Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices

Commercial forests require early cleaning to ensure the unhindered and uniform growth of crop trees. In order to be cost effective, non-crop vegetation should be uprooted to prevent their recovery. Performing this work manually is a labour-intensive task but it can be done mechanically. W...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hallongren, Heidi, Kankaanhuhta, Ville, Kukkonen, Mikael
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Society of Forest Science 2016-01-01
Series:Silva Fennica
Online Access:https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1514
id doaj-b7f8d9a4ebb74f959d2098e9bf131bb0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b7f8d9a4ebb74f959d2098e9bf131bb02020-11-25T03:49:28ZengFinnish Society of Forest ScienceSilva Fennica2242-40752016-01-0150310.14214/sf.1514Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devicesHallongren, HeidiKankaanhuhta, VilleKukkonen, Mikael Commercial forests require early cleaning to ensure the unhindered and uniform growth of crop trees. In order to be cost effective, non-crop vegetation should be uprooted to prevent their recovery. Performing this work manually is a labour-intensive task but it can be done mechanically. We evaluated the efficiency of two uprooting devices in direct seeded Scots pine (L.) stands ca. 1 m tall. Productivity and quality of the uprooting work was investigated across eight stands and ca. 160 sample plots in northern Karelia, eastern Finland. Time consumption of the uprooters was analyzed through a linear regression model and the work quality through a multilevel multivariate model in terms of the number of individual Scots pine seedlings, processing units (i.e., a bunch of seedlings to be harvested in the future) and broadleaves. The productivity of the narrower modified device was significantly better in terms of time consumption than the wider original device. Work quality did not differ significantly between devices when stand characteristics, regeneration success and pre-existing damage were taken into account. Results indicate that mechanical uprooting devices may be further developed to a cost-effective alternative to motor-manual techniques for the early cleaning of direct seeded commercial Scots pine stands.Pinus sylvestris https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1514
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hallongren, Heidi
Kankaanhuhta, Ville
Kukkonen, Mikael
spellingShingle Hallongren, Heidi
Kankaanhuhta, Ville
Kukkonen, Mikael
Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices
Silva Fennica
author_facet Hallongren, Heidi
Kankaanhuhta, Ville
Kukkonen, Mikael
author_sort Hallongren, Heidi
title Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices
title_short Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices
title_full Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices
title_fullStr Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices
title_full_unstemmed Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices
title_sort cleaning scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices
publisher Finnish Society of Forest Science
series Silva Fennica
issn 2242-4075
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Commercial forests require early cleaning to ensure the unhindered and uniform growth of crop trees. In order to be cost effective, non-crop vegetation should be uprooted to prevent their recovery. Performing this work manually is a labour-intensive task but it can be done mechanically. We evaluated the efficiency of two uprooting devices in direct seeded Scots pine (L.) stands ca. 1 m tall. Productivity and quality of the uprooting work was investigated across eight stands and ca. 160 sample plots in northern Karelia, eastern Finland. Time consumption of the uprooters was analyzed through a linear regression model and the work quality through a multilevel multivariate model in terms of the number of individual Scots pine seedlings, processing units (i.e., a bunch of seedlings to be harvested in the future) and broadleaves. The productivity of the narrower modified device was significantly better in terms of time consumption than the wider original device. Work quality did not differ significantly between devices when stand characteristics, regeneration success and pre-existing damage were taken into account. Results indicate that mechanical uprooting devices may be further developed to a cost-effective alternative to motor-manual techniques for the early cleaning of direct seeded commercial Scots pine stands.Pinus sylvestris
url https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1514
work_keys_str_mv AT hallongrenheidi cleaningscotspineseedlingstandswithmechanicaluprootersaworkqualitycomparisonoftworelateddevices
AT kankaanhuhtaville cleaningscotspineseedlingstandswithmechanicaluprootersaworkqualitycomparisonoftworelateddevices
AT kukkonenmikael cleaningscotspineseedlingstandswithmechanicaluprootersaworkqualitycomparisonoftworelateddevices
_version_ 1724495309357187072