Communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern Aragon, 1200-1600
This paper examines the case of sheep raising in Aragon from the thirteenth to the seventeenth century to explore the political dynamics and social criteria that rural communities used to manage their common land, and their role in larger economic and political frameworks. In the line of recent hist...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)
2011-09-01
|
Series: | International Journal of the Commons |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/304 |
id |
doaj-b86e67f1dbde41d59665d1f18f4ce1a2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b86e67f1dbde41d59665d1f18f4ce1a22020-11-25T02:48:52ZengUtrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)International Journal of the Commons1875-02812011-09-015253555610.18352/ijc.304126Communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern Aragon, 1200-1600Esther Pascua Echegaray0Universidad a Distancia de MadridThis paper examines the case of sheep raising in Aragon from the thirteenth to the seventeenth century to explore the political dynamics and social criteria that rural communities used to manage their common land, and their role in larger economic and political frameworks. In the line of recent historiography about the commons, the research connects the strength of rural communities, institutional arrangements governing access to natural resources, and environmental efficiency. The hypothesis is that the “social reproduction” of the community was the aim that defined the collective action of strong and horizontal communities. They preserved their natural resources and defended large swathes of common land from foreigners. However, when these communities acted in a more complex system of transhumance within the framework of poorly articulated kingdoms, they would tend to predate others’ resources and keep others' commons open to their free access. The outcome was the existence of large, but very different, and contested, kinds of commons.https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/304animal husbandryaragoncollective actioncommon landconfraternitiesguildsnatural resourcespasturerural communitiessheeptranshumance |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Esther Pascua Echegaray |
spellingShingle |
Esther Pascua Echegaray Communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern Aragon, 1200-1600 International Journal of the Commons animal husbandry aragon collective action common land confraternities guilds natural resources pasture rural communities sheep transhumance |
author_facet |
Esther Pascua Echegaray |
author_sort |
Esther Pascua Echegaray |
title |
Communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern Aragon, 1200-1600 |
title_short |
Communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern Aragon, 1200-1600 |
title_full |
Communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern Aragon, 1200-1600 |
title_fullStr |
Communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern Aragon, 1200-1600 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern Aragon, 1200-1600 |
title_sort |
communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern aragon, 1200-1600 |
publisher |
Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services) |
series |
International Journal of the Commons |
issn |
1875-0281 |
publishDate |
2011-09-01 |
description |
This paper examines the case of sheep raising in Aragon from the thirteenth to the seventeenth century to explore the political dynamics and social criteria that rural communities used to manage their common land, and their role in larger economic and political frameworks. In the line of recent historiography about the commons, the research connects the strength of rural communities, institutional arrangements governing access to natural resources, and environmental efficiency. The hypothesis is that the “social reproduction” of the community was the aim that defined the collective action of strong and horizontal communities. They preserved their natural resources and defended large swathes of common land from foreigners. However, when these communities acted in a more complex system of transhumance within the framework of poorly articulated kingdoms, they would tend to predate others’ resources and keep others' commons open to their free access. The outcome was the existence of large, but very different, and contested, kinds of commons. |
topic |
animal husbandry aragon collective action common land confraternities guilds natural resources pasture rural communities sheep transhumance |
url |
https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/304 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT estherpascuaechegaray communitiesandsustainabilityinmedievalandearlymodernaragon12001600 |
_version_ |
1724746181347639296 |