Filosofie náboženství mezi ortodoxií a romantikou

The article demonstrates that liberal theology, as represented by Schleiermacher, is not a new form of Christianity, but rather marks a separation from the earlier dogmatic tradition. What is characteristic for Christian orthodoxy is a “propositional understanding of revelation”, consisting in sente...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stanislav Sousedík
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: Karolinum Press and Oikoymenh Press 2018-02-01
Series:Reflexe
Online Access:https://www.reflexe.cz/Reflexe_52/Filosofie_nabozenstvi_mezi_ortodoxii_a_romantikou.html
id doaj-b7d92cd45b614ba8a5184a09ceaaa167
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b7d92cd45b614ba8a5184a09ceaaa1672020-11-25T02:53:14ZcesKarolinum Press and Oikoymenh PressReflexe0862-69012533-76372018-02-01201752477010.14712/25337637.2017.165770Filosofie náboženství mezi ortodoxií a romantikouStanislav SousedíkThe article demonstrates that liberal theology, as represented by Schleiermacher, is not a new form of Christianity, but rather marks a separation from the earlier dogmatic tradition. What is characteristic for Christian orthodoxy is a “propositional understanding of revelation”, consisting in sentences addressed by God to mankind. Against this background, faith presupposes philosophical justification of God’s existence. This conviction was rejected by Hume and Kant and the rejection subsequently provoked two types of reaction: among Catholics, it led to a renaissance of the Aristotelian-Scholastic philosophy, whereas among Protestants, Schleiermacher attempted to transfer the essence of Christianity into subjectivity. In fact, however, such a subjectivized religion is a negation of Christianity. An analysis of human subjectivity shows that the solution to the problems of human condition can come only from really existing God.https://www.reflexe.cz/Reflexe_52/Filosofie_nabozenstvi_mezi_ortodoxii_a_romantikou.html
collection DOAJ
language ces
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stanislav Sousedík
spellingShingle Stanislav Sousedík
Filosofie náboženství mezi ortodoxií a romantikou
Reflexe
author_facet Stanislav Sousedík
author_sort Stanislav Sousedík
title Filosofie náboženství mezi ortodoxií a romantikou
title_short Filosofie náboženství mezi ortodoxií a romantikou
title_full Filosofie náboženství mezi ortodoxií a romantikou
title_fullStr Filosofie náboženství mezi ortodoxií a romantikou
title_full_unstemmed Filosofie náboženství mezi ortodoxií a romantikou
title_sort filosofie náboženství mezi ortodoxií a romantikou
publisher Karolinum Press and Oikoymenh Press
series Reflexe
issn 0862-6901
2533-7637
publishDate 2018-02-01
description The article demonstrates that liberal theology, as represented by Schleiermacher, is not a new form of Christianity, but rather marks a separation from the earlier dogmatic tradition. What is characteristic for Christian orthodoxy is a “propositional understanding of revelation”, consisting in sentences addressed by God to mankind. Against this background, faith presupposes philosophical justification of God’s existence. This conviction was rejected by Hume and Kant and the rejection subsequently provoked two types of reaction: among Catholics, it led to a renaissance of the Aristotelian-Scholastic philosophy, whereas among Protestants, Schleiermacher attempted to transfer the essence of Christianity into subjectivity. In fact, however, such a subjectivized religion is a negation of Christianity. An analysis of human subjectivity shows that the solution to the problems of human condition can come only from really existing God.
url https://www.reflexe.cz/Reflexe_52/Filosofie_nabozenstvi_mezi_ortodoxii_a_romantikou.html
work_keys_str_mv AT stanislavsousedik filosofienabozenstvimeziortodoxiiaromantikou
_version_ 1724725878097707008