Comparison of Mechanical Impedance Methods for Vibration Simulation

The work presented here explored the detrimental consequences that resulted when mechanical impedance effects were not considered in relating vibration test requirements with field measurements. The ways in which these effects can be considered were evaluated, and comparison of three impedance metho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeffrey A. Gatscher, Grzegorz Kawiecki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 1996-01-01
Series:Shock and Vibration
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SAV-1996-3308
id doaj-b89c06908f7046dba90e814392d1186f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b89c06908f7046dba90e814392d1186f2020-11-24T23:08:36ZengHindawi LimitedShock and Vibration1070-96221875-92031996-01-013322323210.3233/SAV-1996-3308Comparison of Mechanical Impedance Methods for Vibration SimulationJeffrey A. Gatscher0Grzegorz Kawiecki1Raytheon Company, Bristol, TN 37620, USAThe University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USAThe work presented here explored the detrimental consequences that resulted when mechanical impedance effects were not considered in relating vibration test requirements with field measurements. The ways in which these effects can be considered were evaluated, and comparison of three impedance methods was accomplished based on a cumulative damage criterion. A test structure was used to simulate an equipment and support foundation system. Detailed finite element analysis was performed to aid in computation of cumulative damage totals. The results indicate that mechanical impedance methods can be effectively used to reproduce the field vibration environment in a laboratory test. The establishment of validated computer models, coupled with laboratory impedance measurements, can eliminate the overtesting problems inherent with constant motion, infinite impedance testing strategies.http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SAV-1996-3308
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jeffrey A. Gatscher
Grzegorz Kawiecki
spellingShingle Jeffrey A. Gatscher
Grzegorz Kawiecki
Comparison of Mechanical Impedance Methods for Vibration Simulation
Shock and Vibration
author_facet Jeffrey A. Gatscher
Grzegorz Kawiecki
author_sort Jeffrey A. Gatscher
title Comparison of Mechanical Impedance Methods for Vibration Simulation
title_short Comparison of Mechanical Impedance Methods for Vibration Simulation
title_full Comparison of Mechanical Impedance Methods for Vibration Simulation
title_fullStr Comparison of Mechanical Impedance Methods for Vibration Simulation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Mechanical Impedance Methods for Vibration Simulation
title_sort comparison of mechanical impedance methods for vibration simulation
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Shock and Vibration
issn 1070-9622
1875-9203
publishDate 1996-01-01
description The work presented here explored the detrimental consequences that resulted when mechanical impedance effects were not considered in relating vibration test requirements with field measurements. The ways in which these effects can be considered were evaluated, and comparison of three impedance methods was accomplished based on a cumulative damage criterion. A test structure was used to simulate an equipment and support foundation system. Detailed finite element analysis was performed to aid in computation of cumulative damage totals. The results indicate that mechanical impedance methods can be effectively used to reproduce the field vibration environment in a laboratory test. The establishment of validated computer models, coupled with laboratory impedance measurements, can eliminate the overtesting problems inherent with constant motion, infinite impedance testing strategies.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SAV-1996-3308
work_keys_str_mv AT jeffreyagatscher comparisonofmechanicalimpedancemethodsforvibrationsimulation
AT grzegorzkawiecki comparisonofmechanicalimpedancemethodsforvibrationsimulation
_version_ 1725613392010412032