Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary?
To displace fossil fuels and achieve the global greenhouse-gas emissions reductions required to meet the Paris Agreement on climate change, the prevalent argument is that a mix of different low-carbon energy sources will need to be deployed. Here we seek to challenge that viewpoint. We argue that a...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/302 |
id |
doaj-b7e68612430e4c088e302f82fa585451 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b7e68612430e4c088e302f82fa5854512020-11-24T22:32:39ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-01-0110230210.3390/su10020302su10020302Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary?Barry W. Brook0Tom Blees1Tom M. L. Wigley2Sanghyun Hong3Faculty of Science, Engineering & Technology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart 7001, AustraliaScience Council for Global Initiatives, North Fort Myers, FL 33903, USANational Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USAFaculty of Science, Engineering & Technology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart 7001, AustraliaTo displace fossil fuels and achieve the global greenhouse-gas emissions reductions required to meet the Paris Agreement on climate change, the prevalent argument is that a mix of different low-carbon energy sources will need to be deployed. Here we seek to challenge that viewpoint. We argue that a completely decarbonized, energy-rich and sustainable future could be achieved with a dominant deployment of next-generation nuclear fission and associated technologies for synthesizing liquid fuels and recycling waste. By contrast, non-dispatchable energy sources like wind and solar energy are arguably superfluous, other than for niche applications, and run the risk of diverting resources away from viable and holistic solutions. For instance, the pairing of variable renewables with natural-gas backup fails to address many of the entrenched problems we seek to solve. Our conclusion is that, given the urgent time frame and massive extent of the energy-replacement challenge, half-measures that distract from or stymie effective policy and infrastructure investment should be avoided.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/302nuclear fissionnatural gasrenewable energyclimate changeenergy mix |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Barry W. Brook Tom Blees Tom M. L. Wigley Sanghyun Hong |
spellingShingle |
Barry W. Brook Tom Blees Tom M. L. Wigley Sanghyun Hong Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary? Sustainability nuclear fission natural gas renewable energy climate change energy mix |
author_facet |
Barry W. Brook Tom Blees Tom M. L. Wigley Sanghyun Hong |
author_sort |
Barry W. Brook |
title |
Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary? |
title_short |
Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary? |
title_full |
Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary? |
title_fullStr |
Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary? |
title_sort |
silver buckshot or bullet: is a future “energy mix” necessary? |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
To displace fossil fuels and achieve the global greenhouse-gas emissions reductions required to meet the Paris Agreement on climate change, the prevalent argument is that a mix of different low-carbon energy sources will need to be deployed. Here we seek to challenge that viewpoint. We argue that a completely decarbonized, energy-rich and sustainable future could be achieved with a dominant deployment of next-generation nuclear fission and associated technologies for synthesizing liquid fuels and recycling waste. By contrast, non-dispatchable energy sources like wind and solar energy are arguably superfluous, other than for niche applications, and run the risk of diverting resources away from viable and holistic solutions. For instance, the pairing of variable renewables with natural-gas backup fails to address many of the entrenched problems we seek to solve. Our conclusion is that, given the urgent time frame and massive extent of the energy-replacement challenge, half-measures that distract from or stymie effective policy and infrastructure investment should be avoided. |
topic |
nuclear fission natural gas renewable energy climate change energy mix |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/302 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT barrywbrook silverbuckshotorbulletisafutureenergymixnecessary AT tomblees silverbuckshotorbulletisafutureenergymixnecessary AT tommlwigley silverbuckshotorbulletisafutureenergymixnecessary AT sanghyunhong silverbuckshotorbulletisafutureenergymixnecessary |
_version_ |
1725732944348184576 |