Exploring Age-Related Metamemory Differences using Modified Brier Scores and Hierarchical Clustering

Older adults (OAs) typically experience memory failures as they age. However, with some exceptions, studies of OAs’ ability to assess their own memory functions—Metamemory (MM)— find little evidence that this function is susceptible to age-related decline. Our study examines OAs’ and young adults’ (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Parlett-Pelleriti Chelsea, Lin Grace C., Jones Masha R., Linstead Erik, Jaeggi Susanne M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2019-01-01
Series:Open Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0015
id doaj-b7857fe1a2e643b1afdfa298d2cd28d3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b7857fe1a2e643b1afdfa298d2cd28d32021-09-05T13:59:55ZengDe GruyterOpen Psychology2543-88832019-01-011121523810.1515/psych-2018-0015psych-2018-0015Exploring Age-Related Metamemory Differences using Modified Brier Scores and Hierarchical ClusteringParlett-Pelleriti Chelsea0Lin Grace C.1Jones Masha R.2Linstead Erik3Jaeggi Susanne M.4Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, 92866 California, USASchool of Education, University of California Irvine, 92697 California, USASchool of Education, University of California Irvine, 92697 California, USASchmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, 92866 California, USASchool of Education, University of California Irvine, 92697 California, USAOlder adults (OAs) typically experience memory failures as they age. However, with some exceptions, studies of OAs’ ability to assess their own memory functions—Metamemory (MM)— find little evidence that this function is susceptible to age-related decline. Our study examines OAs’ and young adults’ (YAs) MM performance and strategy use. Groups of YAs (N = 138) and OAs (N = 79) performed a MM task that required participants to place bets on how likely they were to remember words in a list. Our analytical approach includes hierarchical clustering, and we introduce a new measure of MM—the modified Brier—in order to adjust for differences in scale usage between participants. Our data indicate that OAs and YAs differ in the strategies they use to assess their memory and in how well their MM matches with memory performance. However, there was no evidence that the chosen strategies were associated with differences in MM match, indicating that there are multiple strategies that might be effective (i.e. lead to similar match) in this MM task.https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0015machine learninghierarchical clusteringmbrierolder adultsmeta-cognition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Parlett-Pelleriti Chelsea
Lin Grace C.
Jones Masha R.
Linstead Erik
Jaeggi Susanne M.
spellingShingle Parlett-Pelleriti Chelsea
Lin Grace C.
Jones Masha R.
Linstead Erik
Jaeggi Susanne M.
Exploring Age-Related Metamemory Differences using Modified Brier Scores and Hierarchical Clustering
Open Psychology
machine learning
hierarchical clustering
mbrier
older adults
meta-cognition
author_facet Parlett-Pelleriti Chelsea
Lin Grace C.
Jones Masha R.
Linstead Erik
Jaeggi Susanne M.
author_sort Parlett-Pelleriti Chelsea
title Exploring Age-Related Metamemory Differences using Modified Brier Scores and Hierarchical Clustering
title_short Exploring Age-Related Metamemory Differences using Modified Brier Scores and Hierarchical Clustering
title_full Exploring Age-Related Metamemory Differences using Modified Brier Scores and Hierarchical Clustering
title_fullStr Exploring Age-Related Metamemory Differences using Modified Brier Scores and Hierarchical Clustering
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Age-Related Metamemory Differences using Modified Brier Scores and Hierarchical Clustering
title_sort exploring age-related metamemory differences using modified brier scores and hierarchical clustering
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Psychology
issn 2543-8883
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Older adults (OAs) typically experience memory failures as they age. However, with some exceptions, studies of OAs’ ability to assess their own memory functions—Metamemory (MM)— find little evidence that this function is susceptible to age-related decline. Our study examines OAs’ and young adults’ (YAs) MM performance and strategy use. Groups of YAs (N = 138) and OAs (N = 79) performed a MM task that required participants to place bets on how likely they were to remember words in a list. Our analytical approach includes hierarchical clustering, and we introduce a new measure of MM—the modified Brier—in order to adjust for differences in scale usage between participants. Our data indicate that OAs and YAs differ in the strategies they use to assess their memory and in how well their MM matches with memory performance. However, there was no evidence that the chosen strategies were associated with differences in MM match, indicating that there are multiple strategies that might be effective (i.e. lead to similar match) in this MM task.
topic machine learning
hierarchical clustering
mbrier
older adults
meta-cognition
url https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0015
work_keys_str_mv AT parlettpelleritichelsea exploringagerelatedmetamemorydifferencesusingmodifiedbrierscoresandhierarchicalclustering
AT lingracec exploringagerelatedmetamemorydifferencesusingmodifiedbrierscoresandhierarchicalclustering
AT jonesmashar exploringagerelatedmetamemorydifferencesusingmodifiedbrierscoresandhierarchicalclustering
AT linsteaderik exploringagerelatedmetamemorydifferencesusingmodifiedbrierscoresandhierarchicalclustering
AT jaeggisusannem exploringagerelatedmetamemorydifferencesusingmodifiedbrierscoresandhierarchicalclustering
_version_ 1717812749245874176