Bond strength of surface-treated novel high translucent zirconia to enamel

Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of zirconia, stabilised with 5% yttria, luted to enamel and to evaluate the fracture pattern at loss of retention. Methods: A total of 53 test specimen were manufactured from two partially stabilised zirconia materials, Zirkon...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Ågren, Wen Kou, Margareta Molin Thorén
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-12-01
Series:Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1684200
id doaj-b7db04b72b8d46b2aefecafcd734d136
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b7db04b72b8d46b2aefecafcd734d1362020-11-25T00:53:56ZengTaylor & Francis GroupBiomaterial Investigations in Dentistry2641-52752019-12-0161354210.1080/26415275.2019.16842001684200Bond strength of surface-treated novel high translucent zirconia to enamelMartin Ågren0Wen Kou1Margareta Molin Thorén2Prosthodontic Specialist Clinic, Public Dental Service of Västerbotten, Region Västerbotten, Umeå, Sweden; Dental Material Science, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Prosthetic Dentistry, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, SwedenAim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of zirconia, stabilised with 5% yttria, luted to enamel and to evaluate the fracture pattern at loss of retention. Methods: A total of 53 test specimen were manufactured from two partially stabilised zirconia materials, Zirkonzahn Prettau Anterior (ZPA) (n = 16) and Whitepeaks CopraSmile Symphony 5 layer (WCS) (n = 18), and a lithium disilicate (Ivoclar e.Max Press) (n = 19) acting as control. All test specimens were cemented to human enamel with Variolink Esthetic DC and then subjected to a shear bond strength test. Fracture and surface analysis were performed using light and scanning electron microscope. Results: No significant differences in shear bond strength were detected when analysing the three groups. Dividing them according to the fracture pattern significant difference in shear bond strength between the two zirconia groups could be seen analysing test bodies with failure of adhesion to the test body, but not to enamel. The ZPA had higher shear bond strength (23.68 MPa) than WCS (13.00 MPa). No significant differences were seen compared to the control group (19.02 MPa). Conclusion: Partially stabilised zirconia shows potential as a material to be used where macro mechanical bonding is not possible, although this study does not reveal how or if the bonding deteriorates over time.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1684200shear strengthzirconium dioxidedental bondingdental veneers
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin Ågren
Wen Kou
Margareta Molin Thorén
spellingShingle Martin Ågren
Wen Kou
Margareta Molin Thorén
Bond strength of surface-treated novel high translucent zirconia to enamel
Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry
shear strength
zirconium dioxide
dental bonding
dental veneers
author_facet Martin Ågren
Wen Kou
Margareta Molin Thorén
author_sort Martin Ågren
title Bond strength of surface-treated novel high translucent zirconia to enamel
title_short Bond strength of surface-treated novel high translucent zirconia to enamel
title_full Bond strength of surface-treated novel high translucent zirconia to enamel
title_fullStr Bond strength of surface-treated novel high translucent zirconia to enamel
title_full_unstemmed Bond strength of surface-treated novel high translucent zirconia to enamel
title_sort bond strength of surface-treated novel high translucent zirconia to enamel
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry
issn 2641-5275
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of zirconia, stabilised with 5% yttria, luted to enamel and to evaluate the fracture pattern at loss of retention. Methods: A total of 53 test specimen were manufactured from two partially stabilised zirconia materials, Zirkonzahn Prettau Anterior (ZPA) (n = 16) and Whitepeaks CopraSmile Symphony 5 layer (WCS) (n = 18), and a lithium disilicate (Ivoclar e.Max Press) (n = 19) acting as control. All test specimens were cemented to human enamel with Variolink Esthetic DC and then subjected to a shear bond strength test. Fracture and surface analysis were performed using light and scanning electron microscope. Results: No significant differences in shear bond strength were detected when analysing the three groups. Dividing them according to the fracture pattern significant difference in shear bond strength between the two zirconia groups could be seen analysing test bodies with failure of adhesion to the test body, but not to enamel. The ZPA had higher shear bond strength (23.68 MPa) than WCS (13.00 MPa). No significant differences were seen compared to the control group (19.02 MPa). Conclusion: Partially stabilised zirconia shows potential as a material to be used where macro mechanical bonding is not possible, although this study does not reveal how or if the bonding deteriorates over time.
topic shear strength
zirconium dioxide
dental bonding
dental veneers
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1684200
work_keys_str_mv AT martinagren bondstrengthofsurfacetreatednovelhightranslucentzirconiatoenamel
AT wenkou bondstrengthofsurfacetreatednovelhightranslucentzirconiatoenamel
AT margaretamolinthoren bondstrengthofsurfacetreatednovelhightranslucentzirconiatoenamel
_version_ 1725235816124383232