A semiparametric cluster detection method — a comprehensive power comparison with Kulldorff's method

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A semiparametric density ratio method which borrows strength from two or more samples can be applied to moving window of variable size in cluster detection. The method requires neither the prior knowledge of the underlying distributi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kedem Benjamin, Wen Shihua
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-12-01
Series:International Journal of Health Geographics
Online Access:http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/8/1/73
id doaj-b7c5b61a2d80424f849789a7a5f23a8a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b7c5b61a2d80424f849789a7a5f23a8a2020-11-24T22:01:12ZengBMCInternational Journal of Health Geographics1476-072X2009-12-01817310.1186/1476-072X-8-73A semiparametric cluster detection method — a comprehensive power comparison with Kulldorff's methodKedem BenjaminWen Shihua<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A semiparametric density ratio method which borrows strength from two or more samples can be applied to moving window of variable size in cluster detection. The method requires neither the prior knowledge of the underlying distribution nor the number of cases before scanning. In this paper, the semiparametric cluster detection procedure is combined with Storey's <it>q</it>-value, a type of controlling false discovery rate (FDR) method, to take into account the multiple testing problem induced by the overlapping scanning windows.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>It is shown by simulations that for binary data, using Kulldorff's Northeastern benchmark data, the semiparametric method and Kulldorff's method performs similarly well. When the data are not binary, the semiparametric methodology still works in many cases, but Kulldorff's method requires the choices of a correct probability model, namely the correct scan statistic, in order to achieve comparable power as the semiparametric method achieves. Kulldorff's method with an inappropriate probability model may lose power.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The semiparametric method proposed in the paper can achieve good power when detecting localized cluster. The method does not require a specific distributional assumption other than the tilt function. In addition, it is possible to adapt other scan schemes (e.g., elliptic spatial scan, flexible shape scan) to search for clusters as well.</p> http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/8/1/73
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kedem Benjamin
Wen Shihua
spellingShingle Kedem Benjamin
Wen Shihua
A semiparametric cluster detection method — a comprehensive power comparison with Kulldorff's method
International Journal of Health Geographics
author_facet Kedem Benjamin
Wen Shihua
author_sort Kedem Benjamin
title A semiparametric cluster detection method — a comprehensive power comparison with Kulldorff's method
title_short A semiparametric cluster detection method — a comprehensive power comparison with Kulldorff's method
title_full A semiparametric cluster detection method — a comprehensive power comparison with Kulldorff's method
title_fullStr A semiparametric cluster detection method — a comprehensive power comparison with Kulldorff's method
title_full_unstemmed A semiparametric cluster detection method — a comprehensive power comparison with Kulldorff's method
title_sort semiparametric cluster detection method — a comprehensive power comparison with kulldorff's method
publisher BMC
series International Journal of Health Geographics
issn 1476-072X
publishDate 2009-12-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A semiparametric density ratio method which borrows strength from two or more samples can be applied to moving window of variable size in cluster detection. The method requires neither the prior knowledge of the underlying distribution nor the number of cases before scanning. In this paper, the semiparametric cluster detection procedure is combined with Storey's <it>q</it>-value, a type of controlling false discovery rate (FDR) method, to take into account the multiple testing problem induced by the overlapping scanning windows.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>It is shown by simulations that for binary data, using Kulldorff's Northeastern benchmark data, the semiparametric method and Kulldorff's method performs similarly well. When the data are not binary, the semiparametric methodology still works in many cases, but Kulldorff's method requires the choices of a correct probability model, namely the correct scan statistic, in order to achieve comparable power as the semiparametric method achieves. Kulldorff's method with an inappropriate probability model may lose power.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The semiparametric method proposed in the paper can achieve good power when detecting localized cluster. The method does not require a specific distributional assumption other than the tilt function. In addition, it is possible to adapt other scan schemes (e.g., elliptic spatial scan, flexible shape scan) to search for clusters as well.</p>
url http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/8/1/73
work_keys_str_mv AT kedembenjamin asemiparametricclusterdetectionmethodacomprehensivepowercomparisonwithkulldorffsmethod
AT wenshihua asemiparametricclusterdetectionmethodacomprehensivepowercomparisonwithkulldorffsmethod
AT kedembenjamin semiparametricclusterdetectionmethodacomprehensivepowercomparisonwithkulldorffsmethod
AT wenshihua semiparametricclusterdetectionmethodacomprehensivepowercomparisonwithkulldorffsmethod
_version_ 1725841144513822720