Measurement Accuracy of the Body Weight with Smart Insoles
A participant wearing the Pedar-X performed 6 activities on level ground: Slow, medium and fast walk, medium and fast run, and limping. Static BW was measured prior each activity. The dynamic and static BWs were calculated from the mean of the sum of forces of both feet over time and compared to the...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Proceedings |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/2/6/274 |
id |
doaj-b791d097ec414c48ae757f562247117e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b791d097ec414c48ae757f562247117e2020-11-24T21:19:53ZengMDPI AGProceedings2504-39002018-02-012627410.3390/proceedings2060274proceedings2060274Measurement Accuracy of the Body Weight with Smart InsolesAdin Ming Tan0Yehuda Weizman1Franz Konstantin Fuss2Smart Equipment Engineering and Wearable Technologies Research Program, Centre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, AustraliaSmart Equipment Engineering and Wearable Technologies Research Program, Centre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, AustraliaSmart Equipment Engineering and Wearable Technologies Research Program, Centre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, AustraliaA participant wearing the Pedar-X performed 6 activities on level ground: Slow, medium and fast walk, medium and fast run, and limping. Static BW was measured prior each activity. The dynamic and static BWs were calculated from the mean of the sum of forces of both feet over time and compared to the force measured from the force-plate. As the base pressure during the swing phase was not zero, it was treated in 3 ways: including the base pressure; subtracting the mean base pressure from the swing phase; subtraction of the base pressure from the entire signal. The calculated BWs were normalised to the actual BW of the participant. From the results, the BWs calculated had 10% error when static and 6% error when walking. To zero or subtract the baseline pressures improved the BW measurement by 1.75% and 4% respectively. Running data could not be analysed at a sampling rate of 50 Hz.http://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/2/6/274Pedardynamicsbodyweightaccuracybaseline correction |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Adin Ming Tan Yehuda Weizman Franz Konstantin Fuss |
spellingShingle |
Adin Ming Tan Yehuda Weizman Franz Konstantin Fuss Measurement Accuracy of the Body Weight with Smart Insoles Proceedings Pedar dynamics bodyweight accuracy baseline correction |
author_facet |
Adin Ming Tan Yehuda Weizman Franz Konstantin Fuss |
author_sort |
Adin Ming Tan |
title |
Measurement Accuracy of the Body Weight with Smart Insoles |
title_short |
Measurement Accuracy of the Body Weight with Smart Insoles |
title_full |
Measurement Accuracy of the Body Weight with Smart Insoles |
title_fullStr |
Measurement Accuracy of the Body Weight with Smart Insoles |
title_full_unstemmed |
Measurement Accuracy of the Body Weight with Smart Insoles |
title_sort |
measurement accuracy of the body weight with smart insoles |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Proceedings |
issn |
2504-3900 |
publishDate |
2018-02-01 |
description |
A participant wearing the Pedar-X performed 6 activities on level ground: Slow, medium and fast walk, medium and fast run, and limping. Static BW was measured prior each activity. The dynamic and static BWs were calculated from the mean of the sum of forces of both feet over time and compared to the force measured from the force-plate. As the base pressure during the swing phase was not zero, it was treated in 3 ways: including the base pressure; subtracting the mean base pressure from the swing phase; subtraction of the base pressure from the entire signal. The calculated BWs were normalised to the actual BW of the participant. From the results, the BWs calculated had 10% error when static and 6% error when walking. To zero or subtract the baseline pressures improved the BW measurement by 1.75% and 4% respectively. Running data could not be analysed at a sampling rate of 50 Hz. |
topic |
Pedar dynamics bodyweight accuracy baseline correction |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/2/6/274 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT adinmingtan measurementaccuracyofthebodyweightwithsmartinsoles AT yehudaweizman measurementaccuracyofthebodyweightwithsmartinsoles AT franzkonstantinfuss measurementaccuracyofthebodyweightwithsmartinsoles |
_version_ |
1726004724007698432 |