Scientometrics Analysis for Research Performance Evaluation: Methodological Issues at Meso and Micro Levels
Newly introduced scientometric indices have gained much popularity and have been widely discussed. The application of such indices and their validity for Research Performance Evaluation (RPE) focuses on various contexts and aggregate levels. Several methodological concerns have been raised regarding...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of the Punjab, Department of Information Management
2016-09-01
|
Series: | Pakistan Journal of Information Management & Libraries |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.pu.edu.pk/journals/index.php/pjiml/article/view/899 |
id |
doaj-b804d0a2c5164b778fd332328b965bfe |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b804d0a2c5164b778fd332328b965bfe2021-01-08T18:34:18ZengUniversity of the Punjab, Department of Information ManagementPakistan Journal of Information Management & Libraries2409-74622016-09-01170120125456Scientometrics Analysis for Research Performance Evaluation: Methodological Issues at Meso and Micro LevelsMuzammil Tahira0Aryati Bakri1Kiran Kaur2University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, MalaysiaUniversity of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Newly introduced scientometric indices have gained much popularity and have been widely discussed. The application of such indices and their validity for Research Performance Evaluation (RPE) focuses on various contexts and aggregate levels. Several methodological concerns have been raised regarding the application of these indices for RPE purpose. This study aims at describing the methodological issues faced and lessons learned from the investigations carried out on engineering research data in Malaysia, using the scientometric approach at meso and micro levels. This scientometric case study employed a set of newly introduced RPE indices along with traditional metrics. The unit of analysis was Malaysian engineering research. At meso level, twelve Malaysian universities were selected. While, at the micro level, a hundred most productive Malaysian related researchers were chosen. The data were retrieved from Web of Science (WoS) for the duration of ten years (2001-2010) and limited to nine WoS engineering categories only. This study enlightens the issues and suggests the possible measures that should be taken into account while conducting the empirical studies by applying scientometric approach to RPE.<br />http://journals.pu.edu.pk/journals/index.php/pjiml/article/view/899research performance evaluationpublicationscitationsengineering researchmalaysia |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Muzammil Tahira Aryati Bakri Kiran Kaur |
spellingShingle |
Muzammil Tahira Aryati Bakri Kiran Kaur Scientometrics Analysis for Research Performance Evaluation: Methodological Issues at Meso and Micro Levels Pakistan Journal of Information Management & Libraries research performance evaluation publications citations engineering research malaysia |
author_facet |
Muzammil Tahira Aryati Bakri Kiran Kaur |
author_sort |
Muzammil Tahira |
title |
Scientometrics Analysis for Research Performance Evaluation: Methodological Issues at Meso and Micro Levels |
title_short |
Scientometrics Analysis for Research Performance Evaluation: Methodological Issues at Meso and Micro Levels |
title_full |
Scientometrics Analysis for Research Performance Evaluation: Methodological Issues at Meso and Micro Levels |
title_fullStr |
Scientometrics Analysis for Research Performance Evaluation: Methodological Issues at Meso and Micro Levels |
title_full_unstemmed |
Scientometrics Analysis for Research Performance Evaluation: Methodological Issues at Meso and Micro Levels |
title_sort |
scientometrics analysis for research performance evaluation: methodological issues at meso and micro levels |
publisher |
University of the Punjab, Department of Information Management |
series |
Pakistan Journal of Information Management & Libraries |
issn |
2409-7462 |
publishDate |
2016-09-01 |
description |
Newly introduced scientometric indices have gained much popularity and have been widely discussed. The application of such indices and their validity for Research Performance Evaluation (RPE) focuses on various contexts and aggregate levels. Several methodological concerns have been raised regarding the application of these indices for RPE purpose. This study aims at describing the methodological issues faced and lessons learned from the investigations carried out on engineering research data in Malaysia, using the scientometric approach at meso and micro levels. This scientometric case study employed a set of newly introduced RPE indices along with traditional metrics. The unit of analysis was Malaysian engineering research. At meso level, twelve Malaysian universities were selected. While, at the micro level, a hundred most productive Malaysian related researchers were chosen. The data were retrieved from Web of Science (WoS) for the duration of ten years (2001-2010) and limited to nine WoS engineering categories only. This study enlightens the issues and suggests the possible measures that should be taken into account while conducting the empirical studies by applying scientometric approach to RPE.<br /> |
topic |
research performance evaluation publications citations engineering research malaysia |
url |
http://journals.pu.edu.pk/journals/index.php/pjiml/article/view/899 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT muzammiltahira scientometricsanalysisforresearchperformanceevaluationmethodologicalissuesatmesoandmicrolevels AT aryatibakri scientometricsanalysisforresearchperformanceevaluationmethodologicalissuesatmesoandmicrolevels AT kirankaur scientometricsanalysisforresearchperformanceevaluationmethodologicalissuesatmesoandmicrolevels |
_version_ |
1724344460821659648 |