Measurement Accuracy of the Body Weight with Smart Insoles

A participant wearing the Pedar-X performed 6 activities on level ground: Slow, medium and fast walk, medium and fast run, and limping. Static BW was measured prior each activity. The dynamic and static BWs were calculated from the mean of the sum of forces of both feet over time and compared to the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adin Ming Tan, Yehuda Weizman, Franz Konstantin Fuss
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-02-01
Series:Proceedings
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/2/6/274
id doaj-b791d097ec414c48ae757f562247117e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b791d097ec414c48ae757f562247117e2020-11-24T21:19:53ZengMDPI AGProceedings2504-39002018-02-012627410.3390/proceedings2060274proceedings2060274Measurement Accuracy of the Body Weight with Smart InsolesAdin Ming Tan0Yehuda Weizman1Franz Konstantin Fuss2Smart Equipment Engineering and Wearable Technologies Research Program, Centre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, AustraliaSmart Equipment Engineering and Wearable Technologies Research Program, Centre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, AustraliaSmart Equipment Engineering and Wearable Technologies Research Program, Centre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, AustraliaA participant wearing the Pedar-X performed 6 activities on level ground: Slow, medium and fast walk, medium and fast run, and limping. Static BW was measured prior each activity. The dynamic and static BWs were calculated from the mean of the sum of forces of both feet over time and compared to the force measured from the force-plate. As the base pressure during the swing phase was not zero, it was treated in 3 ways: including the base pressure; subtracting the mean base pressure from the swing phase; subtraction of the base pressure from the entire signal. The calculated BWs were normalised to the actual BW of the participant. From the results, the BWs calculated had 10% error when static and 6% error when walking. To zero or subtract the baseline pressures improved the BW measurement by 1.75% and 4% respectively. Running data could not be analysed at a sampling rate of 50 Hz.http://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/2/6/274Pedardynamicsbodyweightaccuracybaseline correction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adin Ming Tan
Yehuda Weizman
Franz Konstantin Fuss
spellingShingle Adin Ming Tan
Yehuda Weizman
Franz Konstantin Fuss
Measurement Accuracy of the Body Weight with Smart Insoles
Proceedings
Pedar
dynamics
bodyweight
accuracy
baseline correction
author_facet Adin Ming Tan
Yehuda Weizman
Franz Konstantin Fuss
author_sort Adin Ming Tan
title Measurement Accuracy of the Body Weight with Smart Insoles
title_short Measurement Accuracy of the Body Weight with Smart Insoles
title_full Measurement Accuracy of the Body Weight with Smart Insoles
title_fullStr Measurement Accuracy of the Body Weight with Smart Insoles
title_full_unstemmed Measurement Accuracy of the Body Weight with Smart Insoles
title_sort measurement accuracy of the body weight with smart insoles
publisher MDPI AG
series Proceedings
issn 2504-3900
publishDate 2018-02-01
description A participant wearing the Pedar-X performed 6 activities on level ground: Slow, medium and fast walk, medium and fast run, and limping. Static BW was measured prior each activity. The dynamic and static BWs were calculated from the mean of the sum of forces of both feet over time and compared to the force measured from the force-plate. As the base pressure during the swing phase was not zero, it was treated in 3 ways: including the base pressure; subtracting the mean base pressure from the swing phase; subtraction of the base pressure from the entire signal. The calculated BWs were normalised to the actual BW of the participant. From the results, the BWs calculated had 10% error when static and 6% error when walking. To zero or subtract the baseline pressures improved the BW measurement by 1.75% and 4% respectively. Running data could not be analysed at a sampling rate of 50 Hz.
topic Pedar
dynamics
bodyweight
accuracy
baseline correction
url http://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/2/6/274
work_keys_str_mv AT adinmingtan measurementaccuracyofthebodyweightwithsmartinsoles
AT yehudaweizman measurementaccuracyofthebodyweightwithsmartinsoles
AT franzkonstantinfuss measurementaccuracyofthebodyweightwithsmartinsoles
_version_ 1726004724007698432