Scientometrics Analysis for Research Performance Evaluation: Methodological Issues at Meso and Micro Levels

Newly introduced scientometric indices have gained much popularity and have been widely discussed. The application of such indices and their validity for Research Performance Evaluation (RPE) focuses on various contexts and aggregate levels. Several methodological concerns have been raised regarding...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muzammil Tahira, Aryati Bakri, Kiran Kaur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Punjab, Department of Information Management 2016-09-01
Series:Pakistan Journal of Information Management & Libraries
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.pu.edu.pk/journals/index.php/pjiml/article/view/899
id doaj-b804d0a2c5164b778fd332328b965bfe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b804d0a2c5164b778fd332328b965bfe2021-01-08T18:34:18ZengUniversity of the Punjab, Department of Information ManagementPakistan Journal of Information Management & Libraries2409-74622016-09-01170120125456Scientometrics Analysis for Research Performance Evaluation: Methodological Issues at Meso and Micro LevelsMuzammil Tahira0Aryati Bakri1Kiran Kaur2University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, MalaysiaUniversity of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Newly introduced scientometric indices have gained much popularity and have been widely discussed. The application of such indices and their validity for Research Performance Evaluation (RPE) focuses on various contexts and aggregate levels. Several methodological concerns have been raised regarding the application of these indices for RPE purpose. This study aims at describing the methodological issues faced and lessons learned from the investigations carried out on engineering research data in Malaysia, using the scientometric approach at meso and micro levels. This scientometric case study employed a set of newly introduced RPE indices along with traditional metrics. The unit of analysis was Malaysian engineering research. At meso level, twelve Malaysian universities were selected. While, at the micro level, a hundred most productive Malaysian related researchers were chosen. The data were retrieved from Web of Science (WoS) for the duration of ten years (2001-2010) and limited to nine WoS engineering categories only. This study enlightens the issues and suggests the possible measures that should be taken into account while conducting the empirical studies by applying scientometric approach to RPE.<br />http://journals.pu.edu.pk/journals/index.php/pjiml/article/view/899research performance evaluationpublicationscitationsengineering researchmalaysia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Muzammil Tahira
Aryati Bakri
Kiran Kaur
spellingShingle Muzammil Tahira
Aryati Bakri
Kiran Kaur
Scientometrics Analysis for Research Performance Evaluation: Methodological Issues at Meso and Micro Levels
Pakistan Journal of Information Management & Libraries
research performance evaluation
publications
citations
engineering research
malaysia
author_facet Muzammil Tahira
Aryati Bakri
Kiran Kaur
author_sort Muzammil Tahira
title Scientometrics Analysis for Research Performance Evaluation: Methodological Issues at Meso and Micro Levels
title_short Scientometrics Analysis for Research Performance Evaluation: Methodological Issues at Meso and Micro Levels
title_full Scientometrics Analysis for Research Performance Evaluation: Methodological Issues at Meso and Micro Levels
title_fullStr Scientometrics Analysis for Research Performance Evaluation: Methodological Issues at Meso and Micro Levels
title_full_unstemmed Scientometrics Analysis for Research Performance Evaluation: Methodological Issues at Meso and Micro Levels
title_sort scientometrics analysis for research performance evaluation: methodological issues at meso and micro levels
publisher University of the Punjab, Department of Information Management
series Pakistan Journal of Information Management & Libraries
issn 2409-7462
publishDate 2016-09-01
description Newly introduced scientometric indices have gained much popularity and have been widely discussed. The application of such indices and their validity for Research Performance Evaluation (RPE) focuses on various contexts and aggregate levels. Several methodological concerns have been raised regarding the application of these indices for RPE purpose. This study aims at describing the methodological issues faced and lessons learned from the investigations carried out on engineering research data in Malaysia, using the scientometric approach at meso and micro levels. This scientometric case study employed a set of newly introduced RPE indices along with traditional metrics. The unit of analysis was Malaysian engineering research. At meso level, twelve Malaysian universities were selected. While, at the micro level, a hundred most productive Malaysian related researchers were chosen. The data were retrieved from Web of Science (WoS) for the duration of ten years (2001-2010) and limited to nine WoS engineering categories only. This study enlightens the issues and suggests the possible measures that should be taken into account while conducting the empirical studies by applying scientometric approach to RPE.<br />
topic research performance evaluation
publications
citations
engineering research
malaysia
url http://journals.pu.edu.pk/journals/index.php/pjiml/article/view/899
work_keys_str_mv AT muzammiltahira scientometricsanalysisforresearchperformanceevaluationmethodologicalissuesatmesoandmicrolevels
AT aryatibakri scientometricsanalysisforresearchperformanceevaluationmethodologicalissuesatmesoandmicrolevels
AT kirankaur scientometricsanalysisforresearchperformanceevaluationmethodologicalissuesatmesoandmicrolevels
_version_ 1724344460821659648