Trade-Off Theory Versus Pecking Order Theory: Ghanaian Evidence

The objective of this study was to examine the theoretical predictions of the pecking order theory and the trade-off theory to establish which of the two competing theories better explains the financing decisions of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). The study examined 187 SMEs in Ghana using the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James Agyei, Shaorong Sun, Eugene Abrokwah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-07-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020940987
id doaj-b81e154bcfbb4aa7b2b7a90a69fdcb8c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b81e154bcfbb4aa7b2b7a90a69fdcb8c2020-11-25T03:46:29ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402020-07-011010.1177/2158244020940987Trade-Off Theory Versus Pecking Order Theory: Ghanaian EvidenceJames Agyei0Shaorong Sun1Eugene Abrokwah2University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, ChinaUniversity of Shanghai for Science and Technology, ChinaUniversity of Shanghai for Science and Technology, ChinaThe objective of this study was to examine the theoretical predictions of the pecking order theory and the trade-off theory to establish which of the two competing theories better explains the financing decisions of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). The study examined 187 SMEs in Ghana using the panel data methodology. The results reveal that the explanatory power of both theories apply and are pertinent to Ghanaian SMEs. The results also show that profitability, age, liquidity, growth, size, and tangibility of assets all have a significant impact on SMEs’ capital structure. In addition, the findings show that risk plays no vital role in how SMEs choose their capital structure. Broadly, the results provide evidence to back the pecking order theory, indicating that Ghanaian SMEs’ funding decisions exhibit the theoretical predictions of the pecking order theory.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020940987
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James Agyei
Shaorong Sun
Eugene Abrokwah
spellingShingle James Agyei
Shaorong Sun
Eugene Abrokwah
Trade-Off Theory Versus Pecking Order Theory: Ghanaian Evidence
SAGE Open
author_facet James Agyei
Shaorong Sun
Eugene Abrokwah
author_sort James Agyei
title Trade-Off Theory Versus Pecking Order Theory: Ghanaian Evidence
title_short Trade-Off Theory Versus Pecking Order Theory: Ghanaian Evidence
title_full Trade-Off Theory Versus Pecking Order Theory: Ghanaian Evidence
title_fullStr Trade-Off Theory Versus Pecking Order Theory: Ghanaian Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Trade-Off Theory Versus Pecking Order Theory: Ghanaian Evidence
title_sort trade-off theory versus pecking order theory: ghanaian evidence
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2020-07-01
description The objective of this study was to examine the theoretical predictions of the pecking order theory and the trade-off theory to establish which of the two competing theories better explains the financing decisions of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). The study examined 187 SMEs in Ghana using the panel data methodology. The results reveal that the explanatory power of both theories apply and are pertinent to Ghanaian SMEs. The results also show that profitability, age, liquidity, growth, size, and tangibility of assets all have a significant impact on SMEs’ capital structure. In addition, the findings show that risk plays no vital role in how SMEs choose their capital structure. Broadly, the results provide evidence to back the pecking order theory, indicating that Ghanaian SMEs’ funding decisions exhibit the theoretical predictions of the pecking order theory.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020940987
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesagyei tradeofftheoryversuspeckingordertheoryghanaianevidence
AT shaorongsun tradeofftheoryversuspeckingordertheoryghanaianevidence
AT eugeneabrokwah tradeofftheoryversuspeckingordertheoryghanaianevidence
_version_ 1724506225637326848