An automated paradigm for Drosophila visual psychophysics.

BACKGROUND: Mutations that cause learning and memory defects in Drosophila melanogaster have been found to also compromise visual responsiveness and attention. A better understanding of attention-like defects in such Drosophila mutants therefore requires a more detailed characterization of visual re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oliver Evans, Angelique C Paulk, Bruno van Swinderen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3126824?pdf=render
id doaj-b868c2fe734947288cad6a9f8a86f8c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b868c2fe734947288cad6a9f8a86f8c72020-11-25T01:15:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0166e2161910.1371/journal.pone.0021619An automated paradigm for Drosophila visual psychophysics.Oliver EvansAngelique C PaulkBruno van SwinderenBACKGROUND: Mutations that cause learning and memory defects in Drosophila melanogaster have been found to also compromise visual responsiveness and attention. A better understanding of attention-like defects in such Drosophila mutants therefore requires a more detailed characterization of visual responsiveness across a range of visual parameters. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We designed an automated behavioral paradigm for efficiently dissecting visual responsiveness in Drosophila. Populations of flies walk through multiplexed serial choice mazes while being exposed to moving visuals displayed on computer monitors, and infra-red fly counters at the end of each maze automatically score the responsiveness of a strain. To test our new design, we performed a detailed comparison between wild-type flies and a learning and memory mutant, dunce(1). We first confirmed that the learning mutant dunce(1) displays increased responsiveness to a black/green moving grating compared to wild type in this new design. We then extended this result to explore responses to a wide range of psychophysical parameters for moving gratings (e.g., luminosity, contrast, spatial frequency, velocity) as well as to a different stimulus, moving dots. Finally, we combined these visuals (gratings versus dots) in competition to investigate how dunce(1) and wild-type flies respond to more complex and conflicting motion effects. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We found that dunce(1) responds more strongly than wild type to high contrast and highly structured motion. This effect was found for simple gratings, dots, and combinations of both stimuli presented in competition.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3126824?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Oliver Evans
Angelique C Paulk
Bruno van Swinderen
spellingShingle Oliver Evans
Angelique C Paulk
Bruno van Swinderen
An automated paradigm for Drosophila visual psychophysics.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Oliver Evans
Angelique C Paulk
Bruno van Swinderen
author_sort Oliver Evans
title An automated paradigm for Drosophila visual psychophysics.
title_short An automated paradigm for Drosophila visual psychophysics.
title_full An automated paradigm for Drosophila visual psychophysics.
title_fullStr An automated paradigm for Drosophila visual psychophysics.
title_full_unstemmed An automated paradigm for Drosophila visual psychophysics.
title_sort automated paradigm for drosophila visual psychophysics.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description BACKGROUND: Mutations that cause learning and memory defects in Drosophila melanogaster have been found to also compromise visual responsiveness and attention. A better understanding of attention-like defects in such Drosophila mutants therefore requires a more detailed characterization of visual responsiveness across a range of visual parameters. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We designed an automated behavioral paradigm for efficiently dissecting visual responsiveness in Drosophila. Populations of flies walk through multiplexed serial choice mazes while being exposed to moving visuals displayed on computer monitors, and infra-red fly counters at the end of each maze automatically score the responsiveness of a strain. To test our new design, we performed a detailed comparison between wild-type flies and a learning and memory mutant, dunce(1). We first confirmed that the learning mutant dunce(1) displays increased responsiveness to a black/green moving grating compared to wild type in this new design. We then extended this result to explore responses to a wide range of psychophysical parameters for moving gratings (e.g., luminosity, contrast, spatial frequency, velocity) as well as to a different stimulus, moving dots. Finally, we combined these visuals (gratings versus dots) in competition to investigate how dunce(1) and wild-type flies respond to more complex and conflicting motion effects. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We found that dunce(1) responds more strongly than wild type to high contrast and highly structured motion. This effect was found for simple gratings, dots, and combinations of both stimuli presented in competition.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3126824?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT oliverevans anautomatedparadigmfordrosophilavisualpsychophysics
AT angeliquecpaulk anautomatedparadigmfordrosophilavisualpsychophysics
AT brunovanswinderen anautomatedparadigmfordrosophilavisualpsychophysics
AT oliverevans automatedparadigmfordrosophilavisualpsychophysics
AT angeliquecpaulk automatedparadigmfordrosophilavisualpsychophysics
AT brunovanswinderen automatedparadigmfordrosophilavisualpsychophysics
_version_ 1725154917294800896