The Institute of Representation in the Civil Process of Russia: Trends and Development Prospects

Art. 48 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation guarantees everyone the right to qualified legal assistance. The question of the means and methods it should be provided with has been debated between lawyers for a long time. A number of scientists talk about the need for legislative consolidati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Natalya Andreevna Chudinovskaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego 2019-01-01
Series:Acta Iuris Stetinensis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wnus.edu.pl/ais/pl/issue/1177/article/18684/
id doaj-b7d4403f79a84c32ad66ca2861e87ec7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b7d4403f79a84c32ad66ca2861e87ec72020-11-25T03:35:23ZengWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu SzczecińskiegoActa Iuris Stetinensis2083-43732019-01-012710.18276/ais.2019.27-03The Institute of Representation in the Civil Process of Russia: Trends and Development ProspectsNatalya Andreevna Chudinovskaya0Urals State Law UniversityArt. 48 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation guarantees everyone the right to qualified legal assistance. The question of the means and methods it should be provided with has been debated between lawyers for a long time. A number of scientists talk about the need for legislative consolidation of the ‘advocate monopoly’. Others consider it appropriate to license the legal services market. These disputes remain relevant today. However, in 2019, Russia has undergone a reform of procedural law, which lawyers have called a ‘process revolution.’ Many rules of procedural codes have undergone major changes. In particular, as a result of the reform, the requirements for persons who may act as representatives in civil matters have been substantially changed. In the framework of this article, an attempt is made to analyse the reform of the institution of representation. Based on a systematic analysis of procedural legislation and law enforcement practice, the author comes to the conclusion that legislative consolidation of the need for higher legal education for representatives can be called one of the positive aspects of the reform. This article provides an analysis of the development trends of the institution of representation in the historical aspect. The author concludes that it is maintaining logical and consistent movement along the path of becoming an‘advocate monopoly’ in Russia. It seems that subject to its competent and phased introduction, as well as the reform of the corps of the bar itself, not only by increasing its number but above all by increasing the professionalism of its members, it can and should become an effective tool in the civil process.https://wnus.edu.pl/ais/pl/issue/1177/article/18684/civil procedurerepresentationprofessional legal assistancehigher legal education
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Natalya Andreevna Chudinovskaya
spellingShingle Natalya Andreevna Chudinovskaya
The Institute of Representation in the Civil Process of Russia: Trends and Development Prospects
Acta Iuris Stetinensis
civil procedure
representation
professional legal assistance
higher legal education
author_facet Natalya Andreevna Chudinovskaya
author_sort Natalya Andreevna Chudinovskaya
title The Institute of Representation in the Civil Process of Russia: Trends and Development Prospects
title_short The Institute of Representation in the Civil Process of Russia: Trends and Development Prospects
title_full The Institute of Representation in the Civil Process of Russia: Trends and Development Prospects
title_fullStr The Institute of Representation in the Civil Process of Russia: Trends and Development Prospects
title_full_unstemmed The Institute of Representation in the Civil Process of Russia: Trends and Development Prospects
title_sort institute of representation in the civil process of russia: trends and development prospects
publisher Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
series Acta Iuris Stetinensis
issn 2083-4373
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Art. 48 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation guarantees everyone the right to qualified legal assistance. The question of the means and methods it should be provided with has been debated between lawyers for a long time. A number of scientists talk about the need for legislative consolidation of the ‘advocate monopoly’. Others consider it appropriate to license the legal services market. These disputes remain relevant today. However, in 2019, Russia has undergone a reform of procedural law, which lawyers have called a ‘process revolution.’ Many rules of procedural codes have undergone major changes. In particular, as a result of the reform, the requirements for persons who may act as representatives in civil matters have been substantially changed. In the framework of this article, an attempt is made to analyse the reform of the institution of representation. Based on a systematic analysis of procedural legislation and law enforcement practice, the author comes to the conclusion that legislative consolidation of the need for higher legal education for representatives can be called one of the positive aspects of the reform. This article provides an analysis of the development trends of the institution of representation in the historical aspect. The author concludes that it is maintaining logical and consistent movement along the path of becoming an‘advocate monopoly’ in Russia. It seems that subject to its competent and phased introduction, as well as the reform of the corps of the bar itself, not only by increasing its number but above all by increasing the professionalism of its members, it can and should become an effective tool in the civil process.
topic civil procedure
representation
professional legal assistance
higher legal education
url https://wnus.edu.pl/ais/pl/issue/1177/article/18684/
work_keys_str_mv AT natalyaandreevnachudinovskaya theinstituteofrepresentationinthecivilprocessofrussiatrendsanddevelopmentprospects
AT natalyaandreevnachudinovskaya instituteofrepresentationinthecivilprocessofrussiatrendsanddevelopmentprospects
_version_ 1724554721081950208