The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Clinical practice guidelines have been developed aiming to improve the quality of care. The implementation of the computerized clinical guidelines (CCG) has been supported by the development of computerized clinical decision support...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Galasso Rocco, Sicuro Lorella, Almiento Roberta, Colosimo Simona C, Pinnarelli Luigi, Damiani Gianfranco, Sommella Lorenzo, Ricciardi Walter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-01-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/2
id doaj-b7952cb508794ab8b292f4d2d2e01df9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b7952cb508794ab8b292f4d2d2e01df92020-11-24T21:25:19ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632010-01-01101210.1186/1472-6963-10-2The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic reviewGalasso RoccoSicuro LorellaAlmiento RobertaColosimo Simona CPinnarelli LuigiDamiani GianfrancoSommella LorenzoRicciardi Walter<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Clinical practice guidelines have been developed aiming to improve the quality of care. The implementation of the computerized clinical guidelines (CCG) has been supported by the development of computerized clinical decision support systems.</p> <p>This systematic review assesses the impact of CCG on the process of care compared with non-computerized clinical guidelines.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Specific features of CCG were studied through an extensive search of scientific literature, querying electronic databases: Pubmed/Medline, Embase and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. A multivariable logistic regression was carried out to evaluate the association of CCG's features with positive effect on the process of care.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Forty-five articles were selected. The logistic model showed that Automatic provision of recommendation in electronic version as part of clinician workflow (Odds Ratio [OR]= 17.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-193.7) and Publication Year (OR = 6.7; 95%CI: 1.3-34.3) were statistically significant predictors.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>From the research that has been carried out, we can conclude that after implementation of CCG significant improvements in process of care are shown. Our findings also suggest clinicians, managers and other health care decision makers which features of CCG might improve the structure of computerized system.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Galasso Rocco
Sicuro Lorella
Almiento Roberta
Colosimo Simona C
Pinnarelli Luigi
Damiani Gianfranco
Sommella Lorenzo
Ricciardi Walter
spellingShingle Galasso Rocco
Sicuro Lorella
Almiento Roberta
Colosimo Simona C
Pinnarelli Luigi
Damiani Gianfranco
Sommella Lorenzo
Ricciardi Walter
The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet Galasso Rocco
Sicuro Lorella
Almiento Roberta
Colosimo Simona C
Pinnarelli Luigi
Damiani Gianfranco
Sommella Lorenzo
Ricciardi Walter
author_sort Galasso Rocco
title The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review
title_short The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review
title_full The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review
title_fullStr The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review
title_sort effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2010-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Clinical practice guidelines have been developed aiming to improve the quality of care. The implementation of the computerized clinical guidelines (CCG) has been supported by the development of computerized clinical decision support systems.</p> <p>This systematic review assesses the impact of CCG on the process of care compared with non-computerized clinical guidelines.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Specific features of CCG were studied through an extensive search of scientific literature, querying electronic databases: Pubmed/Medline, Embase and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. A multivariable logistic regression was carried out to evaluate the association of CCG's features with positive effect on the process of care.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Forty-five articles were selected. The logistic model showed that Automatic provision of recommendation in electronic version as part of clinician workflow (Odds Ratio [OR]= 17.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-193.7) and Publication Year (OR = 6.7; 95%CI: 1.3-34.3) were statistically significant predictors.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>From the research that has been carried out, we can conclude that after implementation of CCG significant improvements in process of care are shown. Our findings also suggest clinicians, managers and other health care decision makers which features of CCG might improve the structure of computerized system.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/2
work_keys_str_mv AT galassorocco theeffectivenessofcomputerizedclinicalguidelinesintheprocessofcareasystematicreview
AT sicurolorella theeffectivenessofcomputerizedclinicalguidelinesintheprocessofcareasystematicreview
AT almientoroberta theeffectivenessofcomputerizedclinicalguidelinesintheprocessofcareasystematicreview
AT colosimosimonac theeffectivenessofcomputerizedclinicalguidelinesintheprocessofcareasystematicreview
AT pinnarelliluigi theeffectivenessofcomputerizedclinicalguidelinesintheprocessofcareasystematicreview
AT damianigianfranco theeffectivenessofcomputerizedclinicalguidelinesintheprocessofcareasystematicreview
AT sommellalorenzo theeffectivenessofcomputerizedclinicalguidelinesintheprocessofcareasystematicreview
AT ricciardiwalter theeffectivenessofcomputerizedclinicalguidelinesintheprocessofcareasystematicreview
AT galassorocco effectivenessofcomputerizedclinicalguidelinesintheprocessofcareasystematicreview
AT sicurolorella effectivenessofcomputerizedclinicalguidelinesintheprocessofcareasystematicreview
AT almientoroberta effectivenessofcomputerizedclinicalguidelinesintheprocessofcareasystematicreview
AT colosimosimonac effectivenessofcomputerizedclinicalguidelinesintheprocessofcareasystematicreview
AT pinnarelliluigi effectivenessofcomputerizedclinicalguidelinesintheprocessofcareasystematicreview
AT damianigianfranco effectivenessofcomputerizedclinicalguidelinesintheprocessofcareasystematicreview
AT sommellalorenzo effectivenessofcomputerizedclinicalguidelinesintheprocessofcareasystematicreview
AT ricciardiwalter effectivenessofcomputerizedclinicalguidelinesintheprocessofcareasystematicreview
_version_ 1725983552608141312