The Anatomy of the Revenger: Violence and Dissection on the Early Modern English Stage
The persistent employment of excessive violence on the early modern English stage was studied by Renaissance scholarship for centuries in diverse but rather formal or historicist ways, and this critical focus received no new impetus until the corporal turn in critical theory after the 1980s. Before...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Bergen Open Access Publishing
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Early Modern Culture Online |
Online Access: | https://boap.uib.no/index.php/emco/article/view/1278 |
id |
doaj-b7edd1f607b6477da06190b828e57420 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b7edd1f607b6477da06190b828e574202020-11-24T20:51:58ZdeuBergen Open Access PublishingEarly Modern Culture Online1892-08882018-02-012110.15845/emco.v2i1.1278723The Anatomy of the Revenger: Violence and Dissection on the Early Modern English StageAttila Kiss0University of Szeged, Department of EnglishThe persistent employment of excessive violence on the early modern English stage was studied by Renaissance scholarship for centuries in diverse but rather formal or historicist ways, and this critical focus received no new impetus until the corporal turn in critical theory after the 1980s. Before the poststructuralist, or, more precisely, the postsemiotic and corposemiotic investigations, critics tended to categorize bodily transgression as part of the general process of deterioration that lead to the decadence and all-enveloping perversity of the Stuart and Caroline stage, or they merely catalogued the metamorphoses of iconographic and emblematic elements of the memento mori, the ars moriendi, the contemptus mundi, the danse macabre or the exemplum horrendum traditions through the imagery of violence, mutilation and corporeal disintegration. The reception history of Shakespeare’s first tragedy exemplifies the general hostility towards extreme violence, an attitude which was established by the technologies of canon formation in the eighteenth and nineteenth century.https://boap.uib.no/index.php/emco/article/view/1278 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Attila Kiss |
spellingShingle |
Attila Kiss The Anatomy of the Revenger: Violence and Dissection on the Early Modern English Stage Early Modern Culture Online |
author_facet |
Attila Kiss |
author_sort |
Attila Kiss |
title |
The Anatomy of the Revenger: Violence and Dissection on the Early Modern English Stage |
title_short |
The Anatomy of the Revenger: Violence and Dissection on the Early Modern English Stage |
title_full |
The Anatomy of the Revenger: Violence and Dissection on the Early Modern English Stage |
title_fullStr |
The Anatomy of the Revenger: Violence and Dissection on the Early Modern English Stage |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Anatomy of the Revenger: Violence and Dissection on the Early Modern English Stage |
title_sort |
anatomy of the revenger: violence and dissection on the early modern english stage |
publisher |
Bergen Open Access Publishing |
series |
Early Modern Culture Online |
issn |
1892-0888 |
publishDate |
2018-02-01 |
description |
The persistent employment of excessive violence on the early modern English stage was studied by Renaissance scholarship for centuries in diverse but rather formal or historicist ways, and this critical focus received no new impetus until the corporal turn in critical theory after the 1980s. Before the poststructuralist, or, more precisely, the postsemiotic and corposemiotic investigations, critics tended to categorize bodily transgression as part of the general process of deterioration that lead to the decadence and all-enveloping perversity of the Stuart and Caroline stage, or they merely catalogued the metamorphoses of iconographic and emblematic elements of the memento mori, the ars moriendi, the contemptus mundi, the danse macabre or the exemplum horrendum traditions through the imagery of violence, mutilation and corporeal disintegration. The reception history of Shakespeare’s first tragedy exemplifies the general hostility towards extreme violence, an attitude which was established by the technologies of canon formation in the eighteenth and nineteenth century. |
url |
https://boap.uib.no/index.php/emco/article/view/1278 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT attilakiss theanatomyoftherevengerviolenceanddissectionontheearlymodernenglishstage AT attilakiss anatomyoftherevengerviolenceanddissectionontheearlymodernenglishstage |
_version_ |
1716800744517009408 |