Volume production in different silvicultural systems for 85 years in a mixed <i>Picea abies–Pinus sylvestris</i> forest in central Sweden

A long-term comparison of different silvicultural systems was established in 1923 in central Sweden, in an uneven-aged mixed Norway spruceâScots pine forest ( (L.) Karst. â L.) with about 85% spruce and 15% pine. The five treatments consisted of two examples of even-aged management 1) cl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lundqvist, Lars, Spreer, Susanne, Karlsson, Christer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Society of Forest Science 2013-01-01
Series:Silva Fennica
Online Access:https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/897
id doaj-b8c0aa452a8f428d96e53574e7802fa9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b8c0aa452a8f428d96e53574e7802fa92020-11-25T02:24:33ZengFinnish Society of Forest ScienceSilva Fennica2242-40752013-01-0147110.14214/sf.897Volume production in different silvicultural systems for 85 years in a mixed <i>Picea abies–Pinus sylvestris</i> forest in central SwedenLundqvist, LarsSpreer, SusanneKarlsson, Christer A long-term comparison of different silvicultural systems was established in 1923 in central Sweden, in an uneven-aged mixed Norway spruceâScots pine forest ( (L.) Karst. â L.) with about 85% spruce and 15% pine. The five treatments consisted of two examples of even-aged management 1) clear-cutting followed by planting, and 2) seed tree regeneration, one uneven-aged management 3) selection system, one exploiting treatment 4) diameter limit cut, and 5) one untreated control plot. Each treatment plot was 1 ha, 100 m à 100 m. The plots were measured and managed at irregular intervals, ranging from 7 to 15 years. In 2007â2008 the even-aged treatments and the diameter limit cut were repeated and a new rotation started. Mean annual volume increment during the whole observation period differed widely between the treatments, partly because of differences in species composition over time, with treatment clear-cutting followed by planting at the top, and the control at the bottom. Treatment selection system gave only about 60% of planting, but this was probably largely an effect of too small growing stock during the first roughly 50 years. When the growing stock was increased, periodic annual volume increment increased to about 80% of the mean annual volume increment in the even-aged, planted plot.Picea abiesPinus sylvestrishttps://www.silvafennica.fi/article/897
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lundqvist, Lars
Spreer, Susanne
Karlsson, Christer
spellingShingle Lundqvist, Lars
Spreer, Susanne
Karlsson, Christer
Volume production in different silvicultural systems for 85 years in a mixed <i>Picea abies–Pinus sylvestris</i> forest in central Sweden
Silva Fennica
author_facet Lundqvist, Lars
Spreer, Susanne
Karlsson, Christer
author_sort Lundqvist, Lars
title Volume production in different silvicultural systems for 85 years in a mixed <i>Picea abies–Pinus sylvestris</i> forest in central Sweden
title_short Volume production in different silvicultural systems for 85 years in a mixed <i>Picea abies–Pinus sylvestris</i> forest in central Sweden
title_full Volume production in different silvicultural systems for 85 years in a mixed <i>Picea abies–Pinus sylvestris</i> forest in central Sweden
title_fullStr Volume production in different silvicultural systems for 85 years in a mixed <i>Picea abies–Pinus sylvestris</i> forest in central Sweden
title_full_unstemmed Volume production in different silvicultural systems for 85 years in a mixed <i>Picea abies–Pinus sylvestris</i> forest in central Sweden
title_sort volume production in different silvicultural systems for 85 years in a mixed <i>picea abies–pinus sylvestris</i> forest in central sweden
publisher Finnish Society of Forest Science
series Silva Fennica
issn 2242-4075
publishDate 2013-01-01
description A long-term comparison of different silvicultural systems was established in 1923 in central Sweden, in an uneven-aged mixed Norway spruceâScots pine forest ( (L.) Karst. â L.) with about 85% spruce and 15% pine. The five treatments consisted of two examples of even-aged management 1) clear-cutting followed by planting, and 2) seed tree regeneration, one uneven-aged management 3) selection system, one exploiting treatment 4) diameter limit cut, and 5) one untreated control plot. Each treatment plot was 1 ha, 100 m à 100 m. The plots were measured and managed at irregular intervals, ranging from 7 to 15 years. In 2007â2008 the even-aged treatments and the diameter limit cut were repeated and a new rotation started. Mean annual volume increment during the whole observation period differed widely between the treatments, partly because of differences in species composition over time, with treatment clear-cutting followed by planting at the top, and the control at the bottom. Treatment selection system gave only about 60% of planting, but this was probably largely an effect of too small growing stock during the first roughly 50 years. When the growing stock was increased, periodic annual volume increment increased to about 80% of the mean annual volume increment in the even-aged, planted plot.Picea abiesPinus sylvestris
url https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/897
work_keys_str_mv AT lundqvistlars volumeproductionindifferentsilviculturalsystemsfor85yearsinamixedipiceaabiespinussylvestrisiforestincentralsweden
AT spreersusanne volumeproductionindifferentsilviculturalsystemsfor85yearsinamixedipiceaabiespinussylvestrisiforestincentralsweden
AT karlssonchrister volumeproductionindifferentsilviculturalsystemsfor85yearsinamixedipiceaabiespinussylvestrisiforestincentralsweden
_version_ 1715493845433581568