories and methodologies can be achieved than qualitative social science approaches usually allow for.http://www.geogr-helv.net/67/185/2012/gh-67-185-2012.pdf
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Verne
spellingShingle J. Verne
Ethnographie und ihre Folgen für die Kulturgeographie: eine Kritik des Netzwerkkonzepts in Studien zu translokaler Mobilität
Geographica Helvetica
author_facet J. Verne
author_sort J. Verne
title Ethnographie und ihre Folgen für die Kulturgeographie: eine Kritik des Netzwerkkonzepts in Studien zu translokaler Mobilität
title_short Ethnographie und ihre Folgen für die Kulturgeographie: eine Kritik des Netzwerkkonzepts in Studien zu translokaler Mobilität
title_full Ethnographie und ihre Folgen für die Kulturgeographie: eine Kritik des Netzwerkkonzepts in Studien zu translokaler Mobilität
title_fullStr Ethnographie und ihre Folgen für die Kulturgeographie: eine Kritik des Netzwerkkonzepts in Studien zu translokaler Mobilität
title_full_unstemmed Ethnographie und ihre Folgen für die Kulturgeographie: eine Kritik des Netzwerkkonzepts in Studien zu translokaler Mobilität
title_sort ethnographie und ihre folgen für die kulturgeographie: eine kritik des netzwerkkonzepts in studien zu translokaler mobilität
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Geographica Helvetica
issn 0016-7312
2194-8798
publishDate 2013-03-01
description The aim of this article is to show the difference between an interpretative-hermeneutic ethnographic approach deeply embedded in the history of anthropology and ethnographic methods introduced as part of a social science repertoire. Taking the classical "network" as an example, it contrasts the way this concept is generally used in studies on translocal mobility with interpretations of ethnographic research. This not only opens up critical reflections on the role of "networks" when it comes to understanding translocality as a lived experience, but also illustrates what it actually means to follow an interpretative-hermeneutic approach in which ethnographic material is seen to serve as a way to ground, question and refine abstract concepts. The article thus argues that it is through ethnographies and their inherent openness towards the field that a more enriching and creative engagement with theories and methodologies can be achieved than qualitative social science approaches usually allow for.
url http://www.geogr-helv.net/67/185/2012/gh-67-185-2012.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jverne ethnographieundihrefolgenfurdiekulturgeographieeinekritikdesnetzwerkkonzeptsinstudienzutranslokalermobilitat
_version_ 1725907128734973952