Evaluation of Three New Strategies to Fight Obesity in Families

Aims. To evaluate 3 strategies to reduce weight in obese families. Research design and methods. 142 obese parents and 119 obese children kept a fat-calorie restriction diet. On top of this diet, the families were randomized in a three-factorial design to one or more of three weight-loss strategies:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Luley, A. Blaik, S. Aronica, J. Dierkes, S. Kropf, S. Westphal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2010-01-01
Series:Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/751905
id doaj-b7e5204f371648a7baa8850fe81e47aa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b7e5204f371648a7baa8850fe81e47aa2020-11-24T21:45:01ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Nutrition and Metabolism2090-07242090-07322010-01-01201010.1155/2010/751905751905Evaluation of Three New Strategies to Fight Obesity in FamiliesC. Luley0A. Blaik1S. Aronica2J. Dierkes3S. Kropf4S. Westphal5Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Otto von Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, GermanyInstitute of Clinical Chemistry, Otto von Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, GermanyInstitute of Clinical Chemistry, Otto von Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, GermanyInstitute of Clinical Chemistry, Otto von Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, GermanyInstitute of Biometry and Medical Informatics, Otto von Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, GermanyInstitute of Clinical Chemistry, Otto von Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, GermanyAims. To evaluate 3 strategies to reduce weight in obese families. Research design and methods. 142 obese parents and 119 obese children kept a fat-calorie restriction diet. On top of this diet, the families were randomized in a three-factorial design to one or more of three weight-loss strategies: (1) an additional diet preferring carbohydrates having a low glycemic index (dual diet), (2) financial incentive, and (3) telemonitoring of weight and physical activity. Results. All children improved their BMI-SDS by 0.18±0.25 (P<.001) independently of the weight-loss strategy. In parents, relative losses of weight (kg) were −6.4% versus −4.0% for dual diet versus calorie restriction (P=.029), −6.9% versus −3.4% for with or without financial incentive (P=.002), and −8.0% versus −4.8% for with or without telemonitoring (P=.033). The weight loss after financial incentive plus dual diet plus telemonitoring was −14.4%. Conclusions. All strategies were effective in adults, in particular when combined. Children improved their BMI-SDS regardless of the strategy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/751905
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. Luley
A. Blaik
S. Aronica
J. Dierkes
S. Kropf
S. Westphal
spellingShingle C. Luley
A. Blaik
S. Aronica
J. Dierkes
S. Kropf
S. Westphal
Evaluation of Three New Strategies to Fight Obesity in Families
Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
author_facet C. Luley
A. Blaik
S. Aronica
J. Dierkes
S. Kropf
S. Westphal
author_sort C. Luley
title Evaluation of Three New Strategies to Fight Obesity in Families
title_short Evaluation of Three New Strategies to Fight Obesity in Families
title_full Evaluation of Three New Strategies to Fight Obesity in Families
title_fullStr Evaluation of Three New Strategies to Fight Obesity in Families
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Three New Strategies to Fight Obesity in Families
title_sort evaluation of three new strategies to fight obesity in families
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
issn 2090-0724
2090-0732
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Aims. To evaluate 3 strategies to reduce weight in obese families. Research design and methods. 142 obese parents and 119 obese children kept a fat-calorie restriction diet. On top of this diet, the families were randomized in a three-factorial design to one or more of three weight-loss strategies: (1) an additional diet preferring carbohydrates having a low glycemic index (dual diet), (2) financial incentive, and (3) telemonitoring of weight and physical activity. Results. All children improved their BMI-SDS by 0.18±0.25 (P<.001) independently of the weight-loss strategy. In parents, relative losses of weight (kg) were −6.4% versus −4.0% for dual diet versus calorie restriction (P=.029), −6.9% versus −3.4% for with or without financial incentive (P=.002), and −8.0% versus −4.8% for with or without telemonitoring (P=.033). The weight loss after financial incentive plus dual diet plus telemonitoring was −14.4%. Conclusions. All strategies were effective in adults, in particular when combined. Children improved their BMI-SDS regardless of the strategy.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/751905
work_keys_str_mv AT cluley evaluationofthreenewstrategiestofightobesityinfamilies
AT ablaik evaluationofthreenewstrategiestofightobesityinfamilies
AT saronica evaluationofthreenewstrategiestofightobesityinfamilies
AT jdierkes evaluationofthreenewstrategiestofightobesityinfamilies
AT skropf evaluationofthreenewstrategiestofightobesityinfamilies
AT swestphal evaluationofthreenewstrategiestofightobesityinfamilies
_version_ 1725907313662885888