Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa
Background: Achieving sustainable universal health coverage depends partly on fair priority-setting processes that ensure countries spend scarce resources wisely. While general health economics capacity-strengthening initiatives exist in Africa, less attention has been paid to developing the capacit...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Global Health Action |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1370194 |
id |
doaj-b7875ffcca4940ff8f0e5e4694701da3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b7875ffcca4940ff8f0e5e4694701da32020-11-24T21:59:56ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGlobal Health Action1654-97161654-98802017-01-0110110.1080/16549716.2017.13701941370194Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in AfricaJane E Doherty0Thomas Wilkinson1Ijeoma Edoka2Karen Hofman3University of the WitwatersrandUniversity of the WitwatersrandUniversity of the WitwatersrandUniversity of the WitwatersrandBackground: Achieving sustainable universal health coverage depends partly on fair priority-setting processes that ensure countries spend scarce resources wisely. While general health economics capacity-strengthening initiatives exist in Africa, less attention has been paid to developing the capacity of individuals, institutions and networks to apply economic evaluation in support of health technology assessment and effective priority-setting. Objective: On the basis of international lessons, to identify how research organisations and partnerships could contribute to capacity strengthening for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa. Methods: A rapid scan was conducted of international formal and grey literature and lessons extracted from the deliberations of two international and regional workshops relating to capacity-building for health technology assessment. ‘Capacity’ was defined in broad terms, including a conducive political environment, strong public institutional capacity to drive priority-setting, effective networking between experts, strong research organisations and skilled researchers. Results: Effective priority-setting requires more than high quality economic research. Researchers have to engage with an array of stakeholders, network closely other research organisations, build partnerships with different levels of government and train the future generation of researchers and policy-makers. In low- and middle-income countries where there are seldom government units or agencies dedicated to health technology assessment, they also have to support the development of an effective priority-setting process that is sensitive to societal and government needs and priorities. Conclusions: Research organisations have an important role to play in contributing to the development of health technology assessment and priority-setting capacity. In Africa, where there are resource and capacity challenges, effective partnerships between local and international researchers, and with key government stakeholders, can leverage existing skills and knowledge to generate a critical mass of individuals and institutions. These would help to meet the priority-setting needs of African countries and contribute to sustainable universal health coverage.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1370194Researchcapacitynetworkshealth technology assessment |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jane E Doherty Thomas Wilkinson Ijeoma Edoka Karen Hofman |
spellingShingle |
Jane E Doherty Thomas Wilkinson Ijeoma Edoka Karen Hofman Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa Global Health Action Research capacity networks health technology assessment |
author_facet |
Jane E Doherty Thomas Wilkinson Ijeoma Edoka Karen Hofman |
author_sort |
Jane E Doherty |
title |
Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa |
title_short |
Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa |
title_full |
Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa |
title_fullStr |
Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa |
title_sort |
strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in africa |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Global Health Action |
issn |
1654-9716 1654-9880 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
Background: Achieving sustainable universal health coverage depends partly on fair priority-setting processes that ensure countries spend scarce resources wisely. While general health economics capacity-strengthening initiatives exist in Africa, less attention has been paid to developing the capacity of individuals, institutions and networks to apply economic evaluation in support of health technology assessment and effective priority-setting. Objective: On the basis of international lessons, to identify how research organisations and partnerships could contribute to capacity strengthening for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa. Methods: A rapid scan was conducted of international formal and grey literature and lessons extracted from the deliberations of two international and regional workshops relating to capacity-building for health technology assessment. ‘Capacity’ was defined in broad terms, including a conducive political environment, strong public institutional capacity to drive priority-setting, effective networking between experts, strong research organisations and skilled researchers. Results: Effective priority-setting requires more than high quality economic research. Researchers have to engage with an array of stakeholders, network closely other research organisations, build partnerships with different levels of government and train the future generation of researchers and policy-makers. In low- and middle-income countries where there are seldom government units or agencies dedicated to health technology assessment, they also have to support the development of an effective priority-setting process that is sensitive to societal and government needs and priorities. Conclusions: Research organisations have an important role to play in contributing to the development of health technology assessment and priority-setting capacity. In Africa, where there are resource and capacity challenges, effective partnerships between local and international researchers, and with key government stakeholders, can leverage existing skills and knowledge to generate a critical mass of individuals and institutions. These would help to meet the priority-setting needs of African countries and contribute to sustainable universal health coverage. |
topic |
Research capacity networks health technology assessment |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1370194 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT janeedoherty strengtheningexpertiseforhealthtechnologyassessmentandprioritysettinginafrica AT thomaswilkinson strengtheningexpertiseforhealthtechnologyassessmentandprioritysettinginafrica AT ijeomaedoka strengtheningexpertiseforhealthtechnologyassessmentandprioritysettinginafrica AT karenhofman strengtheningexpertiseforhealthtechnologyassessmentandprioritysettinginafrica |
_version_ |
1725846290517983232 |