Applying a logical theory of change for strengthening research uptake in policy: a case study of the Evidence Informed Decision Making Network of the Caribbean

Objective. Health policymakers in the Caribbean face challenges with research use in ­decision-making. Although copious approaches to strengthen evidence-informed policy can be found in the literature, these strategies should be applied and evaluated in specific settings. We developed a theory of ch...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrea C. Yearwood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pan American Health Organization 2018-08-01
Series:Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
Subjects:
Online Access:http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/49155
id doaj-b8aa654f2a7e476fac2fa113534cbcfb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b8aa654f2a7e476fac2fa113534cbcfb2020-11-25T02:31:02ZengPan American Health OrganizationRevista Panamericana de Salud Pública1020-49891680-53482018-08-01421910.26633/RPSP.2018.91e91Applying a logical theory of change for strengthening research uptake in policy: a case study of the Evidence Informed Decision Making Network of the CaribbeanAndrea C. Yearwood0Caribbean Public Health Agency, Policy Planning and Research Department, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago.Objective. Health policymakers in the Caribbean face challenges with research use in ­decision-making. Although copious approaches to strengthen evidence-informed policy can be found in the literature, these strategies should be applied and evaluated in specific settings. We developed a theory of change for strengthening research uptake in health policy, and the ­interventions were implemented as the Evidence Informed Decision Making Network of the Caribbean (EvIDeNCe). We assessed the model's logic and evaluated whether the expected outcome was achieved. Methods. The model was mapped in three stages: problem identification; goal ­determination; and backward linking of interventions. Beneficiaries were surveyed to assess the design logic and to evaluate the main outcome. Results. A total of 137 respondents completed evaluation questionnaires. The ­inclusion of evidence briefs, stakeholder dialogues, a research database, and training ­programs for policymakers in the model was validated. Respondents also reported their intention to act on research evidence to which they were exposed. After respondents had participated in stakeholder dialogues, the mean intention-to-use score was 6.4 on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), and 6.3 on the same scale, after exposure to training. Conclusions. This work provides initial validation of EvIDeNCe as a consolidated strategy to strengthen the application of research in policy in the Caribbean. To our knowledge, it is the first study to develop and apply a comprehensive model of this type to the Caribbean. The findings support results from similar initiatives in other countries, but additional work is needed to evaluate the overall impact of the initiative.http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/49155Translational medical researchhealth policyhealth systemsWest Indies
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrea C. Yearwood
spellingShingle Andrea C. Yearwood
Applying a logical theory of change for strengthening research uptake in policy: a case study of the Evidence Informed Decision Making Network of the Caribbean
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
Translational medical research
health policy
health systems
West Indies
author_facet Andrea C. Yearwood
author_sort Andrea C. Yearwood
title Applying a logical theory of change for strengthening research uptake in policy: a case study of the Evidence Informed Decision Making Network of the Caribbean
title_short Applying a logical theory of change for strengthening research uptake in policy: a case study of the Evidence Informed Decision Making Network of the Caribbean
title_full Applying a logical theory of change for strengthening research uptake in policy: a case study of the Evidence Informed Decision Making Network of the Caribbean
title_fullStr Applying a logical theory of change for strengthening research uptake in policy: a case study of the Evidence Informed Decision Making Network of the Caribbean
title_full_unstemmed Applying a logical theory of change for strengthening research uptake in policy: a case study of the Evidence Informed Decision Making Network of the Caribbean
title_sort applying a logical theory of change for strengthening research uptake in policy: a case study of the evidence informed decision making network of the caribbean
publisher Pan American Health Organization
series Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
issn 1020-4989
1680-5348
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Objective. Health policymakers in the Caribbean face challenges with research use in ­decision-making. Although copious approaches to strengthen evidence-informed policy can be found in the literature, these strategies should be applied and evaluated in specific settings. We developed a theory of change for strengthening research uptake in health policy, and the ­interventions were implemented as the Evidence Informed Decision Making Network of the Caribbean (EvIDeNCe). We assessed the model's logic and evaluated whether the expected outcome was achieved. Methods. The model was mapped in three stages: problem identification; goal ­determination; and backward linking of interventions. Beneficiaries were surveyed to assess the design logic and to evaluate the main outcome. Results. A total of 137 respondents completed evaluation questionnaires. The ­inclusion of evidence briefs, stakeholder dialogues, a research database, and training ­programs for policymakers in the model was validated. Respondents also reported their intention to act on research evidence to which they were exposed. After respondents had participated in stakeholder dialogues, the mean intention-to-use score was 6.4 on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), and 6.3 on the same scale, after exposure to training. Conclusions. This work provides initial validation of EvIDeNCe as a consolidated strategy to strengthen the application of research in policy in the Caribbean. To our knowledge, it is the first study to develop and apply a comprehensive model of this type to the Caribbean. The findings support results from similar initiatives in other countries, but additional work is needed to evaluate the overall impact of the initiative.
topic Translational medical research
health policy
health systems
West Indies
url http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/49155
work_keys_str_mv AT andreacyearwood applyingalogicaltheoryofchangeforstrengtheningresearchuptakeinpolicyacasestudyoftheevidenceinformeddecisionmakingnetworkofthecaribbean
_version_ 1724825755774353408