TDCS effects on pointing task learning in young and old adults

Abstract Skill increase in motor performance can be defined as explicitly measuring task success but also via more implicit measures of movement kinematics. Even though these measures are often related, there is evidence that they represent distinct concepts of learning. In the present study, the ef...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Kaminski, M. Engelhardt, M. Hoff, C. Steele, A.Villringer, P. Ragert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82275-4
id doaj-b793f224d792408fa780e6a2c2d0aca5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b793f224d792408fa780e6a2c2d0aca52021-02-14T12:33:08ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-02-0111111310.1038/s41598-021-82275-4TDCS effects on pointing task learning in young and old adultsE. Kaminski0M. Engelhardt1M. Hoff2C. Steele3A.Villringer4P. Ragert5Institute for General Kinesiology and Exercise Science, Faculty of Sport Science, University of LeipzigEinstein Center for Neurosciences, Charite-Universitätsmedizin BerlinDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain SciencesDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain SciencesDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain SciencesInstitute for General Kinesiology and Exercise Science, Faculty of Sport Science, University of LeipzigAbstract Skill increase in motor performance can be defined as explicitly measuring task success but also via more implicit measures of movement kinematics. Even though these measures are often related, there is evidence that they represent distinct concepts of learning. In the present study, the effect of multiple tDCS-sessions on both explicit and implicit measures of learning are investigated in a pointing task in 30 young adults (YA) between 27.07 ± 3.8 years and 30 old adults (OA) between 67.97 years ± 5.3 years. We hypothesized, that OA would show slower explicit skill learning indicated by higher movement times/lower accuracy and slower implicit learning indicated by higher spatial variability but profit more from anodal tDCS compared with YA. We found age-related differences in movement time but not in accuracy or spatial variability. TDCS did not skill learning facilitate learning neither in explicit nor implicit parameters. However, contrary to our hypotheses, we found tDCS-associated higher accuracy only in YA but not in spatial variability. Taken together, our data shows limited overlapping of tDCS effects in explicit and implicit skill parameters. Furthermore, it supports the assumption that tDCS is capable of producing a performance-enhancing brain state at least for explicit skill acquisition.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82275-4
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. Kaminski
M. Engelhardt
M. Hoff
C. Steele
A.Villringer
P. Ragert
spellingShingle E. Kaminski
M. Engelhardt
M. Hoff
C. Steele
A.Villringer
P. Ragert
TDCS effects on pointing task learning in young and old adults
Scientific Reports
author_facet E. Kaminski
M. Engelhardt
M. Hoff
C. Steele
A.Villringer
P. Ragert
author_sort E. Kaminski
title TDCS effects on pointing task learning in young and old adults
title_short TDCS effects on pointing task learning in young and old adults
title_full TDCS effects on pointing task learning in young and old adults
title_fullStr TDCS effects on pointing task learning in young and old adults
title_full_unstemmed TDCS effects on pointing task learning in young and old adults
title_sort tdcs effects on pointing task learning in young and old adults
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract Skill increase in motor performance can be defined as explicitly measuring task success but also via more implicit measures of movement kinematics. Even though these measures are often related, there is evidence that they represent distinct concepts of learning. In the present study, the effect of multiple tDCS-sessions on both explicit and implicit measures of learning are investigated in a pointing task in 30 young adults (YA) between 27.07 ± 3.8 years and 30 old adults (OA) between 67.97 years ± 5.3 years. We hypothesized, that OA would show slower explicit skill learning indicated by higher movement times/lower accuracy and slower implicit learning indicated by higher spatial variability but profit more from anodal tDCS compared with YA. We found age-related differences in movement time but not in accuracy or spatial variability. TDCS did not skill learning facilitate learning neither in explicit nor implicit parameters. However, contrary to our hypotheses, we found tDCS-associated higher accuracy only in YA but not in spatial variability. Taken together, our data shows limited overlapping of tDCS effects in explicit and implicit skill parameters. Furthermore, it supports the assumption that tDCS is capable of producing a performance-enhancing brain state at least for explicit skill acquisition.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82275-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ekaminski tdcseffectsonpointingtasklearninginyoungandoldadults
AT mengelhardt tdcseffectsonpointingtasklearninginyoungandoldadults
AT mhoff tdcseffectsonpointingtasklearninginyoungandoldadults
AT csteele tdcseffectsonpointingtasklearninginyoungandoldadults
AT avillringer tdcseffectsonpointingtasklearninginyoungandoldadults
AT pragert tdcseffectsonpointingtasklearninginyoungandoldadults
_version_ 1724270323404111872