Hormonal, functional and genetic biomarkers in controlled ovarian stimulation: tools for matching patients and protocols

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Variability in the subfertile patient population excludes the possibility of a single approach to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) covering all the requirements of a patient. Modern technology has led to the development of new drugs, treatment options and qua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alviggi Carlo, Humaidan Peter, Ezcurra Diego
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-02-01
Series:Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.rbej.com/content/10/1/9
id doaj-b82bd017eb2d423ebf4cd3ddd13c5f7e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b82bd017eb2d423ebf4cd3ddd13c5f7e2020-11-24T21:53:01ZengBMCReproductive Biology and Endocrinology1477-78272012-02-01101910.1186/1477-7827-10-9Hormonal, functional and genetic biomarkers in controlled ovarian stimulation: tools for matching patients and protocolsAlviggi CarloHumaidan PeterEzcurra Diego<p>Abstract</p> <p>Variability in the subfertile patient population excludes the possibility of a single approach to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) covering all the requirements of a patient. Modern technology has led to the development of new drugs, treatment options and quantitative methods that can identify single patient characteristics. These could potentially be used to match patients with the right treatment options to optimise efficacy, safety and tolerability during COS. Currently, age and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level remain the most commonly used single patient characteristics in clinical practice. These variables only provide a basic prognosis for success and indications for standard COS treatment based on gross patient categorisation. In contrast, the anti-Müllerian hormone level appears to be an accurate predictor of ovarian reserve and response to COS, and could be used successfully to guide COS. The antral follicle count is a functional biomarker that could be useful in determining the dose of FSH necessary during stimulation and the success of treatment. Finally, in the future, genetic screening may allow an individual patient's response to stimulation during COS to be predicted based on genotype. Unfortunately, despite the predictive power of these measures, no single biomarker can stand alone as a guide to determine the best treatment option. In the future, hormonal, functional and genetic biomarkers will be used together to personalise COS.</p> http://www.rbej.com/content/10/1/9controlled ovarian stimulationbiomarkerspersonalisedgenetic screening
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alviggi Carlo
Humaidan Peter
Ezcurra Diego
spellingShingle Alviggi Carlo
Humaidan Peter
Ezcurra Diego
Hormonal, functional and genetic biomarkers in controlled ovarian stimulation: tools for matching patients and protocols
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
controlled ovarian stimulation
biomarkers
personalised
genetic screening
author_facet Alviggi Carlo
Humaidan Peter
Ezcurra Diego
author_sort Alviggi Carlo
title Hormonal, functional and genetic biomarkers in controlled ovarian stimulation: tools for matching patients and protocols
title_short Hormonal, functional and genetic biomarkers in controlled ovarian stimulation: tools for matching patients and protocols
title_full Hormonal, functional and genetic biomarkers in controlled ovarian stimulation: tools for matching patients and protocols
title_fullStr Hormonal, functional and genetic biomarkers in controlled ovarian stimulation: tools for matching patients and protocols
title_full_unstemmed Hormonal, functional and genetic biomarkers in controlled ovarian stimulation: tools for matching patients and protocols
title_sort hormonal, functional and genetic biomarkers in controlled ovarian stimulation: tools for matching patients and protocols
publisher BMC
series Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
issn 1477-7827
publishDate 2012-02-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Variability in the subfertile patient population excludes the possibility of a single approach to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) covering all the requirements of a patient. Modern technology has led to the development of new drugs, treatment options and quantitative methods that can identify single patient characteristics. These could potentially be used to match patients with the right treatment options to optimise efficacy, safety and tolerability during COS. Currently, age and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level remain the most commonly used single patient characteristics in clinical practice. These variables only provide a basic prognosis for success and indications for standard COS treatment based on gross patient categorisation. In contrast, the anti-Müllerian hormone level appears to be an accurate predictor of ovarian reserve and response to COS, and could be used successfully to guide COS. The antral follicle count is a functional biomarker that could be useful in determining the dose of FSH necessary during stimulation and the success of treatment. Finally, in the future, genetic screening may allow an individual patient's response to stimulation during COS to be predicted based on genotype. Unfortunately, despite the predictive power of these measures, no single biomarker can stand alone as a guide to determine the best treatment option. In the future, hormonal, functional and genetic biomarkers will be used together to personalise COS.</p>
topic controlled ovarian stimulation
biomarkers
personalised
genetic screening
url http://www.rbej.com/content/10/1/9
work_keys_str_mv AT alviggicarlo hormonalfunctionalandgeneticbiomarkersincontrolledovarianstimulationtoolsformatchingpatientsandprotocols
AT humaidanpeter hormonalfunctionalandgeneticbiomarkersincontrolledovarianstimulationtoolsformatchingpatientsandprotocols
AT ezcurradiego hormonalfunctionalandgeneticbiomarkersincontrolledovarianstimulationtoolsformatchingpatientsandprotocols
_version_ 1725873436184543232