Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary?

To displace fossil fuels and achieve the global greenhouse-gas emissions reductions required to meet the Paris Agreement on climate change, the prevalent argument is that a mix of different low-carbon energy sources will need to be deployed. Here we seek to challenge that viewpoint. We argue that a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barry W. Brook, Tom Blees, Tom M. L. Wigley, Sanghyun Hong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-01-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/302
id doaj-b7e68612430e4c088e302f82fa585451
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b7e68612430e4c088e302f82fa5854512020-11-24T22:32:39ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-01-0110230210.3390/su10020302su10020302Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary?Barry W. Brook0Tom Blees1Tom M. L. Wigley2Sanghyun Hong3Faculty of Science, Engineering & Technology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart 7001, AustraliaScience Council for Global Initiatives, North Fort Myers, FL 33903, USANational Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USAFaculty of Science, Engineering & Technology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart 7001, AustraliaTo displace fossil fuels and achieve the global greenhouse-gas emissions reductions required to meet the Paris Agreement on climate change, the prevalent argument is that a mix of different low-carbon energy sources will need to be deployed. Here we seek to challenge that viewpoint. We argue that a completely decarbonized, energy-rich and sustainable future could be achieved with a dominant deployment of next-generation nuclear fission and associated technologies for synthesizing liquid fuels and recycling waste. By contrast, non-dispatchable energy sources like wind and solar energy are arguably superfluous, other than for niche applications, and run the risk of diverting resources away from viable and holistic solutions. For instance, the pairing of variable renewables with natural-gas backup fails to address many of the entrenched problems we seek to solve. Our conclusion is that, given the urgent time frame and massive extent of the energy-replacement challenge, half-measures that distract from or stymie effective policy and infrastructure investment should be avoided.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/302nuclear fissionnatural gasrenewable energyclimate changeenergy mix
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Barry W. Brook
Tom Blees
Tom M. L. Wigley
Sanghyun Hong
spellingShingle Barry W. Brook
Tom Blees
Tom M. L. Wigley
Sanghyun Hong
Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary?
Sustainability
nuclear fission
natural gas
renewable energy
climate change
energy mix
author_facet Barry W. Brook
Tom Blees
Tom M. L. Wigley
Sanghyun Hong
author_sort Barry W. Brook
title Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary?
title_short Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary?
title_full Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary?
title_fullStr Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary?
title_full_unstemmed Silver Buckshot or Bullet: Is a Future “Energy Mix” Necessary?
title_sort silver buckshot or bullet: is a future “energy mix” necessary?
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2018-01-01
description To displace fossil fuels and achieve the global greenhouse-gas emissions reductions required to meet the Paris Agreement on climate change, the prevalent argument is that a mix of different low-carbon energy sources will need to be deployed. Here we seek to challenge that viewpoint. We argue that a completely decarbonized, energy-rich and sustainable future could be achieved with a dominant deployment of next-generation nuclear fission and associated technologies for synthesizing liquid fuels and recycling waste. By contrast, non-dispatchable energy sources like wind and solar energy are arguably superfluous, other than for niche applications, and run the risk of diverting resources away from viable and holistic solutions. For instance, the pairing of variable renewables with natural-gas backup fails to address many of the entrenched problems we seek to solve. Our conclusion is that, given the urgent time frame and massive extent of the energy-replacement challenge, half-measures that distract from or stymie effective policy and infrastructure investment should be avoided.
topic nuclear fission
natural gas
renewable energy
climate change
energy mix
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/302
work_keys_str_mv AT barrywbrook silverbuckshotorbulletisafutureenergymixnecessary
AT tomblees silverbuckshotorbulletisafutureenergymixnecessary
AT tommlwigley silverbuckshotorbulletisafutureenergymixnecessary
AT sanghyunhong silverbuckshotorbulletisafutureenergymixnecessary
_version_ 1725732944348184576