Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa

Background: Achieving sustainable universal health coverage depends partly on fair priority-setting processes that ensure countries spend scarce resources wisely. While general health economics capacity-strengthening initiatives exist in Africa, less attention has been paid to developing the capacit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jane E Doherty, Thomas Wilkinson, Ijeoma Edoka, Karen Hofman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2017-01-01
Series:Global Health Action
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1370194
id doaj-b7875ffcca4940ff8f0e5e4694701da3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b7875ffcca4940ff8f0e5e4694701da32020-11-24T21:59:56ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGlobal Health Action1654-97161654-98802017-01-0110110.1080/16549716.2017.13701941370194Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in AfricaJane E Doherty0Thomas Wilkinson1Ijeoma Edoka2Karen Hofman3University of the WitwatersrandUniversity of the WitwatersrandUniversity of the WitwatersrandUniversity of the WitwatersrandBackground: Achieving sustainable universal health coverage depends partly on fair priority-setting processes that ensure countries spend scarce resources wisely. While general health economics capacity-strengthening initiatives exist in Africa, less attention has been paid to developing the capacity of individuals, institutions and networks to apply economic evaluation in support of health technology assessment and effective priority-setting. Objective: On the basis of international  lessons, to identify how research organisations and partnerships could contribute to capacity strengthening for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa. Methods: A rapid scan was conducted of international formal and grey literature and lessons extracted from the deliberations of two international and regional workshops relating to capacity-building for health technology assessment. ‘Capacity’ was defined in broad terms, including a conducive political environment, strong public institutional capacity to drive priority-setting, effective networking between experts, strong research organisations and skilled researchers. Results: Effective priority-setting requires more than high quality economic research. Researchers have to engage with an array of stakeholders, network closely other research organisations, build partnerships with different levels of government and train the future generation of researchers and policy-makers. In low- and middle-income countries where there are seldom government units or agencies dedicated to health technology assessment, they also have to support the development of an effective priority-setting process that is sensitive to societal and government needs and priorities. Conclusions: Research organisations have an important role to play in contributing to the development of health technology assessment and priority-setting capacity. In Africa, where there are resource and capacity challenges, effective partnerships between local and international researchers, and with key government stakeholders, can leverage existing skills and knowledge to generate a critical mass of individuals and institutions. These would help to meet the priority-setting needs of African countries and contribute to sustainable universal health coverage.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1370194Researchcapacitynetworkshealth technology assessment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jane E Doherty
Thomas Wilkinson
Ijeoma Edoka
Karen Hofman
spellingShingle Jane E Doherty
Thomas Wilkinson
Ijeoma Edoka
Karen Hofman
Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa
Global Health Action
Research
capacity
networks
health technology assessment
author_facet Jane E Doherty
Thomas Wilkinson
Ijeoma Edoka
Karen Hofman
author_sort Jane E Doherty
title Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa
title_short Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa
title_full Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa
title_fullStr Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa
title_full_unstemmed Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa
title_sort strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in africa
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Global Health Action
issn 1654-9716
1654-9880
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Background: Achieving sustainable universal health coverage depends partly on fair priority-setting processes that ensure countries spend scarce resources wisely. While general health economics capacity-strengthening initiatives exist in Africa, less attention has been paid to developing the capacity of individuals, institutions and networks to apply economic evaluation in support of health technology assessment and effective priority-setting. Objective: On the basis of international  lessons, to identify how research organisations and partnerships could contribute to capacity strengthening for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa. Methods: A rapid scan was conducted of international formal and grey literature and lessons extracted from the deliberations of two international and regional workshops relating to capacity-building for health technology assessment. ‘Capacity’ was defined in broad terms, including a conducive political environment, strong public institutional capacity to drive priority-setting, effective networking between experts, strong research organisations and skilled researchers. Results: Effective priority-setting requires more than high quality economic research. Researchers have to engage with an array of stakeholders, network closely other research organisations, build partnerships with different levels of government and train the future generation of researchers and policy-makers. In low- and middle-income countries where there are seldom government units or agencies dedicated to health technology assessment, they also have to support the development of an effective priority-setting process that is sensitive to societal and government needs and priorities. Conclusions: Research organisations have an important role to play in contributing to the development of health technology assessment and priority-setting capacity. In Africa, where there are resource and capacity challenges, effective partnerships between local and international researchers, and with key government stakeholders, can leverage existing skills and knowledge to generate a critical mass of individuals and institutions. These would help to meet the priority-setting needs of African countries and contribute to sustainable universal health coverage.
topic Research
capacity
networks
health technology assessment
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1370194
work_keys_str_mv AT janeedoherty strengtheningexpertiseforhealthtechnologyassessmentandprioritysettinginafrica
AT thomaswilkinson strengtheningexpertiseforhealthtechnologyassessmentandprioritysettinginafrica
AT ijeomaedoka strengtheningexpertiseforhealthtechnologyassessmentandprioritysettinginafrica
AT karenhofman strengtheningexpertiseforhealthtechnologyassessmentandprioritysettinginafrica
_version_ 1725846290517983232