A Comparative Study on Removal of Hazardous Anions from Water by Adsorption: A Review

This paper presents a comparative review of arsenite (As(III)), arsenate (As(V)), and fluoride (F−) for a better understanding of the conditions and factors during their adsorption with focus on (i) the isotherm adsorption models, (ii) effects of pH, (iii) effects of ionic strength, and (iv) effects...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yasinta John, Victor Emery David, Daniel Mmereki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:International Journal of Chemical Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3975948
id doaj-b8778727d1cd4bd1b1a3620b39de292f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b8778727d1cd4bd1b1a3620b39de292f2021-07-02T05:46:14ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Chemical Engineering1687-806X1687-80782018-01-01201810.1155/2018/39759483975948A Comparative Study on Removal of Hazardous Anions from Water by Adsorption: A ReviewYasinta John0Victor Emery David1Daniel Mmereki2College of Urban Construction and Environmental Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, ChinaCollege of Urban Construction and Environmental Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, ChinaNational Centre for International Research of Low-Carbon and Green Buildings, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, ChinaThis paper presents a comparative review of arsenite (As(III)), arsenate (As(V)), and fluoride (F−) for a better understanding of the conditions and factors during their adsorption with focus on (i) the isotherm adsorption models, (ii) effects of pH, (iii) effects of ionic strength, and (iv) effects of coexisting substances such as anions, cations, and natural organics matter. It provides an in-depth analysis of various methods of arsenite (As(III)), arsenate (As(V)), and fluoride (F-) removal by adsorption and the anions’ characteristics during the adsorption process. The surface area of the adsorbents does not contribute to the adsorption capacity of these anions but rather a combination of other physical and chemical properties. The adsorption capacity for the anions depends on the combination of all the factors: pH, ionic strength, coexisting substances, pore volume and particles size, surface modification, pretreatment of the adsorbents, and so forth. Extreme higher adsorption capacity can be obtained by the modification of the adsorbents. In general, pH has a greater influence on adsorption capacity at large, since it affects the ionic strength, coexisting anions such as bicarbonate, sulfate, and silica, the surface charges of the adsorbents, and the ionic species which can be present in the solution.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3975948
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yasinta John
Victor Emery David
Daniel Mmereki
spellingShingle Yasinta John
Victor Emery David
Daniel Mmereki
A Comparative Study on Removal of Hazardous Anions from Water by Adsorption: A Review
International Journal of Chemical Engineering
author_facet Yasinta John
Victor Emery David
Daniel Mmereki
author_sort Yasinta John
title A Comparative Study on Removal of Hazardous Anions from Water by Adsorption: A Review
title_short A Comparative Study on Removal of Hazardous Anions from Water by Adsorption: A Review
title_full A Comparative Study on Removal of Hazardous Anions from Water by Adsorption: A Review
title_fullStr A Comparative Study on Removal of Hazardous Anions from Water by Adsorption: A Review
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study on Removal of Hazardous Anions from Water by Adsorption: A Review
title_sort comparative study on removal of hazardous anions from water by adsorption: a review
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Chemical Engineering
issn 1687-806X
1687-8078
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This paper presents a comparative review of arsenite (As(III)), arsenate (As(V)), and fluoride (F−) for a better understanding of the conditions and factors during their adsorption with focus on (i) the isotherm adsorption models, (ii) effects of pH, (iii) effects of ionic strength, and (iv) effects of coexisting substances such as anions, cations, and natural organics matter. It provides an in-depth analysis of various methods of arsenite (As(III)), arsenate (As(V)), and fluoride (F-) removal by adsorption and the anions’ characteristics during the adsorption process. The surface area of the adsorbents does not contribute to the adsorption capacity of these anions but rather a combination of other physical and chemical properties. The adsorption capacity for the anions depends on the combination of all the factors: pH, ionic strength, coexisting substances, pore volume and particles size, surface modification, pretreatment of the adsorbents, and so forth. Extreme higher adsorption capacity can be obtained by the modification of the adsorbents. In general, pH has a greater influence on adsorption capacity at large, since it affects the ionic strength, coexisting anions such as bicarbonate, sulfate, and silica, the surface charges of the adsorbents, and the ionic species which can be present in the solution.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3975948
work_keys_str_mv AT yasintajohn acomparativestudyonremovalofhazardousanionsfromwaterbyadsorptionareview
AT victoremerydavid acomparativestudyonremovalofhazardousanionsfromwaterbyadsorptionareview
AT danielmmereki acomparativestudyonremovalofhazardousanionsfromwaterbyadsorptionareview
AT yasintajohn comparativestudyonremovalofhazardousanionsfromwaterbyadsorptionareview
AT victoremerydavid comparativestudyonremovalofhazardousanionsfromwaterbyadsorptionareview
AT danielmmereki comparativestudyonremovalofhazardousanionsfromwaterbyadsorptionareview
_version_ 1721338205051027456