Reconciling Social and Biological Needs in an Endangered Ecosystem: the Palouse as a Model for Bioregional Planning

The Palouse region of southeastern Washington State and an adjacent portion of northern Idaho is a working landscape dominated by agricultural production, with less than 1% of the original bunchgrass prairie remaining. Government agencies and conservation groups have begun efforts to conserve Palou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shannon M. Donovan, Chris Looney, Thor Hanson, Yaniria Sánchez de León, J. D. Wulfhorst, Sanford D. Eigenbrode, Michael Jennings, Jodi Johnson-Maynard, Nilsa A. Bosque Pérez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2009-06-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art9/
id doaj-b7c80390170443f99a945bfa88d2fd7c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b7c80390170443f99a945bfa88d2fd7c2020-11-24T22:15:58ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872009-06-01141910.5751/ES-02736-1401092736Reconciling Social and Biological Needs in an Endangered Ecosystem: the Palouse as a Model for Bioregional PlanningShannon M. Donovan0Chris Looney1Thor Hanson2Yaniria Sánchez de León3J. D. Wulfhorst4Sanford D. Eigenbrode5Michael Jennings6Jodi Johnson-Maynard7Nilsa A. Bosque Pérez8University of IdahoUniversity of IdahoUniversity of IdahoUniversity of IdahoUniversity of IdahoUniversity of IdahoThe Nature ConservancyUniversity of IdahoUniversity of IdahoThe Palouse region of southeastern Washington State and an adjacent portion of northern Idaho is a working landscape dominated by agricultural production, with less than 1% of the original bunchgrass prairie remaining. Government agencies and conservation groups have begun efforts to conserve Palouse prairie remnants, but they lack critical information about attitudes and perceptions among local landowners toward biological conservation. Knowledge about the location and condition of native biological communities also remains sparse. Using a bioregional approach, we integrated data collected through biological surveys and social interviews to investigate relationships between biologically and socially meaningful aspects of the landscape. We combined GIS layers of participant-identified meaningful places with maps of native biological communities to identify the overlap between these data sets. We used these maps and interview narratives to interpret how stakeholder perceptions of the landscape corresponded with patterns of native biodiversity. We found several prominent landscape features on the Palouse that supported diverse biological communities and were important to stakeholders for multiple reasons. These places may be expedient focal points for conservation efforts. However, the many small prairie remnants on the Palouse, although ecologically important, were mostly unidentified by participants in this study and thus warrant a different conservation approach. These findings will assist government agencies and conservation groups in crafting conservation strategies that consider stakeholder perceptions and their connection with the Palouse landscape. This study also demonstrates how GIS tools can link biological and social data sets to aid conservation efforts on private land.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art9/landscapeparticipatory researchspatial mappingbiodiversityconservationprivate lands
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shannon M. Donovan
Chris Looney
Thor Hanson
Yaniria Sánchez de León
J. D. Wulfhorst
Sanford D. Eigenbrode
Michael Jennings
Jodi Johnson-Maynard
Nilsa A. Bosque Pérez
spellingShingle Shannon M. Donovan
Chris Looney
Thor Hanson
Yaniria Sánchez de León
J. D. Wulfhorst
Sanford D. Eigenbrode
Michael Jennings
Jodi Johnson-Maynard
Nilsa A. Bosque Pérez
Reconciling Social and Biological Needs in an Endangered Ecosystem: the Palouse as a Model for Bioregional Planning
Ecology and Society
landscape
participatory research
spatial mapping
biodiversity
conservation
private lands
author_facet Shannon M. Donovan
Chris Looney
Thor Hanson
Yaniria Sánchez de León
J. D. Wulfhorst
Sanford D. Eigenbrode
Michael Jennings
Jodi Johnson-Maynard
Nilsa A. Bosque Pérez
author_sort Shannon M. Donovan
title Reconciling Social and Biological Needs in an Endangered Ecosystem: the Palouse as a Model for Bioregional Planning
title_short Reconciling Social and Biological Needs in an Endangered Ecosystem: the Palouse as a Model for Bioregional Planning
title_full Reconciling Social and Biological Needs in an Endangered Ecosystem: the Palouse as a Model for Bioregional Planning
title_fullStr Reconciling Social and Biological Needs in an Endangered Ecosystem: the Palouse as a Model for Bioregional Planning
title_full_unstemmed Reconciling Social and Biological Needs in an Endangered Ecosystem: the Palouse as a Model for Bioregional Planning
title_sort reconciling social and biological needs in an endangered ecosystem: the palouse as a model for bioregional planning
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2009-06-01
description The Palouse region of southeastern Washington State and an adjacent portion of northern Idaho is a working landscape dominated by agricultural production, with less than 1% of the original bunchgrass prairie remaining. Government agencies and conservation groups have begun efforts to conserve Palouse prairie remnants, but they lack critical information about attitudes and perceptions among local landowners toward biological conservation. Knowledge about the location and condition of native biological communities also remains sparse. Using a bioregional approach, we integrated data collected through biological surveys and social interviews to investigate relationships between biologically and socially meaningful aspects of the landscape. We combined GIS layers of participant-identified meaningful places with maps of native biological communities to identify the overlap between these data sets. We used these maps and interview narratives to interpret how stakeholder perceptions of the landscape corresponded with patterns of native biodiversity. We found several prominent landscape features on the Palouse that supported diverse biological communities and were important to stakeholders for multiple reasons. These places may be expedient focal points for conservation efforts. However, the many small prairie remnants on the Palouse, although ecologically important, were mostly unidentified by participants in this study and thus warrant a different conservation approach. These findings will assist government agencies and conservation groups in crafting conservation strategies that consider stakeholder perceptions and their connection with the Palouse landscape. This study also demonstrates how GIS tools can link biological and social data sets to aid conservation efforts on private land.
topic landscape
participatory research
spatial mapping
biodiversity
conservation
private lands
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art9/
work_keys_str_mv AT shannonmdonovan reconcilingsocialandbiologicalneedsinanendangeredecosystemthepalouseasamodelforbioregionalplanning
AT chrislooney reconcilingsocialandbiologicalneedsinanendangeredecosystemthepalouseasamodelforbioregionalplanning
AT thorhanson reconcilingsocialandbiologicalneedsinanendangeredecosystemthepalouseasamodelforbioregionalplanning
AT yaniriasanchezdeleon reconcilingsocialandbiologicalneedsinanendangeredecosystemthepalouseasamodelforbioregionalplanning
AT jdwulfhorst reconcilingsocialandbiologicalneedsinanendangeredecosystemthepalouseasamodelforbioregionalplanning
AT sanforddeigenbrode reconcilingsocialandbiologicalneedsinanendangeredecosystemthepalouseasamodelforbioregionalplanning
AT michaeljennings reconcilingsocialandbiologicalneedsinanendangeredecosystemthepalouseasamodelforbioregionalplanning
AT jodijohnsonmaynard reconcilingsocialandbiologicalneedsinanendangeredecosystemthepalouseasamodelforbioregionalplanning
AT nilsaabosqueperez reconcilingsocialandbiologicalneedsinanendangeredecosystemthepalouseasamodelforbioregionalplanning
_version_ 1716573881725091840