False-negative RT-PCR for COVID-19 and a diagnostic risk score: a retrospective cohort study among patients admitted to hospital

Objective To describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 and false-negative SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), and develop and internally validate a diagnostic risk score to predict risk of COVID-19 (including RT-PCR-negative COVID-19) amon...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ashley Whittington, Ankur Gupta-Wright, Colin Kenneth Macleod, Sarah Ann Filson, Tumena Corrah, Victoria Parris, Miriam Harris, Rachel Tennant, Nidhi Vaid, Junko Takata, Sai Duraisingham, Nemi Gandy, Harmeet Chana, Alastair McGregor, Padmasayee Papineni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/2/e047110.full
id doaj-b7ddea63897e4016939acfc4d5cba503
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ashley Whittington
Ankur Gupta-Wright
Colin Kenneth Macleod
Sarah Ann Filson
Tumena Corrah
Victoria Parris
Miriam Harris
Rachel Tennant
Nidhi Vaid
Junko Takata
Sai Duraisingham
Nemi Gandy
Harmeet Chana
Alastair McGregor
Padmasayee Papineni
spellingShingle Ashley Whittington
Ankur Gupta-Wright
Colin Kenneth Macleod
Sarah Ann Filson
Tumena Corrah
Victoria Parris
Miriam Harris
Rachel Tennant
Nidhi Vaid
Junko Takata
Sai Duraisingham
Nemi Gandy
Harmeet Chana
Alastair McGregor
Padmasayee Papineni
False-negative RT-PCR for COVID-19 and a diagnostic risk score: a retrospective cohort study among patients admitted to hospital
BMJ Open
author_facet Ashley Whittington
Ankur Gupta-Wright
Colin Kenneth Macleod
Sarah Ann Filson
Tumena Corrah
Victoria Parris
Miriam Harris
Rachel Tennant
Nidhi Vaid
Junko Takata
Sai Duraisingham
Nemi Gandy
Harmeet Chana
Alastair McGregor
Padmasayee Papineni
author_sort Ashley Whittington
title False-negative RT-PCR for COVID-19 and a diagnostic risk score: a retrospective cohort study among patients admitted to hospital
title_short False-negative RT-PCR for COVID-19 and a diagnostic risk score: a retrospective cohort study among patients admitted to hospital
title_full False-negative RT-PCR for COVID-19 and a diagnostic risk score: a retrospective cohort study among patients admitted to hospital
title_fullStr False-negative RT-PCR for COVID-19 and a diagnostic risk score: a retrospective cohort study among patients admitted to hospital
title_full_unstemmed False-negative RT-PCR for COVID-19 and a diagnostic risk score: a retrospective cohort study among patients admitted to hospital
title_sort false-negative rt-pcr for covid-19 and a diagnostic risk score: a retrospective cohort study among patients admitted to hospital
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Objective To describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 and false-negative SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), and develop and internally validate a diagnostic risk score to predict risk of COVID-19 (including RT-PCR-negative COVID-19) among medical admissions.Design Retrospective cohort study.Setting Two hospitals within an acute NHS Trust in London, UK.Participants All patients admitted to medical wards between 2 March and 3 May 2020.Outcomes Main outcomes were diagnosis of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results, sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and mortality during hospital admission. For the diagnostic risk score, we report discrimination, calibration and diagnostic accuracy of the model and simplified risk score and internal validation.Results 4008 patients were admitted between 2 March and 3 May 2020. 1792 patients (44.8%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, of whom 1391 were SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive and 283 had only negative RT-PCRs. Compared with a clinical reference standard, sensitivity of RT-PCR in hospital patients was 83.1% (95% CI 81.2%–84.8%). Broadly, patients with false-negative RT-PCR COVID-19 and those confirmed by positive PCR had similar demographic and clinical characteristics but lower risk of intensive care unit admission and lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27–0.61). A simple diagnostic risk score comprising of age, sex, ethnicity, cough, fever or shortness of breath, National Early Warning Score 2, C reactive protein and chest radiograph appearance had moderate discrimination (area under the receiver–operator curve 0.83, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.85), good calibration and was internally validated.Conclusion RT-PCR-negative COVID-19 is common and is associated with lower mortality despite similar presentation. Diagnostic risk scores could potentially help triage patients requiring admission but need external validation.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/2/e047110.full
work_keys_str_mv AT ashleywhittington falsenegativertpcrforcovid19andadiagnosticriskscorearetrospectivecohortstudyamongpatientsadmittedtohospital
AT ankurguptawright falsenegativertpcrforcovid19andadiagnosticriskscorearetrospectivecohortstudyamongpatientsadmittedtohospital
AT colinkennethmacleod falsenegativertpcrforcovid19andadiagnosticriskscorearetrospectivecohortstudyamongpatientsadmittedtohospital
AT sarahannfilson falsenegativertpcrforcovid19andadiagnosticriskscorearetrospectivecohortstudyamongpatientsadmittedtohospital
AT tumenacorrah falsenegativertpcrforcovid19andadiagnosticriskscorearetrospectivecohortstudyamongpatientsadmittedtohospital
AT victoriaparris falsenegativertpcrforcovid19andadiagnosticriskscorearetrospectivecohortstudyamongpatientsadmittedtohospital
AT miriamharris falsenegativertpcrforcovid19andadiagnosticriskscorearetrospectivecohortstudyamongpatientsadmittedtohospital
AT racheltennant falsenegativertpcrforcovid19andadiagnosticriskscorearetrospectivecohortstudyamongpatientsadmittedtohospital
AT nidhivaid falsenegativertpcrforcovid19andadiagnosticriskscorearetrospectivecohortstudyamongpatientsadmittedtohospital
AT junkotakata falsenegativertpcrforcovid19andadiagnosticriskscorearetrospectivecohortstudyamongpatientsadmittedtohospital
AT saiduraisingham falsenegativertpcrforcovid19andadiagnosticriskscorearetrospectivecohortstudyamongpatientsadmittedtohospital
AT nemigandy falsenegativertpcrforcovid19andadiagnosticriskscorearetrospectivecohortstudyamongpatientsadmittedtohospital
AT harmeetchana falsenegativertpcrforcovid19andadiagnosticriskscorearetrospectivecohortstudyamongpatientsadmittedtohospital
AT alastairmcgregor falsenegativertpcrforcovid19andadiagnosticriskscorearetrospectivecohortstudyamongpatientsadmittedtohospital
AT padmasayeepapineni falsenegativertpcrforcovid19andadiagnosticriskscorearetrospectivecohortstudyamongpatientsadmittedtohospital
_version_ 1721359723621515264
spelling doaj-b7ddea63897e4016939acfc4d5cba5032021-06-25T13:32:49ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-02-0111210.1136/bmjopen-2020-047110False-negative RT-PCR for COVID-19 and a diagnostic risk score: a retrospective cohort study among patients admitted to hospitalAshley Whittington0Ankur Gupta-Wright1Colin Kenneth Macleod2Sarah Ann Filson3Tumena Corrah4Victoria Parris5Miriam Harris6Rachel Tennant7Nidhi Vaid8Junko Takata9Sai Duraisingham10Nemi Gandy11Harmeet Chana12Alastair McGregor13Padmasayee Papineni14Department of Infectious Diseases, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UKInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UKClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UKDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UKDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Ealing Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UKDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UKDepartment of Acute Medicine, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UKDepartment of Acute Medicine, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UKDepartment of Elderly Care, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UKDepartment of Elderly Care, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UKDepartment of Radiology, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UKDepartment of Radiology, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UKDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UKDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Ealing Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UKObjective To describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 and false-negative SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), and develop and internally validate a diagnostic risk score to predict risk of COVID-19 (including RT-PCR-negative COVID-19) among medical admissions.Design Retrospective cohort study.Setting Two hospitals within an acute NHS Trust in London, UK.Participants All patients admitted to medical wards between 2 March and 3 May 2020.Outcomes Main outcomes were diagnosis of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results, sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and mortality during hospital admission. For the diagnostic risk score, we report discrimination, calibration and diagnostic accuracy of the model and simplified risk score and internal validation.Results 4008 patients were admitted between 2 March and 3 May 2020. 1792 patients (44.8%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, of whom 1391 were SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive and 283 had only negative RT-PCRs. Compared with a clinical reference standard, sensitivity of RT-PCR in hospital patients was 83.1% (95% CI 81.2%–84.8%). Broadly, patients with false-negative RT-PCR COVID-19 and those confirmed by positive PCR had similar demographic and clinical characteristics but lower risk of intensive care unit admission and lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27–0.61). A simple diagnostic risk score comprising of age, sex, ethnicity, cough, fever or shortness of breath, National Early Warning Score 2, C reactive protein and chest radiograph appearance had moderate discrimination (area under the receiver–operator curve 0.83, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.85), good calibration and was internally validated.Conclusion RT-PCR-negative COVID-19 is common and is associated with lower mortality despite similar presentation. Diagnostic risk scores could potentially help triage patients requiring admission but need external validation.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/2/e047110.full