An analytical method reduces noise bias in motor adaptation analysis

Abstract When a person makes a movement, a motor error is typically observed that then drives motor planning corrections on subsequent movements. This error correction, quantified as a trial-by-trial adaptation rate, provides insight into how the nervous system is operating, particularly regarding h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel H. Blustein, Ahmed W. Shehata, Erin S. Kuylenstierna, Kevin B. Englehart, Jonathon W. Sensinger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-04-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88688-5
id doaj-b7caee3e1b9248a99245db0864fe6e0d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b7caee3e1b9248a99245db0864fe6e0d2021-05-02T11:36:29ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-04-0111111210.1038/s41598-021-88688-5An analytical method reduces noise bias in motor adaptation analysisDaniel H. Blustein0Ahmed W. Shehata1Erin S. Kuylenstierna2Kevin B. Englehart3Jonathon W. Sensinger4Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Rhodes CollegeDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of AlbertaDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Rhodes CollegeInstitute of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New BrunswickInstitute of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New BrunswickAbstract When a person makes a movement, a motor error is typically observed that then drives motor planning corrections on subsequent movements. This error correction, quantified as a trial-by-trial adaptation rate, provides insight into how the nervous system is operating, particularly regarding how much confidence a person places in different sources of information such as sensory feedback or motor command reproducibility. Traditional analysis has required carefully controlled laboratory conditions such as the application of perturbations or error clamping, limiting the usefulness of motor analysis in clinical and everyday environments. Here we focus on error adaptation during unperturbed and naturalistic movements. With increasing motor noise, we show that the conventional estimation of trial-by-trial adaptation increases, a counterintuitive finding that is the consequence of systematic bias in the estimate due to noise masking the learner’s intention. We present an analytic solution relying on stochastic signal processing to reduce this effect of noise, producing an estimate of motor adaptation with reduced bias. The result is an improved estimate of trial-by-trial adaptation in a human learner compared to conventional methods. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the new method in analyzing simulated and empirical movement data under different noise conditions.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88688-5
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel H. Blustein
Ahmed W. Shehata
Erin S. Kuylenstierna
Kevin B. Englehart
Jonathon W. Sensinger
spellingShingle Daniel H. Blustein
Ahmed W. Shehata
Erin S. Kuylenstierna
Kevin B. Englehart
Jonathon W. Sensinger
An analytical method reduces noise bias in motor adaptation analysis
Scientific Reports
author_facet Daniel H. Blustein
Ahmed W. Shehata
Erin S. Kuylenstierna
Kevin B. Englehart
Jonathon W. Sensinger
author_sort Daniel H. Blustein
title An analytical method reduces noise bias in motor adaptation analysis
title_short An analytical method reduces noise bias in motor adaptation analysis
title_full An analytical method reduces noise bias in motor adaptation analysis
title_fullStr An analytical method reduces noise bias in motor adaptation analysis
title_full_unstemmed An analytical method reduces noise bias in motor adaptation analysis
title_sort analytical method reduces noise bias in motor adaptation analysis
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Abstract When a person makes a movement, a motor error is typically observed that then drives motor planning corrections on subsequent movements. This error correction, quantified as a trial-by-trial adaptation rate, provides insight into how the nervous system is operating, particularly regarding how much confidence a person places in different sources of information such as sensory feedback or motor command reproducibility. Traditional analysis has required carefully controlled laboratory conditions such as the application of perturbations or error clamping, limiting the usefulness of motor analysis in clinical and everyday environments. Here we focus on error adaptation during unperturbed and naturalistic movements. With increasing motor noise, we show that the conventional estimation of trial-by-trial adaptation increases, a counterintuitive finding that is the consequence of systematic bias in the estimate due to noise masking the learner’s intention. We present an analytic solution relying on stochastic signal processing to reduce this effect of noise, producing an estimate of motor adaptation with reduced bias. The result is an improved estimate of trial-by-trial adaptation in a human learner compared to conventional methods. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the new method in analyzing simulated and empirical movement data under different noise conditions.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88688-5
work_keys_str_mv AT danielhblustein ananalyticalmethodreducesnoisebiasinmotoradaptationanalysis
AT ahmedwshehata ananalyticalmethodreducesnoisebiasinmotoradaptationanalysis
AT erinskuylenstierna ananalyticalmethodreducesnoisebiasinmotoradaptationanalysis
AT kevinbenglehart ananalyticalmethodreducesnoisebiasinmotoradaptationanalysis
AT jonathonwsensinger ananalyticalmethodreducesnoisebiasinmotoradaptationanalysis
AT danielhblustein analyticalmethodreducesnoisebiasinmotoradaptationanalysis
AT ahmedwshehata analyticalmethodreducesnoisebiasinmotoradaptationanalysis
AT erinskuylenstierna analyticalmethodreducesnoisebiasinmotoradaptationanalysis
AT kevinbenglehart analyticalmethodreducesnoisebiasinmotoradaptationanalysis
AT jonathonwsensinger analyticalmethodreducesnoisebiasinmotoradaptationanalysis
_version_ 1721491959225253888