Land Grabbing, Local Contestation, and the Struggle for Economic Gain

This article examines why peasant communities in South West Cameroon have contested a U.S.-based company’s intentions to establish an agro-industrial palm oil plantation in their region. Land investments in the form of agro plantations, if not properly conceived, negotiated, and implemented, pose a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Frankline Anum Ndi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-01-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016682997
id doaj-b77c5a80d3a54ec7bd34086b969c69c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b77c5a80d3a54ec7bd34086b969c69c72020-11-25T04:08:58ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402017-01-01710.1177/215824401668299710.1177_2158244016682997Land Grabbing, Local Contestation, and the Struggle for Economic GainFrankline Anum Ndi0University of Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaThis article examines why peasant communities in South West Cameroon have contested a U.S.-based company’s intentions to establish an agro-industrial palm oil plantation in their region. Land investments in the form of agro plantations, if not properly conceived, negotiated, and implemented, pose a series of threats to the ecological, cultural, and economic stability among peasant farming communities, who depend on land and forest resources for their livelihood. Using Nguti as a case study, this article argues that local communities do not oppose investment in land but they contest projects that attempt to alienate them from their sources of livelihood without providing alternatives. The study also demonstrates how local communities, despite being critical of the project, struggle with the company through their relations with government, to demand new social contracts and/or memoranda that could offer them greater opportunities as economic partners. The article concludes that for palm oil plantations to be economically equitable, local communities’ incorporation is necessary to safeguard rural livelihoods and to ensure that provisions are made for adequate compensation and alternative sources of livelihood.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016682997
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frankline Anum Ndi
spellingShingle Frankline Anum Ndi
Land Grabbing, Local Contestation, and the Struggle for Economic Gain
SAGE Open
author_facet Frankline Anum Ndi
author_sort Frankline Anum Ndi
title Land Grabbing, Local Contestation, and the Struggle for Economic Gain
title_short Land Grabbing, Local Contestation, and the Struggle for Economic Gain
title_full Land Grabbing, Local Contestation, and the Struggle for Economic Gain
title_fullStr Land Grabbing, Local Contestation, and the Struggle for Economic Gain
title_full_unstemmed Land Grabbing, Local Contestation, and the Struggle for Economic Gain
title_sort land grabbing, local contestation, and the struggle for economic gain
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2017-01-01
description This article examines why peasant communities in South West Cameroon have contested a U.S.-based company’s intentions to establish an agro-industrial palm oil plantation in their region. Land investments in the form of agro plantations, if not properly conceived, negotiated, and implemented, pose a series of threats to the ecological, cultural, and economic stability among peasant farming communities, who depend on land and forest resources for their livelihood. Using Nguti as a case study, this article argues that local communities do not oppose investment in land but they contest projects that attempt to alienate them from their sources of livelihood without providing alternatives. The study also demonstrates how local communities, despite being critical of the project, struggle with the company through their relations with government, to demand new social contracts and/or memoranda that could offer them greater opportunities as economic partners. The article concludes that for palm oil plantations to be economically equitable, local communities’ incorporation is necessary to safeguard rural livelihoods and to ensure that provisions are made for adequate compensation and alternative sources of livelihood.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016682997
work_keys_str_mv AT franklineanumndi landgrabbinglocalcontestationandthestruggleforeconomicgain
_version_ 1724423831034003456