Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices
Commercial forests require early cleaning to ensure the unhindered and uniform growth of crop trees. In order to be cost effective, non-crop vegetation should be uprooted to prevent their recovery. Performing this work manually is a labour-intensive task but it can be done mechanically. W...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Finnish Society of Forest Science
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Silva Fennica |
Online Access: | https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1514 |
id |
doaj-b7f8d9a4ebb74f959d2098e9bf131bb0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b7f8d9a4ebb74f959d2098e9bf131bb02020-11-25T03:49:28ZengFinnish Society of Forest ScienceSilva Fennica2242-40752016-01-0150310.14214/sf.1514Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devicesHallongren, HeidiKankaanhuhta, VilleKukkonen, Mikael Commercial forests require early cleaning to ensure the unhindered and uniform growth of crop trees. In order to be cost effective, non-crop vegetation should be uprooted to prevent their recovery. Performing this work manually is a labour-intensive task but it can be done mechanically. We evaluated the efficiency of two uprooting devices in direct seeded Scots pine (L.) stands ca. 1 m tall. Productivity and quality of the uprooting work was investigated across eight stands and ca. 160 sample plots in northern Karelia, eastern Finland. Time consumption of the uprooters was analyzed through a linear regression model and the work quality through a multilevel multivariate model in terms of the number of individual Scots pine seedlings, processing units (i.e., a bunch of seedlings to be harvested in the future) and broadleaves. The productivity of the narrower modified device was significantly better in terms of time consumption than the wider original device. Work quality did not differ significantly between devices when stand characteristics, regeneration success and pre-existing damage were taken into account. Results indicate that mechanical uprooting devices may be further developed to a cost-effective alternative to motor-manual techniques for the early cleaning of direct seeded commercial Scots pine stands.Pinus sylvestris https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1514 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hallongren, Heidi Kankaanhuhta, Ville Kukkonen, Mikael |
spellingShingle |
Hallongren, Heidi Kankaanhuhta, Ville Kukkonen, Mikael Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices Silva Fennica |
author_facet |
Hallongren, Heidi Kankaanhuhta, Ville Kukkonen, Mikael |
author_sort |
Hallongren, Heidi |
title |
Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices |
title_short |
Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices |
title_full |
Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices |
title_fullStr |
Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices |
title_sort |
cleaning scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices |
publisher |
Finnish Society of Forest Science |
series |
Silva Fennica |
issn |
2242-4075 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Commercial forests require early cleaning to ensure the unhindered and uniform growth of crop trees. In order to be cost effective, non-crop vegetation should be uprooted to prevent their recovery. Performing this work manually is a labour-intensive task but it can be done mechanically. We evaluated the efficiency of two uprooting devices in direct seeded Scots pine (L.) stands ca. 1 m tall. Productivity and quality of the uprooting work was investigated across eight stands and ca. 160 sample plots in northern Karelia, eastern Finland. Time consumption of the uprooters was analyzed through a linear regression model and the work quality through a multilevel multivariate model in terms of the number of individual Scots pine seedlings, processing units (i.e., a bunch of seedlings to be harvested in the future) and broadleaves. The productivity of the narrower modified device was significantly better in terms of time consumption than the wider original device. Work quality did not differ significantly between devices when stand characteristics, regeneration success and pre-existing damage were taken into account. Results indicate that mechanical uprooting devices may be further developed to a cost-effective alternative to motor-manual techniques for the early cleaning of direct seeded commercial Scots pine stands.Pinus sylvestris |
url |
https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1514 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hallongrenheidi cleaningscotspineseedlingstandswithmechanicaluprootersaworkqualitycomparisonoftworelateddevices AT kankaanhuhtaville cleaningscotspineseedlingstandswithmechanicaluprootersaworkqualitycomparisonoftworelateddevices AT kukkonenmikael cleaningscotspineseedlingstandswithmechanicaluprootersaworkqualitycomparisonoftworelateddevices |
_version_ |
1724495309357187072 |