An automated paradigm for Drosophila visual psychophysics.
BACKGROUND: Mutations that cause learning and memory defects in Drosophila melanogaster have been found to also compromise visual responsiveness and attention. A better understanding of attention-like defects in such Drosophila mutants therefore requires a more detailed characterization of visual re...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2011-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3126824?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-b868c2fe734947288cad6a9f8a86f8c7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b868c2fe734947288cad6a9f8a86f8c72020-11-25T01:15:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0166e2161910.1371/journal.pone.0021619An automated paradigm for Drosophila visual psychophysics.Oliver EvansAngelique C PaulkBruno van SwinderenBACKGROUND: Mutations that cause learning and memory defects in Drosophila melanogaster have been found to also compromise visual responsiveness and attention. A better understanding of attention-like defects in such Drosophila mutants therefore requires a more detailed characterization of visual responsiveness across a range of visual parameters. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We designed an automated behavioral paradigm for efficiently dissecting visual responsiveness in Drosophila. Populations of flies walk through multiplexed serial choice mazes while being exposed to moving visuals displayed on computer monitors, and infra-red fly counters at the end of each maze automatically score the responsiveness of a strain. To test our new design, we performed a detailed comparison between wild-type flies and a learning and memory mutant, dunce(1). We first confirmed that the learning mutant dunce(1) displays increased responsiveness to a black/green moving grating compared to wild type in this new design. We then extended this result to explore responses to a wide range of psychophysical parameters for moving gratings (e.g., luminosity, contrast, spatial frequency, velocity) as well as to a different stimulus, moving dots. Finally, we combined these visuals (gratings versus dots) in competition to investigate how dunce(1) and wild-type flies respond to more complex and conflicting motion effects. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We found that dunce(1) responds more strongly than wild type to high contrast and highly structured motion. This effect was found for simple gratings, dots, and combinations of both stimuli presented in competition.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3126824?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Oliver Evans Angelique C Paulk Bruno van Swinderen |
spellingShingle |
Oliver Evans Angelique C Paulk Bruno van Swinderen An automated paradigm for Drosophila visual psychophysics. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Oliver Evans Angelique C Paulk Bruno van Swinderen |
author_sort |
Oliver Evans |
title |
An automated paradigm for Drosophila visual psychophysics. |
title_short |
An automated paradigm for Drosophila visual psychophysics. |
title_full |
An automated paradigm for Drosophila visual psychophysics. |
title_fullStr |
An automated paradigm for Drosophila visual psychophysics. |
title_full_unstemmed |
An automated paradigm for Drosophila visual psychophysics. |
title_sort |
automated paradigm for drosophila visual psychophysics. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2011-01-01 |
description |
BACKGROUND: Mutations that cause learning and memory defects in Drosophila melanogaster have been found to also compromise visual responsiveness and attention. A better understanding of attention-like defects in such Drosophila mutants therefore requires a more detailed characterization of visual responsiveness across a range of visual parameters. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We designed an automated behavioral paradigm for efficiently dissecting visual responsiveness in Drosophila. Populations of flies walk through multiplexed serial choice mazes while being exposed to moving visuals displayed on computer monitors, and infra-red fly counters at the end of each maze automatically score the responsiveness of a strain. To test our new design, we performed a detailed comparison between wild-type flies and a learning and memory mutant, dunce(1). We first confirmed that the learning mutant dunce(1) displays increased responsiveness to a black/green moving grating compared to wild type in this new design. We then extended this result to explore responses to a wide range of psychophysical parameters for moving gratings (e.g., luminosity, contrast, spatial frequency, velocity) as well as to a different stimulus, moving dots. Finally, we combined these visuals (gratings versus dots) in competition to investigate how dunce(1) and wild-type flies respond to more complex and conflicting motion effects. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We found that dunce(1) responds more strongly than wild type to high contrast and highly structured motion. This effect was found for simple gratings, dots, and combinations of both stimuli presented in competition. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3126824?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT oliverevans anautomatedparadigmfordrosophilavisualpsychophysics AT angeliquecpaulk anautomatedparadigmfordrosophilavisualpsychophysics AT brunovanswinderen anautomatedparadigmfordrosophilavisualpsychophysics AT oliverevans automatedparadigmfordrosophilavisualpsychophysics AT angeliquecpaulk automatedparadigmfordrosophilavisualpsychophysics AT brunovanswinderen automatedparadigmfordrosophilavisualpsychophysics |
_version_ |
1725154917294800896 |