Communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern Aragon, 1200-1600

This paper examines the case of sheep raising in Aragon from the thirteenth to the seventeenth century to explore the political dynamics and social criteria that rural communities used to manage their common land, and their role in larger economic and political frameworks. In the line of recent hist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Esther Pascua Echegaray
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services) 2011-09-01
Series:International Journal of the Commons
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/304
id doaj-b86e67f1dbde41d59665d1f18f4ce1a2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b86e67f1dbde41d59665d1f18f4ce1a22020-11-25T02:48:52ZengUtrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)International Journal of the Commons1875-02812011-09-015253555610.18352/ijc.304126Communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern Aragon, 1200-1600Esther Pascua Echegaray0Universidad a Distancia de MadridThis paper examines the case of sheep raising in Aragon from the thirteenth to the seventeenth century to explore the political dynamics and social criteria that rural communities used to manage their common land, and their role in larger economic and political frameworks. In the line of recent historiography about the commons, the research connects the strength of rural communities, institutional arrangements governing access to natural resources, and environmental efficiency. The hypothesis is that the “social reproduction” of the community was the aim that defined the collective action of strong and horizontal communities. They preserved their natural resources and defended large swathes of common land from foreigners. However, when these communities acted in a more complex system of transhumance within the framework of poorly articulated kingdoms, they would tend to predate others’ resources and keep others' commons open to their free access. The outcome was the existence of large, but very different, and contested, kinds of commons.https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/304animal husbandryaragoncollective actioncommon landconfraternitiesguildsnatural resourcespasturerural communitiessheeptranshumance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Esther Pascua Echegaray
spellingShingle Esther Pascua Echegaray
Communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern Aragon, 1200-1600
International Journal of the Commons
animal husbandry
aragon
collective action
common land
confraternities
guilds
natural resources
pasture
rural communities
sheep
transhumance
author_facet Esther Pascua Echegaray
author_sort Esther Pascua Echegaray
title Communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern Aragon, 1200-1600
title_short Communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern Aragon, 1200-1600
title_full Communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern Aragon, 1200-1600
title_fullStr Communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern Aragon, 1200-1600
title_full_unstemmed Communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern Aragon, 1200-1600
title_sort communities and sustainability in medieval and early modern aragon, 1200-1600
publisher Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)
series International Journal of the Commons
issn 1875-0281
publishDate 2011-09-01
description This paper examines the case of sheep raising in Aragon from the thirteenth to the seventeenth century to explore the political dynamics and social criteria that rural communities used to manage their common land, and their role in larger economic and political frameworks. In the line of recent historiography about the commons, the research connects the strength of rural communities, institutional arrangements governing access to natural resources, and environmental efficiency. The hypothesis is that the “social reproduction” of the community was the aim that defined the collective action of strong and horizontal communities. They preserved their natural resources and defended large swathes of common land from foreigners. However, when these communities acted in a more complex system of transhumance within the framework of poorly articulated kingdoms, they would tend to predate others’ resources and keep others' commons open to their free access. The outcome was the existence of large, but very different, and contested, kinds of commons.
topic animal husbandry
aragon
collective action
common land
confraternities
guilds
natural resources
pasture
rural communities
sheep
transhumance
url https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/304
work_keys_str_mv AT estherpascuaechegaray communitiesandsustainabilityinmedievalandearlymodernaragon12001600
_version_ 1724746181347639296